Evidence theory is one of the approaches designed specifically for dealing with epistemic uncertainty. This type of uncertainty modeling is often useful at preliminary design stages where the uncertainty related to lack of knowledge is the highest. While multiple approaches for propagating epistemic uncertainty through one-dimensional functions have been proposed, propagation through functions having a multidimensional output that need to be considered at once received less attention. Such propagation is particularly important when the multiple function outputs are not independent, which frequently occurs in real world problems. The present paper proposes an approach for calculating belief and plausibility measures by uncertainty propagation through functions with multidimensional, nonindependent output by formulating the problem as one-dimensional optimization problems in spite of the multidimensionality of the output. A general formulation is first presented followed by two special cases where the multidimensional function is convex and where it is linear over each focal element. An analytical example first illustrates the importance of considering all the function outputs at once when these are not independent. Then, an application example to preliminary design of a propeller aircraft then illustrates the proposed algorithm for a convex function. An approximate solution found to be almost identical to the exact solution is also obtained for this problem by linearizing the previous convex function over each focal element.

References

1.
Wagner
,
R. L.
, 2003, “
Science, Uncertainty and Risk: The Problem of Complex Phenomena
,”
APS News
,
12
(
1
), pp.
8
.
2.
Oberkampf
,
W. L.
,
DeLand
,
S. M.
,
Rutherford
,
B. M.
,
Diegert
,
K. V.
, and
Alvin
,
K. F.
, 2002, “
Error and Uncertainty in Modeling and Simulation
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
,
75
(
3
), pp.
333
357
.
3.
Helton
,
J. C.
, 1997, “
Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis in the Presence of Stochastic and Subjective Uncertainty
,”
J. Stat. Comput. Simul.
,
57
, pp.
3
76
.
4.
Oberkampf
,
W. L.
,
Diegert
,
K. V.
,
Alvin
,
K. F.
, and
Rutherford
,
B. M.
, 1998, “
Variability, Uncertainty, and Error in Computational Simulation
,”
ASME Proceedings of the 7th AIAA/ASME Joint Thermophysics and Heat Transfer Conference
,
357-2
, pp.
259
272
.
5.
Walley
,
P.
, 2000, “
Towards a Unified Theory of Imprecise Probability
,”
Int. J. Approx. Reason.
,
24
, pp.
125
148
.
6.
Klir
,
G. J.
, 2004, “
Generalized Information Theory: Aims, Results, and Open Problems
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
,
85
, pp.
355
369
.
7.
Helton
,
J. C.
, and
Oberkampf
,
W. L.
, 2004, “
Alternative Representations of Epistemic Uncertainty
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
,
85
, pp.
1
10
.
8.
Ferson
,
S.
,
Joslyn
,
C. A.
,
Helton
,
J. C.
,
Oberkampf
,
W. L.
, and
Sentz
,
K.
, 2004, “
Summary From the Epistemic Uncertainty Workshop: Consensus Amid Diversity
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
,
85
, pp.
355
369
.
9.
Agarwal
,
H.
,
Renaud
,
J. E.
,
Preston
,
E. L.
, and
Padmanabhan
,
D.
, 2004, “
Uncertainty Quantification Using Evidence Theory in Multidisciplinary Design Optimization
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
,
85
, pp.
281
294
.
10.
Couso
,
I.
, and
Moral
,
S.
, 2010, “
Independence Concepts in Evidence Theory
,”
Int. J. Approx. Reason.
,
51
, pp.
748
758
.
11.
Ben Yaghlane
,
B.
,
Smets
,
P.
, and
Mellouli
,
K.
, 2002, “
Belief Functions Independence: I. The Marginal Case
,”
Int. J. Approx. Reason.
,
29
, pp.
47
70
.
12.
Dempster
,
A. P.
, 1967, “
Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping
,”
Ann. Math. Stat.
,
38
, pp.
325
39
.
13.
Shafer
,
G.
, 1976,
A mathematical theory of evidence
,
Princeton University
,
Princeton, NJ
.
14.
Mourelatos
,
Z. P.
, and
Zhou
,
J.
, 2006, “
A Design Optimization Method Using Evidence Theory
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
128
(
4
), pp.
901
908
.
15.
Du
,
X.
, 2008, “
Unified Uncertainty Analysis by the First Order Reliability Method
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
130
(
9
), p.
091401
.
16.
Dong
,
W. M.
, and
Shah
,
H. C.
, 1987, “
Vertex Method for Computing Functions of Fuzzy Variable
,”
Fuzzy Sets Syst.
,
24
, pp.
65
78
.
17.
Dubois
,
D.
,
Fargier
,
H.
, and
Fortin
,
J.
, 2004, “
A Generalized Vertex Method for Computing With Fuzzy Intervals
,”
Proc. 2004 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems
,
1
, pp.
541
546
.
18.
Bae
,
H.
,
Grandhi
,
R. V.
, and
Canfield
,
R. A.
, 2004, “
An Approximation Approach for Uncertainty Quantification Using Evidence Theory
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
,
86
, pp.
215
225
.
19.
Joslyn
,
C.
, and
Helton
,
J. C.
, 2002, “
Bounds on Belief and Plausibility of Functionality Propagated Random Sets
,” Proc. Annual Meetings of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, pp.
412
417
, New Orleans, LA, June 27–29, 2002.
20.
Joslyn
,
C.
, and
Kreinovich
,
V.
, 2005, “
Convergence Properties of an Interval Probabilistic Approach to System Reliability Estimation
,”
Int. J. General Syst.
,
34
(
4
), pp.
465
482
.
21.
Helton
,
J. C.
,
Johnson
,
J. D.
,
Oberkampf
,
W. L.
, and
Storlie
,
C. B.
, 2007, “
A Sampling-Based Computational Strategy for the Representation of Epistemic Uncertainty in Model Predictions With Evidence Theory
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
,
196
(
37–40
), pp.
3980
3998
.
22.
Moré
,
J. J.
, and
Wright
,
S. J.
, 1993,
Optimization Software Guide
,
SIAM
,
Philadelphia, PA
.
23.
Nesterov
,
Y.
, and
Nemirovskii
,
A.
, 1987,
Interior-Point Polynomial Algorithms in Convex Programming
,
SIAM
,
Philadelphia, PA
.
24.
Karmarkar
,
N.
, 1984, “
A New Polynomial Time Algorithm for Linear Programming
,”
Combinatorica
,
4
(
4
), pp.
373
395
.
25.
Corning
,
G.
, 1970,
Supersonic and Subsonic Airplane Design
, 3rd ed.,
Published by Corning, G.
26.
Roskam
,
J.
, 1989,
Airplane Design Vol. 1: Preliminary sizing of airplanes
,
Darcorp
,
Lawrence, KS
.
27.
Scholz
,
D.
, and
Nita
,
M.
, 2008, “
Preliminary Sizing of Large Propeller Driven Aeroplanes
,” Proceedings of the 8th International Seminar on Recent Research and Design Progress in Aeronautical Engineering,
Brno, Czech Republic
, October 2008.
You do not currently have access to this content.