The management of end-of-life electronic waste (e-waste) attracts significant attention due to environmental concerns, legislative requirements, consumer interest in green products, and the market image of manufacturers. However, managing e-waste is complicated by several factors, including the high degree of uncertainty of quantity, timing of arrival, and quality of the returned products. This variability in the stream of returned end-of-life (EOL) products makes it difficult to plan for remanufacturing facility materials, equipment, and human resource requirements. The aim of this research is to tackle the uncertainty associated with the quantity of received used products. A stochastic programming model for waste stream acquisition systems (as opposed to market-driven systems) is introduced. The model considers the quantity of returned product as an uncertain parameter and determines to what extent the product should be disassembled and what is the best EOL option for each subassembly. The stochastic model is defined in a form of chance constrained programming and is then converted to a mixed integer linear programming. An example is provided to illustrate the application of the model for an uncertain stream of PCs (minus monitor and keyboard) received in a PC refurbishing company. The remanufacturer must then decide which proportion of disassembled modules should be processed given specific remanufacturing options.

References

References
1.
Ilgin
,
M. A.
, and
Gupta
,
S. M.
, 2010, “
Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing and Product Recovery (ECMPRO): A Review of the State of the Art
,”
J. Environ. Manage.
,
91
(
3
), pp.
563
591
.
2.
Guide
,
V. D. R.
, and
Wassenhove
,
L. N. V.
, 2001, “
Managing Product Returns for Remanufacturing
,”
Prod. Oper. Manage.
,
10
(
2
), pp.
142
155
.
3.
Ramani
,
K.
,
Ramanujan
,
D.
,
Bernstein
,
W. Z.
,
Zhao
,
F.
,
Sutherland
,
J.
,
Handwerker
,
C.
,
Choi
,
J.
,
Kim
,
H.
, and
Thurston
,
D.
, 2010, “
Integrated Sustainable Life Cycle Design: A Review
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
132
(
9
), p.
091004
.
4.
Zhao
,
Y.
,
Pandey
,
V.
,
Kim
,
H.
, and
Thurston
,
D.
, 2010, “
Varying Lifecycle Lengths Within a Product Take-Back Portfolio
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
132
(
9
), p.
091012
.
5.
Salema
,
M. I. G.
,
Barbosa-Povoa
,
A. P.
, and
Novais
,
A. Q.
, 2007, “
An Optimization Model for the Design of a Capacitated Multi-Product Reverse Logistics Network With Uncertainty
,”
Eur. J. Oper. Res.
,
179
(
3
), pp.
1063
1077
.
6.
Listes
,
O.
, and
Dekker
,
R.
, 2005, “
A Stochastic Approach to a Case Study for Product Recovery Network Design
,”
Eur. J. Oper. Res.
,
160
(
1
), pp.
268
287
.
7.
Qin
,
X.-H.
,
Ye
,
H.-Z.
, and
Yang
,
C.-H.
, 2007, “
An Optimization Design for a Half-Closed-Loop Logistics Network With Uncertainty
,” 2007 3rd International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking, and Mobile Computing—WiCOM ‘07, pp.
4957
4960
.
8.
Chen
,
Q.
, and
Gu
,
Q.
, 2007, “
Analysis of Quantity Uncertainty of Returns on Remanufacturing Logistic Network Using a Stochastic Programming Model
,” 2007 IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation,
ICCA
, pp.
3073
3077
.
9.
Gonzalez-Torre
,
B.
, and
Adenso-Diaz
,
B.
, 2003, “
Optimizing Decision Making at the End of Life of a Product
Proc. SPIE
,
5262
(
1
), pp.
40
50
.
10.
Rickli
,
J. L.
,
Camelio
,
J. A.
, and
Zapata
,
G.
, 2009, “
Partial Disassembly Sequence Optimization of End-of-Life Products for Value Recovery
,” Proceedings of the ASME International Manufacturing Science & Engineering Conference, 2009, pp.
87
96
.
11.
Dong
,
J.
,
Gibson
,
P.
, and
Arndt
,
G.
, 2007, “
Disassembly Sequence Generation in Recycling Based on Parts Accessibility and End-of-Life Strategy
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part B
,
221
(
B6
), pp.
1079
1085
.
12.
Lee
,
S. G.
,
Lye
,
S. W.
, and
Khoo
,
M. K.
, 2001, “
A Multi-Objective Methodology for Evaluating Product End-of-Life Options and Disassembly
,”
Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.
,
18
(
2
), pp.
148
156
.
13.
Kwak
,
M. J.
,
Hong
,
Y. S.
, and
Cho
,
N. W.
, 2007, “
Eco-Architecture Analysis as a Method of End-of-Life Decision Making for Sustainable Product Design
,” Proceedings of ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, DETC2007, 3, Part A, pp.
499
511
.
14.
Behdad
,
S.
,
Kwak
,
M.
,
Kim
,
H.
, and
Thurston
,
D.
, 2010, “
Simultaneous Selective Disassembly and End-of-Life Decision Making for Multiple Products That Share Disassembly Operations
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
132
(
4
), p.
041002
.
15.
Facts and Figures on E-Waste and Recycling, January 2011, EPA report, http://www.electronicstakeback.com/wp-content/uploads/Facts_and_Figures
16.
Microsoft report on “Microsoft and the Secondary PC Market,” March 2008.
17.
Bhuie
,
A. K.
,
Ogunseitan
,
O. A.
,
Saphores
,
J.-D. M.
, and
Shapiro
,
A. A.
, 2004, “
Environmental and Economic Trade-Offs in Consumer Electronic Products Recycling: A Case Study of Cell Phones and Computers
,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, pp.
74
79
.
You do not currently have access to this content.