Bayesian reliability analysis (BRA) technique has been actively used in reliability assessment for engineered systems. However, there are two key controversies surrounding the BRA: the reasonableness of the prior and the consistency among all data sets. These issues have been debated in Bayesian analysis for many years. As we observed, they have not been resolved satisfactorily. These controversies have seriously hindered the applications of BRA as a useful reliability analysis tool to support engineering design. In this paper, a Bayesian reliability analysis methodology with a prior and data validation and adjustment scheme (PDVAS) is developed to address these issues. As the part of the PDVAS development, a consistency measure is first defined that judges the level of consistency among all data sets including the prior. The consistency measure is then used to adjust either the prior or the data or both to the extent that the prior and the data are statistically consistent. This prior and data validation and adjustment scheme is developed for Binomial sampling with Beta prior, called Beta-Binomial Bayesian model. The properties of the scheme are presented and discussed that provides some insights of PDVAS. Various forms of the adjustment formulas are shown, and a selection framework of a specific formula, based on engineering design and analysis knowledge, is established. Several illustrative examples are presented, which show the reasonableness, effectiveness, and usefulness of PDVAS. General discussion of the scheme is offered to enhance the Bayesian reliability analysis in engineering design for reliability assessment.

References

1.
Wang
,
P.
,
Youn
,
B. D
,
Xi
,
Z.
, and
Kloess
,
A.
, 2009, “
Bayesian Reliability Analysis With Evolving, Insufficient and Subjective Data Sets
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
131
, p.
111008
.
2.
Coolen
,
F. P. A.
, and
Newby
,
M. J.
, 1994, “
Bayesian Reliability Analysis With Imprecise Prior Probabilities
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
,
43
, pp.
75
85
.
3.
Martz
,
H. F.
, and
Waller
,
R. A.
, 1982,
Bayesian Reliability Analysis
,
John Wiley & Sons
,
New York
.
4.
Hamada
,
M. S.
,
Wilson
,
A. G.
,
Reese
,
C. S.
, and
Martz
,
H. F.
, 2008,
Bayesian Reliability
,
Springer
,
New York
.
5.
Gelman
,
A.
, 2008, “
Objections to Bayesian Statistics
,”
Bayesian Anal.
,
3
, pp.
445
450
.
6.
Efron
,
B.
, 1986, “
Why Isn’t Everyone a Bayesian?
Am. Stat.
,
40
(
1
), pp.
1
5
.
7.
Jeffreys
,
H.
, 1946, “
An Invariant Form for the Prior Probability in Estimation Problems
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London
,
186
, pp.
453
461
.
8.
Kass
,
R. E.
, and
Wasserman
,
L.
, 1996, “
The Selection of Prior Distributions by Formal Rules
,”
J. Am. Stat. Assoc.
,
91
(
435
), pp.
1343
1370
.
9.
Jaynes
,
E. T.
, 1982, “
On the Rationale of Maximum Entropy Methods
,”
Proc. IEEE
,
70
, pp.
939
952
.
10.
Bernardo
,
J. M.
, 1979, “
Reference Posterior Distribution for Bayesian Inference
,”
J. R. Stat. Soc. B
,
41
(
2
), pp.
113
147
.
11.
Welch
,
B.
, and
Peers
,
H. W.
, 1963, “
On Formulas for Confidence Points on Integrals of Weighted Likelihood
,”
J. R. Stat. Soc. B
,
25
, pp.
318
329
.
12.
Datta
,
G. S.
, 1996, “
On Priors Providing Frequentist Validity of Bayesian Inference for Multiple Parametric Functions
,”
Biometrika
,
83
(
2
), pp.
287
298
.
13.
Fraser
,
D. A. S.
, and
Reid
,
N.
, 2002, “
Strong Matching of Frequentist and Bayesian Parametric Inference
,”
J. Stat. Plann. Inference
,
103
, pp.
263
285
.
14.
Huang
,
Z.
, and
Jin
,
Y.
, 2009, “
Reliability Prediction Methods: A Survey and Selection for Mechanical Design-for-Reliability
,”
ASME IDETC 2009-87103
,
San Diego
,
CA
.
15.
Grantham Lough
,
K.
,
Stone
,
R. B.
, and
Tumer
,
I.
, 2005, “
Function Based Risk Assessment: Mapping Function to Likelihood
,”
DETC 2005-85053
, Long Beach, CA.
16.
Grantham Lough
,
K.
,
Stone
,
R. B.
, and
Tumer
,
I.
, 2006, “
Prescribing and Implementing the Risk in Early Design (RED) Method
,”
DETC 2006-99374
, Philadelphia, PA.
17.
Wang
,
K.
, and
Jin
,
Y.
, 2002, “
An Analytical Approach to Functional Design
,”
DETC 2002-34084
, Montreal, Canada.
18.
Huang
,
Z.
, and
Jin
,
Y.
, 2009, “
Extension of Stress and Strength Interference Theory for Conceptual Design-for-Reliability
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
131
, p.
071001
.
19.
Evan
,
M.
, and
Moshonov
,
H.
, 2006, “
Checking for Prior-Data Conflict
,”
Bayesian Anal.
,
4
, pp.
893
914
20.
Pearson
,
E. S.
, 1947, “
The Choice of Statistical Tests Illustrated on the Interpretation of Data Classed in a 2 × 2 Table
,”
Biometrika
,
34
, pp.
139
167
.
21.
Plackett
,
R. L.
, 1983, “
Karl Pearson and the Chi-Square Test
,”
Int. Statist. Rev.
,
51
(
1
), pp.
59
72
.
You do not currently have access to this content.