Advances in innovation processes are critically important as economic and business landscapes evolve. There are many concept generation techniques that can assist a designer in the initial phases of design. Unfortunately, few studies have examined these techniques that can provide evidence to suggest which techniques should be preferred or how to implement them in an optimal way. This study systematically investigates the underlying factors of four common and well-documented techniques: brainsketching, gallery, 6-3-5, and C-sketch. These techniques are resolved into their key parameters, and a rigorous factorial experiment is performed to understand how the key parameters affect the outcomes of the techniques. The factors chosen for this study with undergraduate mechanical engineers include how concepts are displayed to participants (all are viewed at once or subsets are exchanged between participants, i.e., “rotational viewing”) and the mode used to communicate ideas (written words only, sketches only, or a combination of written words and sketches). Four metrics are used to evaluate the data: quantity, quality, novelty, and variety. The data suggest that rotational viewing of sets of concepts described using sketches combined with words produces more ideas than having all concepts displayed in a “gallery view” form, but a gallery view results in more high quality concepts. These results suggest that a hybrid of methods should be used to maximize the quality and number of ideas. The study also shows that individuals gain a significant number of ideas from their teammates. Ideas, when shared, can foster new idea tracks, more complete layouts, and a diverse synthesis. Finally, as teams develop more concepts, the quality of the concepts improves. This result is a consequence of the team-sharing environment and, in conjunction with the quantity of ideas, validates the effectiveness of group idea generation. This finding suggests a way to go beyond the observation that some forms of brainstorming can actually hurt productivity.
Skip Nav Destination
e-mail: jlinsey@tamu.edu
e-mail: emily.clauss@gmail.com
e-mail: tolga@mail.utexas.edu
e-mail: jmurphy101@hotmail.com
e-mail: wood@mail.utexas.edu
e-mail: markman@psy.utexas.edu
Article navigation
March 2011
Research Papers
An Experimental Study of Group Idea Generation Techniques: Understanding the Roles of Idea Representation and Viewing Methods
J. S. Linsey,
J. S. Linsey
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
e-mail: jlinsey@tamu.edu
Texas A&M University
, 3123 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843
Search for other works by this author on:
E. F. Clauss,
E. F. Clauss
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
e-mail: emily.clauss@gmail.com
The University of Texas at Austin
, 1 University Station, M/C C2200, Austin, TX 78712
Search for other works by this author on:
T. Kurtoglu,
T. Kurtoglu
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
e-mail: tolga@mail.utexas.edu
The University of Texas at Austin
, 1 University Station, M/C C2200, Austin, TX 78712
Search for other works by this author on:
J. T. Murphy,
J. T. Murphy
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
e-mail: jmurphy101@hotmail.com
The University of Texas at Austin
, 1 University Station, M/C C2200, Austin, TX 78712
Search for other works by this author on:
K. L. Wood,
K. L. Wood
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
e-mail: wood@mail.utexas.edu
The University of Texas at Austin
, 1 University Station, M/C C2200, Austin, TX 78712
Search for other works by this author on:
A. B. Markman
A. B. Markman
Department of Psychology,
e-mail: markman@psy.utexas.edu
The University of Texas at Austin
, 1 University Station, M/C A8000, Austin, TX 78712
Search for other works by this author on:
J. S. Linsey
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Texas A&M University
, 3123 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843e-mail: jlinsey@tamu.edu
E. F. Clauss
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
The University of Texas at Austin
, 1 University Station, M/C C2200, Austin, TX 78712e-mail: emily.clauss@gmail.com
T. Kurtoglu
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
The University of Texas at Austin
, 1 University Station, M/C C2200, Austin, TX 78712e-mail: tolga@mail.utexas.edu
J. T. Murphy
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
The University of Texas at Austin
, 1 University Station, M/C C2200, Austin, TX 78712e-mail: jmurphy101@hotmail.com
K. L. Wood
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
The University of Texas at Austin
, 1 University Station, M/C C2200, Austin, TX 78712e-mail: wood@mail.utexas.edu
A. B. Markman
Department of Psychology,
The University of Texas at Austin
, 1 University Station, M/C A8000, Austin, TX 78712e-mail: markman@psy.utexas.edu
J. Mech. Des. Mar 2011, 133(3): 031008 (15 pages)
Published Online: March 10, 2011
Article history
Received:
October 5, 2009
Revised:
December 19, 2010
Online:
March 10, 2011
Published:
March 10, 2011
Citation
Linsey, J. S., Clauss, E. F., Kurtoglu, T., Murphy, J. T., Wood, K. L., and Markman, A. B. (March 10, 2011). "An Experimental Study of Group Idea Generation Techniques: Understanding the Roles of Idea Representation and Viewing Methods." ASME. J. Mech. Des. March 2011; 133(3): 031008. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4003498
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
A Dataset Generation Framework for Symmetry-Induced Mechanical Metamaterials
J. Mech. Des (April 2025)
Related Articles
Editorial
J. Mech. Des (March,2005)
Designing Medical Devices for the Developing World: Best Practices and Hands-on Approaches in D-Lab Health
J. Med. Devices (June,2010)
An Investigation on the Implications of Design Process Phases on Artifact Novelty
J. Mech. Des (May,2015)
Engineering Design: A Foundation for a 21st Century Renaissance
J. Mech. Des (July,2011)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Producibility Engineering
Manufacturing Engineering: Principles for Optimization, Third Edition
A PSA Update to Reflect Procedural Changes (PSAM-0217)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Modeling of SAMG Operator Actions in Level 2 PSA (PSAM-0164)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)