Product take-back and reuse is sometimes at odds with the rapidly evolving desires of some customers. For other customers, the environmental benefits of reuse more than compensate for minor drawbacks. “Selling a service” (rather than a product) through leasing enables the manufacturer to control the timing and quality of product take-back but current methods assume a fixed leasing period. What is needed is a method for fine tuning the time span of customers’ life cycles in order to provide each market segment the combination of features it most desires. This paper presents a new method for performing long range product planning so that the manufacturer can determine optimal take-back times, end-of-life design decisions, and number of lifecycles. The method first determines a Pareto optimal frontier over price, environmental impact and reliability using a genetic algorithm. Then, a multiattribute utility function is employed to maximize utility across different segments of the market and also across different lifecycles within each segment. Post-optimal studies help determine feasibility of component redesign in addition to parts consolidation. The proposed method is illustrated through an example involving personal computers.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Keywords:
environmental factors, genetic algorithms, leasing, Pareto optimisation, planning, product life cycle management, recycling, reliability, remaining life assessment
Topics:
Cycles, Design, Reliability, Computers, Recycling
1.
European Union Directive
, 1999, “
Landfill of Waste
,” Council Directive 1999/31/EC, Official Journal of the European Communities, Apr. 26, L182, Vol.
42
, 16.7.1999, pp.
1
–
19
.
2.
European Union Directive
, 2002, “
Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE)
,” Directive 2002/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Official Journal L 037, Jan. 27, 13/02/2003, pp.
0024
–
0039
.
3.
Williams
,
J.
,
Shu
,
L.
, and
Murayama
,
T.
, 2000, “
Current Status of Extended Producer Responsibility Legislation and Effects on Product Design
,”
Proceedings of ASME Japan–USA Symposium on Flexible Automation
, Ann Arbor, MI.
4.
Guide
,
V. D. R.
, 2000, “
Production Planning and Control for Remanufacturing: Industry Practice and Research Needs
,”
J. Operations Manage.
0272-6963,
18
(
4
), pp.
467
–
483
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
5.
White
,
C.
,
Masanet
,
E.
,
Rosen
,
C.
, and
Beckman
,
S.
, 2003, “
Product Recovery With Some Byte: An Overview of Management Challenges and Environmental Consequences in Reverse Manufacturing for the Computer Industry
,”
J. Cleaner Prod.
0959-6526,
11
, pp.
445
–
458
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
6.
Mangun
,
D.
, and
Thurston
,
D. L.
, 2002, “
Incorporating Component Reuse, Remanufacture and Recycle into Product Portfolio Design
,”
IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage.
0018-9391,
49
(
4
), pp.
479
–
490
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
7.
Ishii
,
K.
,
Eubanks
,
C. F.
, and
DiMarco
,
P.
, 1994, “
Design for Product Retirement and Material Life-Cycle
,”
Mater. Des.
0264-1275,
15
(
4
), pp.
225
–
233
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
8.
King
,
A. M.
,
Stuart
,
C. B.
,
Winnie
,
I.
, and
Chris
,
A. M.
, 2006, “
Reducing Waste: Repair, Recondition, Remanufacture or Recycle?
,”
Sustain. Dev.
,
14
(
4
), pp.
257
–
267
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
9.
Rose
,
C. M.
,
Kurt
,
A. B.
, and
Ishii
,
K.
, 1999, “
Determining End-of-Life Strategies as a Part of Product Definition, ISEE-1999
,”
Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment
, pp.
219
–
224
.
10.
González
,
B.
, and
Adenso-Diaz
,
B.
, 2005, “
A Bill of Materials-Based Approach for EOL Decision Making in Design for the Environment
,”
Int. J. Prod. Res.
0020-7543,
43
(
10
), pp.
2071
–
2099
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
11.
Lambert
,
A. J. D.
, and
Gupta
,
S. M.
, 2005,
Disassembly Modeling for Assembly, Maintenance, Reuse, and Recycling
,
CRC Press
,
Boca Raton, FL
.
12.
Behdad
,
S.
,
Kwak
,
M.
,
Kim
,
H.
, and
Thurston
,
D.
, 2010, “
Simultaneous Selective Disassembly and End-of-Life Decision Making for Multiple Products That Share Disassembly Operations
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
132
(
4
), p.
041002
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
13.
Peng
,
Q.
, and
Chung
,
C.
, 2007, “
Selected Disassembly Planning for Product Maintainability
,”
Proceedings of ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences
, Las Vegas NV.
14.
Xing
,
K.
, and
Belusko
,
M.
, 2008, “
Design for Upgradability Algorithm: Configuring Durable Products for Competitive Reutilization
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
130
(
11
), p.
111102
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
15.
Dunmade
,
I.
, 2006, “
Design for Multi-lifecycle: A Sustainable Design Concept Applied to an Agro-Industrial Development Project
,”
2006 ASAE Annual Meeting
, Paper No. 068059.
16.
Zhou
,
M.
,
Caudill
,
R.
,
Sebastian
,
D.
,
Zhang
,
B.
, “
Multi-Lifecycle Product Recovery for Electronic Products
,” 1999,
J. Electron. Manuf.
0960-3131,
9
(
1
), pp.
1
–
15
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
18.
Shu
,
L. H.
, and
Flowers
,
W. C.
, 1998, “
Reliability Modeling in Design for Remanufacture
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
120
(
4
), pp.
620
–
627
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
19.
Jiang
,
Z. H.
,
Shu
,
L. H.
, and
Benhabib
,
B.
, 2000, “
Reliability Analysis of Non-Constant-Size Part Populations in Design for Remanufacture
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
122
(
2
), pp.
172
–
178
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
20.
Kara
,
S.
,
Mazhar
,
M. I.
, and
Kaebernick
,
H.
, 2004, “
Lifetime Prediction of Components for Reuse: An Overview
,”
Int. J. Environ. Technol. Manage.
1466-2132,
4
(
4
), pp.
323
–
348
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
21.
Lund
,
R.
, 1998, “
Remanufacturing: An American Resource
,”
Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress Environmentally Conscious Design and Manufacturing
, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, Jun. 16–17.
23.
Yuzo
,
H.
,
Takayuki
,
N.
, and
Toshijiro
,
O.
, 2001,
Recyclability Evaluation Method (REM) and Its Applications
,
Second International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing (EcoDesign'01)
, p.
315
.
24.
Desai
,
A.
, and
Mital
,
A.
, 2003, “
Evaluation of Disassemblability to Enable Design for Disassembly in Mass Production
,”
Int. J. Ind. Ergonom.
0169-8141,
32
, pp.
265
–
281
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
25.
Ishii
,
K.
, 1996, “
Materials Selection Issues in Design for Recyclability
,”
Proceedings of the Second International Ecobalance Conference
, Tsukuba, Japan.
26.
Chick
,
A.
, and
Micklethwaite
,
P.
, 2003, “
Recycled Tigers’ Teeth?: Obstacles to UK Designers Specifying Recycled Products and Materials
,”
Fifth European Academy of Design Conference
, Barcelona, Spain, Apr. 28–30.
27.
Hammond
,
R.
,
Amezquita
,
T.
, and
Bras
,
B. A.
, 1998, “
Issues in the Automotive Parts Remanufacturing Industry: Discussion of Results From Surveys Performed Among Remanufacturers
,”
International Journal of Engineering Design and Automation
- Special issue on Environmentally Conscious Design and Manufacturing,
4
(
1
), pp.
27
–
46
.
28.
PRé Consultants Company, 2010 SimaPro LCA software, http://www.pre.nl/simapro/http://www.pre.nl/simapro/
29.
Pandey
,
V.
, and
Thurston
,
D.
, 2007, “
Non-Dominated Strategies for Decision Based Design for Product Reuse
,”
Proceedings of ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences
, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
30.
Goldberg
,
D. E.
, 1989,
Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning
,
Addison-Wesley
,
New York
.
31.
Zitzler
,
E.
,
Deb
,
K.
, and
Thiele
,
L.
, 2000, “
Comparison of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: Empirical Results
,”
Evol. Comput.
1063-6560,
8
(
2
), pp.
173
–
195
.
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
32.
Deb
,
K.
, 2001,
Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms
,
Wiley
,
Chichester, UK
.
33.
Deb
,
K.
,
Pratap
,
A.
,
Agrawal
,
S.
, and
Meyarivan
,
T.
, 2002, “
A Fast Elitist Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Multi-Objective Optimization: NSGA-II
,”
IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput.
1089-778X,
6
(
2
), pp.
182
–
197
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
34.
Jolly
,
M.
,
Winward
,
P.
,
Pandey
,
V.
, and
Thurston
,
D. L.
, 2006, “
Mass Customization Optimization Using Social Network Based Product Architecture Representation
,”
Proceedings of ASME 2006 IDETC/CIE
, Philadelphia, Sep. 10–13.
35.
Natural Resources Council of Maine
, 2008, “
Maine’s E-Waste Program
,” Progress Report On Maine’s Electronic Waste Law, http://www.nrcm.org/doc uments/ewaste_report2008.pdfhttp://www.nrcm.org/doc uments/ewaste_report2008.pdf
36.
Pandey
,
V.
, and
Thurston
,
D.
, 2009, “
Effective Age of Remanufactured Products: An Entropy Approach
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
131
(
3
), p.
031008
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
37.
Li
,
H.
, and
Azram
,
S.
, 2002, “
An Approach for Product Line Design Selection Under Uncertainty and Competition
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
124
(
3
), pp.
385
–
392
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
38.
Wassenaar
,
H. J.
, and
Chen
,
W.
, 2003, “
An Approach to Decision-Based Design With Discrete Choice Analysis for Demand Modeling
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
125
(
3
), pp.
490
–
497
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
39.
Keeney
,
R.
, and
Raiffa
,
H.
, 1993,
Decisions With Multiple Objectives
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
.
Copyright © 2010
 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.