An efficient method for a structural reliability analysis is proposed under the Bayesian framework, which can deal with the epistemic uncertainty arising from a limited amount of data. Until recently, conventional reliability analyses dealt mostly with the aleatory uncertainty, which is related to the inherent physical randomness and its statistical properties are completely known. In reality, however, epistemic uncertainties are prevalent, which makes the existing methods less useful. In the Bayesian approach, the probability itself is treated as a random variable of a beta distribution conditional on the provided data, which is determined by conducting a double loop of reliability analyses. The Kriging dimension reduction method is employed to promote efficient implementation of the reliability analysis, which can construct the PDF of the limit state function with favorable accuracy using a small number of analyses. Mathematical examples are used to demonstrate the proposed method. An engineering design problem is also addressed, which is to find an optimum design of a pigtail spring in a vehicle suspension, taking material uncertainty due to limited test data into account.

1.
Haldar
,
A.
, and
Mahadevan
,
S.
, 2000,
Probability, Reliability, and Statistical Methods in Engineering Design
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
2.
Noor
,
A. K.
, 2005, “
Perspectives on Nondeterministic Approaches
,”
Engineering Design Reliability Handbook
,
E.
Nikolaidis
,
D. M.
Ghiocel
, and
S.
Singhal
, eds.,
CRC Press LLC
,
Boca Raton, FL
.
3.
Helton
,
J. C.
, and
Oberkampf
,
W. L.
, 2004, “
Alternative Representations of Epistemic Uncertainty
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
0951-8320,
85
, pp.
1
10
.
4.
Nikolaidis
,
E.
, 2005, “
Types of Uncertainty in Design Decision Making
,”
Engineering Design Reliability Handbook
,
E.
Nikolaidis
,
D. M.
Ghiocel
, and
S.
Singhal
, eds.,
CRC Press LLC
,
Boca Raton, FL
.
5.
Zhou
,
J.
, and
Mourelatos
,
Z. P.
, 2008, “
A Sequential Algorithm for Possibility-Based Design Optimization
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
130
(
1
), p.
011001
.
6.
Du
,
L.
,
Choi
,
K. K.
, and
Youn
,
B. D.
, 2006, “
Inverse Possibility Analysis Method for Possibility Based Design Optimization
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
44
(
11
), pp.
2682
2690
.
7.
Du
,
X.
, 2008, “
Unified Uncertainty Analysis by the First Order Reliability Method
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
130
, p.
091401
.
8.
Mourelatos
,
Z. P.
, and
Zhou
,
J.
, 2006, “
A Design Optimization Method Using Evidence Theory
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
128
(
4
), pp.
901
908
.
9.
Zhang
,
R.
, and
Mahadevan
,
S.
, 2001, “
Integration of Computation and Testing for Reliability Estimation
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
0951-8320,
74
, pp.
13
21
.
10.
Gunawan
,
S.
, and
Papalambros
,
P. Y.
, 2006, “
A Bayesian Approach to Reliability-Based Optimization With Incomplete Information
,”
ASME 2006 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
, Philadelphia, Sep. 10–13.
11.
Mahadevan
,
S.
, and
Rebba
,
R.
, 2005, “
Validation of Reliability Computational Models Using Bayes Networks
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
0951-8320,
87
, pp.
223
32
.
12.
Cruse
,
T. A.
, and
Brown
,
J. M.
, 2007, “
Confidence Interval Simulation for Systems of Random Variables
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
129
, pp.
836
842
.
13.
Youn
,
B. D.
, and
Wang
,
P.
, 2008, “
Bayesian Reliability-Based Design Optimization Using Eigenvector Dimension Reduction (EDR) Method
,”
Struct. Multidiscip. Optim.
1615-147X,
36
(
2
), pp.
107
123
.
14.
Rahman
,
S.
, and
Xu
,
H.
, 2004, “
A Univariate Dimension-Reduction Method for Multi-Dimensional Integration in Stochastic Mechanics
,”
Probab. Eng. Mech.
0266-8920,
19
, pp.
393
408
.
15.
Won
,
J. H.
,
Choi
,
C. H.
, and
Choi
,
J. H.
, 2009, “
Improving the Dimension Reduction Method (DRM) in the Uncertainty Analysis and Application to the Reliability Based Design Optimization
,”
J. Mech. Sci. Technol.
1738-494X,
23
(
5
), pp.
1249
1260
.
16.
Kiureghian
,
A. D.
, and
Ditlevsen
,
O.
, 2009, “
Aleatory or Epistemic? Does It Matter?
,”
Struct. Safety
0167-4730,
31
(
2
), pp.
105
112
.
17.
Gelman
,
A.
,
Carlin
,
J. B.
,
Stern
,
H. S.
, and
Rubin
,
D. B.
, 2004,
Bayesian Data Analysis
, 2nd ed.,
Chapman and Hall
,
New York
.
18.
Santner
,
T.
,
Williams
,
B. J.
, and
William
,
I. N.
, 2003,
The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments
,
Springer
,
New York
.
19.
Etman
,
L. F. P.
, 1994, “
Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments: The Method of Sacks Et Al
,” Engineering Mechanics Report No. WFW 94.098, Eindhoven University of Technology.
20.
Sasena
,
M. J.
,
Papalambros
,
P.
, and
Goovaerts
,
P.
, 2002, “
Exploration of Metamodeling Sampling Criteria for Constrained Global Optimization
,”
Eng. Optimiz.
0305-215X,
34
, pp.
263
278
.
21.
Johnson
,
N. L.
,
Kotz
,
S.
, and
Balakrishnan
,
N.
, 1995,
Continuous Univariate Distributions
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
22.
Youn
,
B. D.
,
Zhimin
,
X.
, and
Wang
,
P.
, 2008, “
Eigenvector Dimension Reduction (EDR) Method for Sensitivity-Free Probability Analysis
,”
Struct. Multidiscip. Optim.
1615-147X,
37
(
1
), pp.
13
28
.
23.
O’Hagan
,
A.
, 2006, “
Bayesian Analysis of Computer Code Outputs: A Tutorial
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
0951-8320,
91
, pp.
1290
1300
.
24.
Wunsche
,
T.
,
Muhr
,
K. H.
,
Biecker
,
K.
, and
Schnaubelt
,
L.
, 1994, “
Side Load Springs as a Solution to Minimize Adverse Side Loads Acting on the McPherson Strut
,” SAE Paper No. 940862.
25.
Jeon
,
J. I.
,
Jang
,
E. S.
,
Kang
,
D. H.
,
Ryu
,
Y. I.
, and
Lee
,
H. S.
, 2007, “
Development of McPherson Strut Coil Spring With Reduced Side Load
,”
The Korean Society of Automotive Engineers Conference
, ChungNam, Korea, Nov. 22–24.
You do not currently have access to this content.