One of the greatest challenges in product development is creating a form that is aesthetically attractive to an intended market audience. Market research tools, such as consumer surveys, are well established for functional product features, but aesthetic preferences are as varied as the people that respond to them. Additionally, and possibly even more challenging, user feedback requires objective measurement and quantification of aesthetics and aesthetic preference. The common methods for quantifying aesthetics present respondents with metric scales over dimensions with abstract semantic labels like “strong” and “sexy.” Even if researchers choose the correct semantics to test, and even if respondents accurately record their responses on these semantic scales, the results on the semantic scales must be translated back into a product shape, where the designer must take the consumers’ numerical scores for a set of semantics and translate that into a form which consumers will find desirable. This translation presents a potential gap in understanding between the supply and demand sides of the marketplace. This gap between designer and user can be closed through objective methods to understand and quantify aesthetic preferences because the designer would have concrete directions to use as a foundation for development of the product form. Additionally, the quantification of aesthetic preference could be used by the designer as evidence to support certain product forms when engineering and manufacturing decisions are made that might adversely affect the aesthetics of the product form. This paper demonstrates how the qualitative attribute, form, cannot only be represented quantitatively, but also how customer preferences can be estimated as utility functions over the aesthetic space, so that new higher utility product forms can be proposed and explored. To do so, the form is summarized with underlying latent form characteristics, and these underlying characteristics are specified to be attributes in a utility function. Consumer surveys, created using design of experiments, are then used to capture an individual’s preference for the indicated attributes and thus the form. Once preference is summarized in the utility function, the utility function can be used as the basis for form generation and modification or design verification.
Skip Nav Destination
orsborns@mst.edu
cagan@cmu.edu
Close
Sign In or Register for Account
Article navigation
June 2009
Research Papers
Quantifying Aesthetic Form Preference in a Utility Function
Seth Orsborn,
Seth Orsborn
Department of Interdisciplinary Engineering,
orsborns@mst.edu
Missouri University of Science and Technology
, Rolla, MO 65409
Search for other works by this author on:
Jonathan Cagan,
Jonathan Cagan
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
cagan@cmu.edu
Carnegie Mellon University
, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
Search for other works by this author on:
Peter Boatwright
Peter Boatwright
Tepper School of Business,
boatwright@cmu.edu
Carnegie Mellon University
, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
Search for other works by this author on:
Seth Orsborn
Department of Interdisciplinary Engineering,
Missouri University of Science and Technology
, Rolla, MO 65409orsborns@mst.edu
Jonathan Cagan
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Carnegie Mellon University
, Pittsburgh, PA 15213cagan@cmu.edu
Peter Boatwright
J. Mech. Des. Jun 2009, 131(6): 061001 (10 pages)
Published Online: April 27, 2009
Article history
Received:
January 25, 2008
Revised:
March 9, 2009
Published:
April 27, 2009
Citation
Orsborn, S., Cagan, J., and Boatwright, P. (April 27, 2009). "Quantifying Aesthetic Form Preference in a Utility Function." ASME. J. Mech. Des. June 2009; 131(6): 061001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3116260
Download citation file:
- Ris (Zotero)
- Reference Manager
- EasyBib
- Bookends
- Mendeley
- Papers
- EndNote
- RefWorks
- BibTex
- ProCite
- Medlars
Close
Sign In
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Related Articles
A Co-Evolutionary Approach for Design Optimization via Ensembles of Surrogates With Application to Vehicle Crashworthiness
J. Mech. Des (January,2012)
The Impact of Sustainability on Consumer Preference Judgments of Product Attributes
J. Mech. Des (August,2015)
Eye-Tracking Data Predict Importance of Product Features and Saliency of Size Change
J. Mech. Des (August,2014)
Managing Design Excellence Tools During the Development of New Orthopaedic Implants
J Biomech Eng (November,2013)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Application of Experiment Design Method in System Simulation of Flight Vehicle
International Conference on Information Technology and Computer Science, 3rd (ITCS 2011)
Interactive Virtual Prototyping for Improving the Design of Consumer Products
Advances in Computers and Information in Engineering Research, Volume 1
Digital Human in Engineering and Bioengineering Applications
Advances in Computers and Information in Engineering Research, Volume 1