This paper studies “creativity” in engineering education, by examining the perception of instructors and students. We aim to identify factors that impede a creative environment (creativity blockers). The study entails a review of established research in the fields of psychology and educational psychology to identify factors which create an educational environment conducive to creativity. These factors are formalized in the Ten Maxims of Creativity in Education, a set of criteria that constitute an educational environment conducive to fostering creativity in students. These maxims form the basis for our work in examining the contemporary engineering education. Extensive surveys are designed, created, distributed, and statistically quantified to study the perceptions of engineering educators and students, in comparison to nonengineering educators and students. The results unfortunately show that current engineering students experience almost none of the Ten Maxims of Creativity as part of their academic experiences.

1.
Koehn
,
E.
, 1997, “
Engineering Perceptions of ABET Accreditation Criteria
,”
J. Profl. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract.
1052-3928,
123
(
2
), pp.
66
70
.
2.
Nowatzki
,
E.
, 1997, “
ABET in the Year 2000—Evolution or Extinction?
,”
J. Profl. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract.
1052-3928,
123
(
1
), pp.
3
4
.
3.
ABET
, 2004,
2005-2006 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs
,
Engineering Accreditation Commission
: Baltimore, MD.
4.
Catalano
,
G. D.
, 2006, “
Promoting Peace in Engineering Education: Modifying the ABET Criteria
,”
Science and Engineering Ethics
,
12
(
2
), pp.
399
406
.
5.
Shuman
,
L. J.
,
Besterfield-Sacre
,
M.
, and
McGourty
,
J.
, 2005, “
The ABET “Professional Skills”—Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed?
,”
J. Eng. Educ.
1069-4730,
94
(
1
), pp.
41
55
.
6.
Rover
,
D. T.
, 2004, “
Liberal Education in Twenty-First Century Engineering: Responses to ABET/EC 2000 Criteria
,”
J. Eng. Educ.
1069-4730,
93
(
2
), pp.
93
95
.
7.
Prados
,
J. W.
, 2004, “
Can ABET Really Make a Difference?
,”
Int. J. Electr. Eng. Educ.
0020-7209,
20
(
3
), pp.
315
317
.
8.
American Association of University Women
, 2006,
American Association of University Women
, http://www.aauw.orghttp://www.aauw.org.
9.
Guran
,
Y.
, 1997, “
Women in Engineering in the Age of Information Technology
,”
Global Journal of Engineering Education
,
1
(
1
); available at http://www.eng.monash.edu.au/non-cms/uicee/gjee/vol1no1/abstra13.htmhttp://www.eng.monash.edu.au/non-cms/uicee/gjee/vol1no1/abstra13.htm
10.
Shirley
,
D.
, 2006, “
Women in Engineering: Focus on Success
,”
The Bridge, National Academy of Engineering
,
29
(
2
), available at http://www.nae.edu/nae/bridgecom.nsf/weblinks/NAEW-4NHM972OpenDocumenthttp://www.nae.edu/nae/bridgecom.nsf/weblinks/NAEW-4NHM972OpenDocument
11.
Sternberg
,
R. J.
, and
Lubart
,
T. I.
, 1995,
Defying the Crowd: Cultivating Creativity in a Culture of Conformity
,
Free Press
, New York, pp.
ix
,
326
.
12.
Csikszentmihalyi
,
M.
, 1996,
Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention
. 1st ed.,
Harper Collins
, New York, pp.
viii
,
456
.
13.
Davis
,
G. A.
, 1999,
Creativity is Forever
,
Kendall/Hunt Publishing
, Dubuque, IA.
14.
Hennessey
,
B. A.
, 2004,
Developing Creativity in Gifted Children: The Central Importance of Motivation and Classroom Climate
, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented,
University of Connecticut
, Storrs, CT.
15.
Sternberg
,
R. J.
, 1998,
The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives
,
Cambridge University Press
, Cambridge, pp.
x
,
454
.
16.
Sternberg
,
R. J.
, 2000, “
Identifying and Developing Creative Giftedness
,”
Roeper Review
,
23
(
2
), pp.
60
64
.
17.
Amabile
,
T.
, 1983,
The Social Psychology of Creativity
,
Springer
, New York.
18.
Sternberg
,
R.
, 1999,
Handbook of Creativity
,
Cambridge University Press
, Cambridge.
19.
Hennessey
,
B. A.
, and
Amabile
,
T.
, 1988, “
Reward, Instrinsic Motivation, and Creativity
,”
Am. Psychol.
0003-066X,
53
(
6
), pp.
674
675
.
20.
Sternberg
,
R.
, 1985 “
Implicit Theories of Intelligence, Creativity and Wisdom
,”
J. Pers Soc. Psychol.
0022-3514,
49
(
3
), pp.
607
627
.
21.
Plucker
,
J.
, and
Beghetto
,
R.
, 2004, “
Why Isn’t Creativity More Important to Educational Psychologists? Potentials, Pitfalls, and Future
,”
Educ. Psychol.
0046-1520,
39
(
2
), pp.
83
96
.
22.
Adams
,
J.
, 1999, “
Inner Knowing: Consciousness, Creativity, Insight, and Intuition
,”
Library Journal
,
124
(
2
), pp.
110
111
.
23.
Adams
,
J.
, 1996, “
Creativity: How to Catch Lightning in a Bottle—Gamez G
,”
Library Journal
,
121
(
14
), pp.
196
197
.
24.
Plucker
,
J.
,
Beghetto
,
R.
, and
Dow
,
G.
, 2004 “
Why Isn’t Creativity More Important to Educational Psychologists? Potentials, Pitfalls, and Future.
,”
Educ. Psychol.
0046-1520,
39
(
2
), pp.
83
96
.
25.
Davis
,
M.
, and Association for Practical and Professional Ethics, 1998,
Thinking Like an Engineer: Studies in the Ethics of a Profession
, Practical and Professional Ethics Series,
Oxford University Press
, New York, pp. xii,
240
.
26.
Hadgraft
,
R. G.
, 1997, “
Building Creative, People-Oriented Departments
,”
Global Journal of Engineering Education
,
1
(
1
), available at http://www.eng.monash.edu.au/uicee/gjee/vol1no1/abstra15.htmhttp://www.eng.monash.edu.au/uicee/gjee/vol1no1/abstra15.htm
27.
Kelley
,
T.
, and
Littman
,
J.
, 2000,
The Art of Innovation: Lessons in Creativity from IDEO, America’s Leading Design Firm
,
Currency/Doubleday
, New York, p.
cm
.
28.
Standler
,
R. B.
, 1998,
Creativity in Science and Engineering
, p.
18
.
29.
Sternberg
,
R. J.
, and
Williams
,
W. M.
, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1996,
How to Develop Student Creativity
,
Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
, Alexandria, VA.
30.
Von Oech
,
R.
, 1990,
A Whack on the Side of the Head: How You Can Be More Creative
, Rev. ed.,
Warner Books
, New York, p.
196
.
31.
Wilde
,
D. J.
, 1993, “
Changes Among ASEE Creativity Workshop Participants
,”
J. Eng. Educ.
1069-4730,
82
(
3
),
167
170
.
32.
Thousand
,
J. S.
,
Villa
,
R. A.
, and
Nevin
,
A.
, 1994,
Creativity and Collaborative Learning: A Practical Guide to Empowering Students and Teachers
,
P.H. Brookes
, Baltimore, pp. xxvi,
420
.
33.
Conwell
,
J. C.
,
Catalano
,
G. D.
, and
Beard
,
J. E.
, 1993, “
A Case Study in Creative Problem Solving in Engineering Design
,”
J. Eng. Educ.
1069-4730,
82
(
4
),
18
24
.
34.
Fichter
,
M. M.
, 2004, “
Nurturing Creativity
,”
Verhaltenstherapie
,
14
(
4
), pp.
241
243
.
35.
Barak
,
M.
, and
Goffer
,
N.
, 2002, “
Fostering Systematic Innovative Thinking and Problem Solving: Lessons Education Can Learn From Industry
,”
International Journal of Technology and Design Education
,
12
(
3
), pp.
227
247
.
36.
Dennard
,
R. H.
, 2000, “
Creativity in the 2000s and beyond—Motivation and Leadership Remain Essential for Nurturing Creativity and Providing an Environment in Which It can Flourish
,”
Res. Technol. Manag.
0895-6308,
43
(
6
), p.
23
25
.
37.
Hennessey
,
B.
, and
Amabile
,
T.
, 1998, “
Reward, Intrinsic Motivation, and Creativity
,”
Am. Psychol.
0003-066X,
1988
(
53
), pp.
674
675
.
38.
Eisenberger
,
R.
, and
Armeli
,
S.
, 1997, “
Can Salient Reward Increase Creative Performance Without Reducing Intrinsic Creative Interest
,”
J. Pers Soc. Psychol.
0022-3514,
72
(
No 3
), pp.
652
663
.
39.
Eisenberger
,
R.
, and
Rhoades
,
L.
, 2001, “
Incremental Effects of Reward on Creativity
,”
J. Pers Soc. Psychol.
0022-3514,
81
(
4
), pp.
728
741
.
40.
Friedman
,
R.
, and
Forster
,
J.
, 2005, “
Effects of Motivational Cues on Perceptual Asymmetry: Implications for Creativity and Analytical Problem Solving
,”
J. Pers Soc. Psychol.
0022-3514,
88
(
2
), pp.
263
275
.
41.
Friedman
,
R.
, and
Forster
,
J.
, 2001, “
The Effects of Promotion and Prevention Cues on Creativity
,”
J. Pers Soc. Psychol.
0022-3514,
81
(
6
), pp.
1001
1013
.
42.
Crowe
,
C.
, and
Higgins
,
E. T.
, 1997, “
Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclination: Promotion and Prevention in Decision Making
,”
Org. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process
0749-5978,
1997
(
69
), pp.
117
132
.
43.
Alger
,
J. R. M.
, and
Hays
,
C. V.
, 1964,
Creative Synthesis in Design
,
Prentice-Hall
, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
44.
Gregory
,
S. A.
, 1972,
Creativity and Innovation in Engineering
,
Butterworths
, London.
45.
Cropley
,
D. H.
, and
Cropley
,
A. J.
, 2000, “
Fostering Creativity in Engineering Undergraduates
,”
High Ability Studies, The Journal of the European Council for High Ability
,
11
(
2
), pp.
207
219
.
46.
Chang
,
P. F.
,
et al.
, 2000, “
The Development and Implementation of the Technological Creativity Course: An Interdisciplinary Approach
,” 2000 International Conference of Engineering Education,
ICEE 2000 Conference Proceedings
, Taipei, Taiwan.
47.
Wallas
,
G.
, 1926,
The Art of Thought
,
Harcourt Brace
, New York.
48.
Stouffer
,
W. B.
,
Russel
,
J.
, and
Oliva
,
M. G.
, 2004, “
Making the Strange Familiar: Creativity and the Future of Engineering Education
,”
Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
,
American Society for Engineering Education
, Salt Lake City, UT.
49.
Kraft
,
U.
, 2005, “
Unleashing Creativity
,” Scientific American Mind (April), Vol.
16
(
1
),
16
23
.
50.
Foley
,
S. M.
, 2006,
Determining Barriers to Creativity in Engineering Education
, in Mechanical Engineering Department,
University of Connecticut
, Storrs, CT.
51.
Kazerounian
,
K.
, and
Foley
,
S.
, 2007, “
Barriers to Creativity in Engineering Education
,”
Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences
, Miami, Las Vegas.
You do not currently have access to this content.