This paper presents a pattern-based decomposition methodology for rapid redesign to support design customization in agile manufacturing of evolutionary products. The methodology has three functional phases. The first phase, called design dependency analysis, systematizes and reorganizes the intrinsic coupling structure of a given existing design model that is represented using the design dependency matrix. The second phase, called redesign partitioning analysis, generates alternative redesign pattern solutions to form a solution selection space through a three-stage procedure. The third phase, called pattern selection analysis, finds an optimal redesign pattern solution that entails the least potential redesign effort (in the subsequent solution process). Each pattern solution identifies and delimits the portions of the design model that need to be recomputed, thus expediting the redesign solution process. In such a way, one can treat the recomputation of the entire model, which is a conventional and computation-expensive solution approach, only as the last resort to solve the redesign problem given. An example redesign problem is used for the methodology illustration.

1.
Chen
,
L.
, and
Li
,
S.
, 2005, “
Analysis of Decomposability and Complexity for Design Problems in the Context of Decomposition
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
1050-0472,
127
, pp.
545
557
.
2.
King
,
J. R.
, 1980, “
Machine-Component Grouping Formation in Group Technology
,”
Manage. Sci.
0025-1909,
8
, pp.
193
199
.
3.
Kusiak
,
A.
, and
Cheng
,
C. H.
, 1990, “
A Branch-and-Bound Algorithm for Solving Group Technology Problems
,”
Ann. Operat. Res.
0254-5330,
26
, pp.
415
431
.
4.
Michelena
,
N. F.
, and
Papalambros
,
P. Y.
, 1995, “
Optimal Model-Based Decomposition of Powertrain System Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
1050-0472,
117
, pp.
499
505
.
5.
Chen
,
L.
,
Ding
,
Z.
, and
Li
,
S.
, 2005, “
A Formal Two-Phase Method for Decomposition of Complex Design Problems
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
1050-0472,
127
, pp.
184
195
.
6.
Chen
,
L.
,
Ding
,
Z.
, and
Li
,
S.
, 2005, “
Tree-Based Dependency Analysis in Decomposition and Re-decomposition of Complex Design Problems
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
1050-0472,
127
, pp.
12
23
.
7.
Steward
,
D. V.
, 1981, “
The Design Structure System: A Method for Managing the Design of Complex Systems
,”
IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage.
0018-9391,
28
, pp.
71
74
.
8.
Baldwin
,
C. Y.
, and
Clark
,
K. B.
, 2000,
Design Rules: the Power of Modularity
, Vol.
1
,
MIT Press
,
Cambridge, MA
.
9.
Browning
T. R.
, 2001, “
Applying the Design Structure Matrix to System Decomposition and Integration Problems: A Review and New Directions
,”
IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage.
0018-9391,
48
, pp.
292
306
.
10.
Ollinger
,
G. A.
, and
Stahovich
,
T. F.
, 2004, “
RedesignIT—A Model-based Tool for Managing Design Changes
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
1050-0472,
126
, pp.
208
216
.
11.
Li
,
S.
, and
Chen
,
L.
, 2005, “
Towards Rapid Redesign: Pattern-based Redesign Planning for Large-scale and Complex Redesign Problems
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
1050-0472, to be published.
12.
Kannapan
,
S. M.
, and
Marshek
,
K. M.
, 1992, “
An Approach to Parametric Machine Design and Negotiation in Concurrent Engineering
,”
Concurrent Engineering: Automation, Tools and Techniques
,
Kusiak
,
A.
, ed.,
Wiley
,
New York
, pp.
509
533
.
13.
Macwan
,
A.
, 2004, “
Pattern-based Decomposition Method and Partitioning Analysis for Complex Redesign Problems
,” M. A. Sc. thesis, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto.
14.
Shannon
,
C. E.
, 1948, “
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
,”
Bell Syst. Tech. J.
0005-8580,
27
, pp.
379
623
.
15.
Suh
,
N. P.
, 1990,
The Principles of Design
,
Oxford University Press
,
London
.
16.
Li
,
S.
, 2005, “
A Formal Decomposition-based Redesign Methodology for Rapid Design Customization
,” Ph. D. thesis, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto.
You do not currently have access to this content.