In this paper, the singularity loci of a special class of spherical 3-DOF parallel manipulators with prismatic actuators are studied. Concise analytical expressions describing the singularity loci are obtained in the joint and in the Cartesian spaces by using the expression of the determinant of the Jacobian matrix and the inverse kinematics of the manipulators. It is well known that there exist three different types of singularities for parallel manipulators, each having a different physical interpretation. In general, the singularity of type II is located inside the Cartesian workspace and leads to the instability of the end-effector. Therefore, it is important to be able to identify the configurations associated with this type of singularity and to find their locus in the space of all configurations. For the class of manipulators studied here, the six general cases and the five special cases of singularities are discussed. It is shown that the singularity loci in the Cartesian space (defined by the three Euler angles) are six independent planes. In the joint space (defined by the length of the three input links), the singularity loci are quadric surfaces, such as hyperboloid, sphere or a degenerated line or a degenerated circle. In addition, the three-dimensional graphical representations of the singular configurations in each of the general and special cases are illustrated. The description of the singular configurations provided here has great significance for robot trajectory planning and control.

1.
Gosselin
,
C.
, and
Angeles
,
J.
,
1990
, “
Singularity Analysis of Closed-Loop Kinematic Chains
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
,
6
(
3
), pp.
281
290
.
2.
Zlatanov, D., Fenton, R. G., and Benhabib, B., 1994, “Singularity Analysis of Mechanisms and Manipulators via a Motion-Space Model of the Instantaneous Kinematics,” Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. On Robotics and Automation, San Diego, May, pp. 986–991.
3.
Zlatanov, D., Bonev, I. A., and Gosselin, C., 2002, “Constraint Singularities of Parallel Mechanisms,” Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Washington DC, May.
4.
Sefrioui
,
J.
, and
Gosselin
,
C.
,
1993
, “
Singularity Analysis and Representation of Planar Parallel Manipulator
,”
Journal of Robotics and Autonomous Systems
,
10
(
4
), pp.
209
224
.
5.
Sefrioui
,
J.
, and
Gosselin
,
C.
,
1995
, “
On the Quadratic Nature of the Singularity Curves of Planar Three-Degree-of-Freedom Parallel Manipulators
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
30
(
4
), pp.
533
551
.
6.
Gosselin
,
C.
, and
Wang
,
J.
,
1997
, “
Singularity Loci of Planar Parallel Manipulators with Revolute Actuators
,”
Journal of Robotics and Autonomous Systems
,
21
, pp.
377
398
.
7.
Bonev, I. A., and Gosselin, C. M., 2001, “Singularity Loci of Planar Parallel Manipulators with Revolute Joints,” 2nd Workshop on Computational Kinematics, Seoul, South Korea, pp. 291–299, May 20–22.
8.
Merlet
,
J.-P.
,
1989
, “
Singular Configurations of Parallel Manipulators and Grassmann Geometry
,”
Int. J. Robot. Res.
,
8
(
5
), pp.
45
56
.
9.
Hunt
,
K. H.
,
1983
, “
Structural Kinematics of In-Parallel-Actuated Robot Arms
,”
ASME J. Mech. Transm., Autom. Des.
,
105
(
4
), pp.
705
712
.
10.
Fichter
,
E. F.
,
1986
, “
A Stewart Platform-Based Manipulator: General Theory and Practical Construction
,”
Int. J. Robot. Res.
,
5
(
2
), pp.
157
182
.
11.
Huang
,
Z.
,
Zhao
,
Y. S.
,
Wang
,
J.
, and
Yu
,
J. J.
,
1999
, “
Kinematic Principle and Geometrical Condition of General-Linear-Complex Special Configuration of Parallel Manipulators
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
34
(
8
), pp.
1171
1186
.
12.
Craver, W. M., 1989, “Structural Analysis and Design of a Three-Degree-of-Freedom Robotic Shoulder Module,” Master’s thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, Department of Mechanical Engineering.
13.
Gosselin
,
C.
, and
Angeles
,
J.
,
1989
, “
The Optimum Kinematic Design of a Spherical Three-Degree-of-Freedom Parallel Manipulator
,”
ASME J. Mech., Transm., Autom., Des.
,
111
(
2
), pp.
202
207
.
14.
Gosselin
,
C. M.
, and
Lavoie
,
E.
,
1993
, “
On the Kinematic Design of Spherical 3-DOF Parallel Manipulators
,”
Int. J. Robot. Res.
,
12
(
4
), pp.
394
402
.
15.
Innocenti
,
C.
, and
Parenti-Castelli
,
V.
,
1993
, “
Echelon Form Solution of Direct Kinematics for the General Fully-Parallel Spherical Wrist
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
28
, pp.
553
561
.
16.
Gosselin
,
C. M.
,
Sefrioui
,
J.
, and
Richard
,
M. J.
,
1994
, “
On the Direct Kinematics of Spherical 3-DOF Parallel Manipulators with a Coplanar Platform
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
116
(
2
), pp.
587
593
.
17.
Gosselin
,
C. M.
,
Sefrioui
,
J.
, and
Richard
,
M. J.
,
1994
, “
On the Direct Kinematics of Spherical 3-DOF Parallel Manipulators of General Architecture
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
116
(
2
), pp.
594
598
.
18.
Wohlhart
,
K.
,
1994
, “
Displacement Analysis of the General Spherical Stewart Platform
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
29
(
4
), pp.
581
589
.
19.
Gosselin, C., and Hamel, J., 1994, “The Agile Eye: A High-Performance Three-Degree-of-Freedom Camera-Orienting Device,” Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. On Robotics and Automation, San Diego, May, pp. 781–786.
20.
Gosselin, C., and Gagne´, M., 1995, “A Closed-Form Solution for the Direct Kinematics of a Special Class of Spherical Three-Degree-of-Freedom Parallel Manipulators,” Proc. of the Second Workshop on Computational Kinematics, Sophia Antipolis, France, September, pp. 231–240.
21.
Gosselin
,
C.
, and
Wang
,
J.
,
2002
, “
Singularity Loci of a Special Class of Spherical 3-DOF Parallel Mechanisms With Revolute Actuators
,”
Int. J. Robot. Res.
,
21
(
7
), pp.
649
659
.
22.
Kong, X. W., 1998, “Forward Displacement Analysis of Three New Classes of Analytic Spherical Parallel Manipulators,” Proc. of ASME DETC/MECH-5953.
23.
Gosselin, C. M., and Sefrioui, J., 1992, “Determination of the Singularity Loci of Spherical Three-Degree-of-Freedom Parallel Manipulators,” Proc. of ASME Mech. Conf, pp. 329–336.
24.
Sefrioui
,
J.
, and
Gosselin
,
C.
,
1994
, “
E´tude et repre´sentation des lieux de singularite´ des manipulateurs paralleles sphe´riques a trois degre´s de liberte´ avec actionneurs prismatiques
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
29
(
4
), pp.
559
579
.