The stiffness of a rigid body subject to conservative forces and moments is described by a tensor, whose components are best described by a 6×6 Cartesian stiffness matrix. We derive an expression that is independent of the parameterization of the motion of the rigid body using methods of differential geometry. The components of the tensor with respect to a basis of twists are given by evaluating the tensor on a pair of basis twists. We show that this tensor depends on the choice of an affine connection on the Lie group, $SE3.$ In addition, we show that the definition of the Cartesian stiffness matrix used in the literature [1,2] implicitly assumes an asymmetric connection and this results in an asymmetric stiffness matrix in a general loaded configuration. We prove that by choosing a symmetric connection we always obtain a symmetric Cartesian stiffness matrix. Finally, we derive stiffness matrices for different connections and illustrate the calculations using numerical examples.

1.
Ciblak, N., and Lipkin; H., “
Asymmetric Cartesian Stiffness for the Modeling of Compliant Robotic Systems,” in Proc. of the 23rd Biennial ASME Mechanisms Conf., Minneapolis, MN, 1994.
2.
Howard
,
W. S.
,
Zˇefran
,
M.
, and
Kumar
,
V.
,
1998
, “
On the 6×6 Stiffness Matrix for Three Dimensional Motions
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
33
, No.
4
, pp.
389
408
.
3.
Griffis
,
M.
, and
Duffy
,
J.
,
1993
, “
Global Stiffness Modeling of a Class of Simple Compliant Couplings
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
28
, No.
2
, pp.
207
224
.
4.
Kumar
,
V.
, and
Waldron
,
K. J.
,
1990
, “
Force Distribution in Walking Vehicles
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
112
, No.
1
, pp.
90
99
.
5.
Loncaric, J., 1991. “Elastic Systems and Quasistatic Grasp Stability,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Sacramento, CA.
6.
Howell
,
L. L.
, and
Midha
,
A.
,
1995
, “
Parametric Approximations for End-Loaded, Large-Deflection Beams in Compliant Mechanisms
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
117
, pp.
156
165
.
7.
Karger, A., and Novak, J., 1985, Space Kinematics and Lie Groups. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.
8.
Cartan
,
E.
, and
Schouten
,
J. A.
,
1926
. “
On the Geometry of the Group Manifold of Simple and Semi-Simple Groups
,”
Proceedings of the Akad. Wetensch. Amsterdam
29
, pp.
803
815
.
9.
Murray, R. M., Li, Z., and Sastry, S. S., 1994. A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation, CRC Press.
10.
McCarthy, J. M., 1990. An Introduction to Theoretical Kinematics. MIT Press.
11.
do Carmo, M. P., 1992. Riemannian Geometry. Birkhauser, Boston.
12.
Simo
,
J. C.
,
1992
, “
The (Symmetric) Hessian for Geometrically Nonlinear Models in Solid Mechanics: Intrinsic Definition and Geometric Interpretation
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
,
96
, No.
2
, pp.
189
200
.
13.
Paul, Richard P., 1981, Robot Manipulators: Mathematics, Programming, and Control, The MIT Press.
14.
Howard, W. S., 1995. “Stability of Grasped Objects: Beyond Force Closure.” PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
15.
Zˇefran
,
M.
,
Kumar
,
V.
, and
Croke
,
C.
,
1999
. “
Metrics and Connections for Rigid Body Kinematics
,”
Int. J. Robot. Res.
,
18
, No.
2
, pp.
243
258
.
You do not currently have access to this content.