Product development firms continually struggle to simultaneously keep product cost low while increasing product quality. This paper focuses on variation and its impact on the quality-failure costs—scrap, rework, extra labor, customer dissatisfaction, and product returns. In many cases, reducing quality failures requires an increase in product cost. Balancing these two costs is challenging because perfect information about process variability is rarely, if ever, available. As a result of process variation uncertainty, there is no clear optimal solution to the quality-failure cost/unit cost tradeoff. The author has observed that companies take one of two approaches to this dilemma: optimistic or pessimistic. The optimistic approach risks high rework costs to ensure the lowest cost product. On the other hand, the pessimistic approach forgoes potential unit cost reductions to avoid any quality failure. This paper presents a utility theory model of decision making under process capability uncertainty. This model is used to describe why either approach can be optimal depending on the organization, market, and product characteristics. In addition, information value theory is applied to explain the relative value of process capability information and variation reduction in the two approaches. The paper uses a frequently encountered design scenario to demonstrate the approach. In addition, a variety of other examples from industry are used to describe how the theory can be applied.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2001
Technical Papers
Optimism vs. Pessimism: Design Decisions in the Face of Process Capability Uncertainty
Anna C. Thornton, Assistant Professor,
Anna C. Thornton, Assistant Professor,
Mechanical Engineering, MIT 77 Mass Ave. Room 3-449 Cambridge, MA 02139
Search for other works by this author on:
Anna C. Thornton, Assistant Professor,
Mechanical Engineering, MIT 77 Mass Ave. Room 3-449 Cambridge, MA 02139
Contributed by the Design Theory & Methodology Committee for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received October 1998. Associate Editor: J. Cagan.
J. Mech. Des. Sep 2001, 123(3): 313-321 (9 pages)
Published Online: October 1, 1998
Article history
Received:
October 1, 1998
Citation
Thornton, A. C. (October 1, 1998). "Optimism vs. Pessimism: Design Decisions in the Face of Process Capability Uncertainty ." ASME. J. Mech. Des. September 2001; 123(3): 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1371774
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Related Articles
Reliability-Based Optimization of Multi-Component Welded Structures
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (November,1994)
Certification of Marine Energy Converters: The Experience so Far
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (November,2008)
On Shaping With Motion
J. Mech. Des (December,2000)
Assessing Circularity in Three Dimensions
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (February,2001)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Getting Ready for Production
Total Quality Development: A Step by Step Guide to World Class Concurrent Engineering
Certification by Data Reports and Stamping
Power Boilers: A Guide to the Section I of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Second Edition
Platform Technologies
Computer Aided Design and Manufacturing