Product development firms continually struggle to simultaneously keep product cost low while increasing product quality. This paper focuses on variation and its impact on the quality-failure costs—scrap, rework, extra labor, customer dissatisfaction, and product returns. In many cases, reducing quality failures requires an increase in product cost. Balancing these two costs is challenging because perfect information about process variability is rarely, if ever, available. As a result of process variation uncertainty, there is no clear optimal solution to the quality-failure cost/unit cost tradeoff. The author has observed that companies take one of two approaches to this dilemma: optimistic or pessimistic. The optimistic approach risks high rework costs to ensure the lowest cost product. On the other hand, the pessimistic approach forgoes potential unit cost reductions to avoid any quality failure. This paper presents a utility theory model of decision making under process capability uncertainty. This model is used to describe why either approach can be optimal depending on the organization, market, and product characteristics. In addition, information value theory is applied to explain the relative value of process capability information and variation reduction in the two approaches. The paper uses a frequently encountered design scenario to demonstrate the approach. In addition, a variety of other examples from industry are used to describe how the theory can be applied.

1.
Taguchi, G., 1993, Taguchi on Robust Technology Development: Bringing Quality Engineering Upstream, ASME Press, New York.
2.
Montgomery, D. C., 1996, Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, John Wiley & Sons.
3.
Clifford, H., 1997, “Six Sigma,” Continental, November, pp. 64–67.
4.
Doherty, J., 1997, “Mixed Signals: After a Search, AlliedSignal’s Chief Aims to Win the Street’s Favor Again,” Barrons, December 19, pp. 29–34.
5.
Parkinson
,
A.
,
1995
, “
Robust Mechanical Design Using Engineering Models
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
117B
, pp.
48
54
.
6.
Kazmer, D., Barkan, P., and Ishii, K., 1996, “Quantifying Design and Manufacturing Robustness Through Stochastic Optimization Techniques,” Design Automation Conference, ASME Design Technical Conferences, Irvine, CA.
7.
Thornton, A. C., 1997, “Using Key Characteristics to Balance Cost and Quality During Product Development,” Design Theory and Methodology Conference, ASME Design Technical Conferences, Sacramento, CA.
8.
Tata, M., and Thornton, A., 1999, “Process Capability Database Usage In Industry: Myth vs. Reality,” Design for Manufacturing Conference, ASME Design Technical Conferences, Las Vegas, NV.
9.
Phadke, M. S., 1989, Quality Engineering Using Robust Design, PTR Prentice-Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
10.
Yu, J.-C., and Ishii, K., 1994, “Robust Design by Matching the Design with Manufacturing Variation Patterns,” Design Theory and Methodology, ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 7–14.
11.
Beiter, K. A., and Ishii, K., 1996, “Incorporating Dimensional Requirements into Material Selection and Design of Injection Molded Parts,” Computers in Engineering Conference, 1996 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Irvine, CA.
12.
Soderberg, R., 1994, “Robust Design by Tolerance Allocation Considering Quality and Manufacturing Costs,” Design Theory and Methodology, ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Minneapolis, MN, New York, pp. 219–225.
13.
Marshall, K. T., and Oliver, R. M., 1995, Decision Making and Forecasting, McGraw Hill Inc., New York.
14.
Arrow, K. J., 1971, Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing, Markham Publishing Company, Chicago.
15.
Hazelrigg
,
G. A.
,
1998
, “
A Framework for Decision-Based Engineering Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
120
, pp.
653
658
.
16.
Thurston
,
D. L.
, and
Locascio
,
A.
,
1994
, “
Decision Theory for Design Economics
,”
Eng. Econom.
,
40
, No.
1
, pp.
41
72
.
17.
Kim
,
K.
,
Cormier
,
D. R.
,
O’Grady
,
P. J.
, and
Young
,
R. E.
,
1995
, “
A System for Design and Concurrent Engineering Under Imprecision
,”
J Intelligent Manufacturing
,
6
, No.
1
, pp.
11
27
.
18.
Finch, W. W., 1998, “An Overview of Inference Mechanisms for Quantified Relations,” Design Theory and Methodology, ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Atlanta, GA, pp. DETC98/DTM-5666.
19.
Otto, K. N., and Antonsson, E. K., 1995, “Propagating Imprecise Engineering Constraints,” Proceedings of the 1995 FUZZ/IEEE Conference, Yokohama, JP.
20.
Law, W. S., and Antonsson, E. K., 1994, “Including Imprecision in Engineering Design Calculations,” Design Theory and Methodology Conference, ASME Design Technical Conferences, Minneapolis, MN.
21.
Bradley
,
S. R.
, and
Agogino
,
A. M.
,
1994
, “
An Intelligent Real Time Design Methodology for Component Selection: An Approach to Managing Uncertainty
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
116
, pp.
980
988
.
22.
Liggett, J. Y., 1992, Dimensional Variation Management Handbook: A Guide for Quality, Design, and Manufacturing Engineers, Prentice Hall.
23.
Thornton
,
A. C.
,
1999
, “
Variation Risk Management Using Modeling and Simulation
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
121
, No.
2
, pp.
297
304
.
24.
Leland, C., 1997, “A Cultural Analysis of Key Characteristic Selection and Team Problem Solving During an Automobile Launch,” S.M., MIT, Boston.
25.
Lee, D., and Thornton, A., 1996, “The Identification and Use of Key Characteristics in the Product Development Process,” Design Theory and Methodology Conference, ASME Design Technical Conferences, Irvine, CA.
26.
Tang
,
K.
, and
Lo
,
J.-J.
,
1993
, “
Determination of the Optimal Process Mean when Inspection is Based on a Correlated Variable
,”
IIE Transactions
,
25
, No.
3
, pp.
66
72
.
27.
Lucca, A. M., Berti, K. N., and Cerveny, D. C., 1995, “Statistical Tolerance Allocation in Design Utilizing Historical Supplier Process Data,” Advances in Electronic Packaging, ASME pp. 229–235.
28.
Naish
,
J. C.
,
1996
, “
Process Capability Modeling in an Integrated Concurrent Engineering System—The Feature-Oriented Capability Module
,”
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
,
61
, pp.
124
129
.
29.
Ingle, T. H., 1998, “Leveraging the Learning Process in Manufacturing,” MSc, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
30.
DiCarlo, L., 1998, “Manufacturing is Key to Chip Success,” PC Week, May 11, 1998, 15 No. 19, pp. 33.
31.
Haber, C., 1998, “AMD’s Last Chance,” Electronic News, April 13, 1998 44, No. 2214, 1.
32.
Fine
,
C. H.
,
1986
, “
Quality Improvement and Learning in Productive Systems
,”
Manage. Sci.
,
32
, No.
10
. pp.
1301
1315
.
33.
Clark, K. B., and Fujimoto T. 1991 Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization, and Management in the World Auto Industry, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
34.
Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., and Roos, D., 1991, The Machine That Changed the World: The Story of Lean Production, Harperperennial Library, New York.
35.
Rothschild
,
M.
, and
Stiglitz
,
J. E.
,
1970
, “
Increasing Risk: I. A Definition
,”
J. Economic Theory
,
2
, pp.
225
243
.
36.
Shannon, C. E., and Weaver, W., 1949, “The Mathematical Theory of Communication,” The University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois.
37.
Kelly
,
J. L. J.
,
1956
, “
A New Interpretation of Information Rate
,”
Bell Syst. Tech. J.
,
35
, pp.
917
926
.
38.
Ertan, B., 1998, “Analysis of Key Characteristic Methods and Enablers Used in Variation Risk Management,” MSc, MIT, Cambridge.
39.
Banks, H., 1998, “Slow Learner,”Forbes, May 4, 1998, p. 54.
40.
Craig
,
M.
,
1996
, “
Dimensional Management, Not Tolerance Assignment
,”
Manuf. Eng.
,
117
, No.
6
, p.
8
8
.
41.
Jacobs, A., 1998, “Users Warming to sub-$1000 PCs,” Computerworld, August 3, p. 53.
42.
Weil, N., 1998, “Sub-$1000 PC Market Set to Boom,”IDG News Service May 13, 1998.
43.
Otto, K., 1994, “Robust Product Design Using Manufacturing Adjustments,” Design Theory and Methodology, ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 1–8.
You do not currently have access to this content.