The paper presents the theory of performance sensitivity distribution and a novel robust parameter design technique. In the theory, a Jacobian matrix describes the effect of the component tolerance to the system performance, and the performance distribution is characterized in the variation space by a set of eigenvalues and eigenvectors. Thus, the feasible performance space is depicted as an ellipsoid. The size, shape, and orientation of the ellipsoid describe the quantity as well as quality of the feasible space and, therefore, the performance sensitivity distribution against the tolerance variation. The robustness of a design is evaluated by comparing the fitness between the ellipsoid feasible space and the tolerance space, which is a block, through a set of quantitative and qualitative indexes. The robust design can then be determined. The design approach is demonstrated in a mechanism design problem. Because of the generality of the analysis theory, the method can be used in any design situation as long as the relationship between the performance and design variables can be expressed analytically.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
design engineering, performance evaluation, eigenvalues and eigenfunctions
Topics:
Design, Eigenvalues
1.
Hartenberg, R. S., and Denavit, J., 1964, Kinematic Synthesis of Linkages, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 316–319.
2.
Knappe, L. G., 1963, “Mechanism Tolerances,” Mach. Des., April, pp. 155–157.
3.
Kolhatkar
,
S. A.
, and
Yajnik
,
K. S.
,
1969
, “
The Effects of Play in the Joints of a Function-Generating Mechanism
,”
J. Mec.
,
5
, pp.
521
–
532
.
4.
Yin, Z. W., and Wu, J. K., 1990, “An Optimal Synthesis of Linkages Considering Structural Error and Clearances,” ASME, Mechanism Synthesis and Analysis, DE-Vol. 25, pp. 295–299.
5.
Lee
,
S. J.
, and
Gilmore
,
B. J.
,
1991
, “
The Determination of the Probabilistic Properties of Velocities and Accelerations in Kinematic Chains with Uncertainty
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
113
, pp.
84
–
90
.
6.
Sutherland
,
G. H.
, and
Roth
,
B.
,
1975
, “
Mechanism Design: Accounting for Manufacturing Tolerances and Costs in Function Generating
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
97
, No.
1
, pp.
283
–
286
.
7.
Shankar, C. V, Gary, L. K., and Waldron, K. J., 1992, “Optimal Synthesis of Four-Bar Linkages for Four-Position Rigid-Body Guidance with Selective Tolerance Specifications,” ASME DE-Vol. 46, pp. 651–659.
8.
Faik
,
S.
, and
Erdman
,
A. G.
,
1991
, “
Sensitivity Distribution in Synthesis Space of Four-bar Linkages
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
113
, pp.
3
–
9
.
9.
Lee, M., Erdman, A. G., and Faik, S., 1992, “A Generalized Performance Sensitivity Synthesis Methodology for Four-bar Mechanisms,” Mechanical Design and Synthesis, DE-Vol. 46, pp. 1–4.
10.
Parkinson
,
A.
,
1995
, “
Robust Mechanical Design Using Engineering Models
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
117
, pp.
48
–
54
.
11.
Zhu, J., 1999, “Robust Design, Optimal Tolerance Synthesis and Performance Analysis,” doctorate dissertation, Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, TN.
12.
Hogg, R. V., and Craig, A. T., 1970, Introduction to Mathematical Statistics, 4th Ed., Macmillan, New York.
13.
Sandor, G. N., and Erdman, A. G., 1984, Advanced Mechanism Design: Analysis and Synthesis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
14.
Anderson, T. W., 1984, An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 2nd Ed., Wiley, New York.
Copyright © 2001
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.