A three degree-of-freedom (DOF) planar parallel manipulator has been extensively studied as the fundamental example of parallel manipulators. In this work, we explicitly show that this mechanism possesses a completely decoupled compliance characteristic at the object space, which is the important operational requirement for a RCC device. As the first condition to have a RCC point, this mechanism should maintain symmetric configurations. As the second condition, the same magnitude of revolute joint compliance should be symmetrically placed at the same joint location of each chain. We also investigate the compliance characteristics of a spherical 3 DOF mechanism which has a similar kinematic structure to the planar mechanism through simulation. It turns out that the spherical mechanism also has a RCC point at the intersection point of all nine joint axes in its symmetric configuration. Further, more general output compliance model is derived for those mechanisms with redundant joint compliances. It is expected that these two parallel mechanisms not only can be used as excellent 3 DOF RCC devices, but also can be integrated into the design of a new six DOF RCC device. [S1050-0472(00)01101-6]

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
industrial manipulators, position control, compliance control, robot dynamics, machine control
Topics:
Kinematics, Parallel mechanisms, Simulation, Degrees of freedom, Manipulators
1.
De Fazio
,
T. L.
,
Seltzer
,
D. S.
, and
Whitney
,
D. E.
,
1984
, “
The Instrumented Remote Center Compliance
,”
The Industrial Robot
,
11
, No.
4
, pp.
238
–
242
.
2.
Brussel, H. V., Thielemans, H., and Simons, J., 1978, “Further Developments of the Active Adaptive Compliant Wrist (AACW) for Robot Assembly,” Proc. Int’l. Symp. on Industrial Robots, SME, 1, pp. 377–384.
3.
Cutkosky
,
M. R.
, and
Kao
,
Imin
,
1989
, “
Computing and Controlling the Compliance of a Robotic Hand
,”
IEEE Trans. on Rob. Auto.
,
5
, No.
2
, pp.
151
–
165
.
4.
Cutkosky
,
M. R.
, and
Wright
,
P. K.
,
1986
, “
Active Control of a Compliant Wrist in Manufacturing Tasks
,”
Transactions of the ASME Journal of Eng. for Ind.
,
108
, No.
1
, pp.
36
–
43
.
5.
Whitney
,
D. E.
,
1982
, “
Quasi-Static Assembly of Compliantly Supported Rigid Parts
,”
J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
,
104
, pp.
65
–
77
.
6.
Whitney, D. E., 1986, “Remote Center Compliance,” in Encyclopedia of Robotics System and Control, 2, edited by J. J. Diponio and Y. Hasegawa, published by Industrial Training Corporation, pp. 1316–1324.
7.
McCallion, H., Alexander, K. V., and Pham, D. T., 1980, “Aid for Automatic Assembly,” 1st Int’1. Conf. on Assembly Automation, 1, pp. 313–323.
8.
Peshkin
,
M. A.
,
1990
, “
Programmed Compliance for Error Corrective Assembly
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
,
6
, No.
4
, pp.
474
–
482
.
9.
Loncaric
,
J.
,
1987
, “
Normal Form of Stiffness and Compliance Matrices
,”
Trans. on IEEE J. Robotics and Automation
,
RA-3
(
6
), pp.
567
–
572
.
10.
Lipkin, H., and Patterson, T., 1992, “Generalized Center of Compliance and Stiffness,” Proceedings of IEEE Int’1 Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 2, pp. 1251–1256.
11.
Loncaric, J., 1985, Geometrical Analysis of Compliant Mechanics in Robotics, Ph.D. Thesis, Harvard University.
12.
Freeman, R. A., and Tesar, D., 1988, “Dynamic Modeling of Serial and Parallel Mechanism/Robotic Systems, Part I-Methodology, Part II-Applications,” Proceedings of 20th ASME Mechanisms Conference, Orlando FL, DE-Vol. 15-3, pp. 7–27.
13.
Yi
,
Byung-Ju
, and
Freeman
,
R. A.
,
1992
, “
Synthesis of Actively Adjustable Springs by Antagonistic Redundant Actuation
,”
J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
,
114
, pp.
454
–
461
.
Copyright © 2000
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.