Plates frequently find use as connecting elements in structures built from aluminum alloys. Many structural elements employ mechanical fasteners. Design of connections necessitates that due consideration be given to: (a) bolt or rivet failure, (b) progressive bearing distress of material adjacent to the fastener(s), (c) net-section tensile failure, and (d) tear out of the fastener group(s). Current design provisions for block shear failures of bolted and riveted joints in aluminum-based alloys make use of models initially developed for structural steels or, alternatively, fail to address an estimation of joint capacity. Shear failure of aluminum connecting elements is the focus of this paper. An experimental and analytical program was undertaken with the objective of studying block shear failure of aluminum connecting elements. Twenty aluminum alloy 6061-T6 gusset plates, representing four different bolt patterns, were mechanically deformed. Models to estimate the capacity of the joints are examined and compared with experimental results. Strain distribution around the periphery of the connections were measured and compared to finite element predictions. The correlations between the design models and experimental observations are highlighted.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Topics:
Aluminum alloys, Design, Failure, Aluminum, Fasteners, Shear (Mechanics), Plates (structures), Alloys, Bearings, Finite element analysis, Rivets, Structural elements (Construction), Structural steel
1.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, AAASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 1994, Section 7, Aluminum Structures, Washington, D.C.
2.
The Aluminum Design Manual, 1994, The Aluminum Association, Washington, D.C.
3.
Fisher, J. W., and Struik, J. H., 1974, A Guide to Design Criteria for Bolted and Riveted Joints, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
4.
Sharp, M. L., 1993, A Behavior and Design of Aluminum Structures, McGraw-Hill, New York.
5.
Birkemoe, P. C., and Gilmor, M. J., 1978, “Behavior of Bearing Critical Double-Angle Beam Connections,” AISC Engineering Journal, American Institute of Steel Construction, 4 Qtr.
6.
Marsh, C., 1979, “Tear-Out Failure of Bolt Groups,” American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE Structural Journal, No. ST10, October.
7.
Starke
E. A.
,
1977
,
Materials Science and Engineering
, Vol.
29
, pp.
99
–
115
.
8.
Starke, E. A. Jr., 1989, Aluminum Alloys: Contemporary Research and (edited by A. K. Vasudevan and R. D. Doherty), Treatise in Materials Science and Technology, Academic Press, Vol. 31, p. 35.
9.
Menzemer, C., and Fei, L., 1997, “Design Criteria for Bolted Connection Elements in Aluminum,” Final Technical Report, The Aluminum Association, Washington, D.C., February.
10.
ASTM E-8:93, 1993, “Method for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials,” American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia, PA.
11.
Chen, W. F., and Han, D. J., 1988, Plasticity for Structural Engineers, Springer-Verlag, New York.
12.
Hertzberg, R. W., 1983, Deformation and Fracture Mechanics of Engineering Materials, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
13.
Haradash, S., and Bjorhoude, R., 1985, “New Design Criteria for Gusset Plates in Tension,” AISC Engineering Journal, American Institute for Steel Construction, Vol. 2 d Qtr.
14.
Galambos, T. V., 1981, “Load and Resistance Factor Design,” AISC Engineering Journal, American Institute for Steel Construction, 3 Qtr.
15.
“Aluminum Standards and Data,” 1988, The Aluminum Association, Washington, D.C.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1999
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.