Compliant members in flexible link mechanisms undergo large deflections when subjected to external loads. Because of this fact, traditional methods of deflection analysis do not apply. Since the nonlinearities introduced by these large deflections make the system comprising such members difficult to solve, parametric deflection approximations are deemed helpful in the analysis and synthesis of compliant mechanisms. This is accomplished by representing the compliant mechanism as a pseudo-rigid-body model. A wealth of analysis and synthesis techniques available for rigid-body mechanisms thus become amenable to the design of compliant mechanisms. In this paper, a pseudo-rigid-body model is developed and solved for the tip deflection of flexible beams for combined end loads. A numerical integration technique using quadrature formulae has been employed to solve the large deflection Bernoulli-Euler beam equation for the tip deflection. Implementation of this scheme is simpler than the elliptic integral formulation and provides very accurate results. An example for the synthesis of a compliant mechanism using the proposed model is also presented.

1.
Bisshopp
K. E.
, and
Drucker
D. C.
,
1945
, “
Large Deflection of Cantilever Beams
,”
Quarterly of Applied Mathematics
, Vol.
3
, No.
3
, pp.
272
275
.
2.
Bisshopp
K. E.
,
1973
, “
Approximations for Large Deflection of a Cantilever Beam
,”
Quarterly of Applied Mathematics
, Vol.
30
, No.
4
, pp.
521
526
.
3.
Burns, R. H., 1964, “The Kinetostatic Synthesis of Flexible Link Mechanisms,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
4.
Carnahan, B., Luther, H. A., Wilkes, J. O., 1990, Applied Numerical Methods, Malabar Fla., R. E. Kriger Pub. Co.
5.
Holman, J. P., 1989, Experimental Methods for Engineers, Fifth Edition, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, New York.
6.
Howell, L., 1991, “The Design and Analysis of Large-Deflection Members in Compliant Mechanisms,” M.S. Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
7.
Howell
L.
, and
Midha
A.
,
1994
, “
A Method for the Design of Compliant Mechanisms With Small-Length Flexural Pivots
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN
, Vol.
116
, No.
1
, pp.
280
290
.
8.
Howell
L.
,
Midha
A.
, and
Norton
T. W.
,
1996
, “
Evaluation of Equivalent Spring Stiffness for Use in a Pseudo-Rigid-Body Model of Large-Deflection Compliant Mechanisms
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN
, Vol.
118
, No.
1
, pp.
126
131
.
9.
Howell
L.
, and
Midha
A.
,
1995
, “
Parametric Deflection Approximations for End-Loaded, Large-Deflection Beams in Compliant Mechanisms
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN
, Vol.
117
, No.
1
, pp.
156
165
.
10.
Mattiasson
K.
,
1981
, “
Numerical Results from Large Deflection Beam and Frame Problems Analyzed by Means of Elliptic Integrals
,”
International Journal of Numerical Methods in Engineering
, Vol.
17
, pp.
145
153
.
11.
Rao, S. S., 1984, Optimization: Theory and Applications, Wiley Eastern Limited, New Delhi.
12.
Sandor, G. N., and Erdman, A. G., 1984, Advanced Mechanism Design, Analysis and Synthesis, Vol. II, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
13.
Saxena, A., 1997, “A New Pseudo-Rigid-Body Model for Flexible Members in Compliant Mechanisms,” Masters Thesis, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, Jun.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.