One of the crucial issues for developing computer aided conceptual design system is representation of functions which represent designers’ intention. Representing functions is also crucial not only for representing design objects but also for describing conceptual design processes, in which designers operate mainly functional concepts. Namely, function is a key concept to integrate object modeling and process modeling in design. In this paper, first we extend the FBS (Function-Behavior-State) diagram, which we have already proposed, by introducing three additional concepts for representing a function; namely, function body that represents designers’ intention directly, function modifier that qualifies a function body, and objective entity on which the function body occurs. This extended FBS diagram, called FBS/m (modifier) diagram, enables us to represent designers’ intention more precisely than the original FBS diagram. Then, we propose an FEP (Functional Evolution Process) model to represent design processes. In the FEP model, the FBS model of a design object is evolved through three steps, i.e., functional actualization, functional evaluation and functional operation. Functional actualization depicts a process to obtain physical descriptions from functional description. Functional evaluation is a process to measure realizability of functions of the design object. Functional operation is a process to operate functions to improve the design. Based on the FEP model, we analyze an actual design process, and show that the FEP model is suitable for representing designers’ intention along with design processes.

1.
Dempster, A. P., 1969, Elements of Continuous Multivariate Analysis, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.
2.
Ishii, M., Tomiyama, T., and Yoshikawa, H., 1993, “A Synthetic Reasoning Method for Conceptual Design,” Towards World Class Manufacturing, M. J. Wozny and G. Olling, eds., IFIP Transactions B-17, pp. 3–16, Amsterdam, IFIP, North-Holland.
3.
Iwasaki, Y., Fikes, R., Vescovi, M., and Chandrasekaran, B., 1993, “How Things Are Intended to Work: Capturing Functional Knowledge in Device Design,” Proceedings of IJCAI-93, pp. 1516–1522.
4.
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., and Tannenbaum, P. H., 1957, The Measurement of Meaning, The University of Chicago Press.
5.
Pahl, G., and Beitz, W., 1984, Engineering Design, The Design Council, London.
6.
Ralston, A., and Reilly, E. D., edits., 1992, Encyclopedia of Computer Science, Van Nostrand Reinhold.
7.
Roth, K., 1982, Konstruieren mit Konstruktions Katalogen, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
8.
Shannon
C. E.
,
1948
, “
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
,”
Bell Syst. Tech. J.
, Vol.
27
, pp.
379
623
.
9.
Shimomura, Y., Takeda, H., Umeda, Y., and Tomiyama, T., 1994, “Representation of Design Objects Using Functional Modifier,” Proceedings of Design Symposium 1994, pp. 58–62. JSPE (Japan Society for Precision Eng.), (In Japanese).
10.
Takeda, H., Hamada, S., Tomiyama, T., and Yoshikawa, H., 1990, “A Cognitive Approach of the Analysis of Design Processes,” Proceedings of Design Theory and Methodology—DTM’90—, pp. 153–160, ASME.
11.
Takeda
H.
,
Veerkamp
P.
,
Tomiyama
T.
, and
Yoshikawa
H.
,
1990
, “
Modeling Design Processes
,”
AI Magazine
, Vol.
11
, No.
4
, pp.
37
48
.
12.
Takeda, H., Tomiyama, T., and Yoshikawa, H., 1992, “A Logical and Computable Framework for Reasoning in Design,” D. L. Taylor and L. A. Stauffer, eds., Proceedings of Design Theory and Methodology—DTM’92—, pp. 167–174. ASME.
13.
Tomiyama, T., Umeda, Y., and Yoshikawa, H., 1993, “A CAD for Functional Design,” Annals of the CIRP ’93, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 143–146. CIRP.
14.
Ulrich, K. T., and Seering, W. P., 1988, “Function Sharing in Mechanical Design,” Proceedings of AAAI-88, pp. 342–346.
15.
Umeda, Y., Takeda, H., Tomiyama, T., and Yoshikawa, H., 1990, “Function, Behaviour, and Structure,” AIENG’90 Applications of AI in Engineering, pp. 177–193, Computational Mechanics Publications and Springer-Verlag.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.