A methodology is presented for the design of optimal cooling systems for injection mold tooling which models the mold cooling as a nonlinear constrained optimization problem. The design constraints and objective function are evaluated using Finite Element Analysis (FEA). The objective function for the constrained optimization problem is stated as minimization of both a function related to part average temperature and temperature gradients throughout the polymeric part. The goal of this minimization problem is to achieve reduction of undesired defects as sink marks, differential shrinkage, thermal residual stress built-up, and part warpage primarily due to non-uniform temperature distribution in the part. The cooling channel size, locations, and coolant flow rate are chosen as the design variables. The constrained optimal design problem is solved using Powell’s conjugate direction method using penalty function. The cooling cycle time and temperature gradients are evaluated using transient heat conduction simulation. A matrix-free algorithm of the Galerkin Finite Element Method (FEM) with the Jacobi Conjugate Gradient (JCG) scheme is utilized to perform the cooling simulation. The optimal design methodology is illustrated using a case study.

Issue Section:
Design Automation
Topics:
Computer-aided engineering, Cooling systems, Design, Optimization, Cooling, Finite element analysis, Finite element methods, Simulation, Temperature gradient, Algorithms, Coolants, Cycles, Design methodology, Flow (Dynamics), Shrinkage (Materials), Stress, Temperature, Temperature distribution, Tooling, Transient heat transfer, Warping
1.
Chen
S. C.
, and
Chung
Y. C.
,
1994
, “
Numerical Simulations of the Cyclic, Transient Mold Heat Transfer in Injection Mold-Cooling Process
,”
International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer
, Vol.
21
, pp.
323
–
332
.
2.
Chiang
H. H.
,
Himasekhar
K.
,
Santhanam
N.
, and
Wang
K. K.
,
1993
, “
Integrated Simulation of Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer in Injection Molding for the Prediction of Shrinkage and Warpage
,”
Journal of Engineering Material and Technology
, Vol.
115
, pp.
37
–
47
.
3.
Himasekhar, K., Hieber, C. A., and Wang, K. K., 1989, “Computer-Aided Design Soft-Ware for Cooling System in Injection Molding,” SPE ANTEC, pp. 352–355.
4.
Himasekhar
K.
,
Lottey
J.
, and
Wang
K. K.
,
1992
, “
CAE of Mold Cooling in Injection Molding Using a Three-Dimensional Numerical Simulation
,”
ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry
, Vol.
114
, pp.
213
–
221
.
5.
Jeppson, R. W., 1976, Analysis of Flow in Pipe Networks, Butterworth Publishers, Boston.
6.
Pochiraju, K., Chassapis, C., and Manoochehri, S., 1995, “Integrated Design Optimization of Injection Molded Parts With Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastics,” R. W. Lewis and P. Durbetaki, eds., Numerical Methods in Thermal Problem, Vol. IX, Pineridge Press, Swansea, U.K., pp. 1349–1360.
7.
Reklaitis, G. V., Ravindran, A., and Ragsdell, K. M., 1983, Engineering Optimization—Methods and Applications, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
8.
Shewchuk, J. R., 1995, “A Two-Dimensional Quality Mesh Generator and Delaunay Triangulator,” Software Package, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University.
9.
Shim, P. Y., and Manoochehri, S., 1993, “A Hybrid Shape Optimization Method Based on Implicit Differentiation and Node Removal Techniques,” Adv. Design Autom., DE-Vol. 65-2, pp. 595–603.
10.
Shim, P. Y., and Manoochehri, S., 1994, “Configuration Design of Structures Using Discrete Optimization Approach,” Adv. Design Autom., DE-Vol. 69-2, pp. 6168.
11.
Tang
L. Q.
,
Pochiraju
K.
,
Chassapis
C.
, and
Manoochehri
S.
,
1996
, “
Three-dimensional Transient Mold Cooling Analysis Based on Galerkin Finite Element Formulation With a Matrix-Free Conjugate Gradient Technique
,”
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
, Vol.
39
, pp.
3049
–
3064
.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1998
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.