Many modern approaches to engineering design seek to optimize design in order to maximize the value of the system to its customers. These approaches rely on the formulation of a system utility function as a measure of system worth. It is shown here that, under certain circumstances, however, such a measure cannot exist. It is then indicated that these circumstances comprise the rule rather than the exception. Finally it is shown that pursuing the objective of design optimization as defined by the customers via contemporary approaches can lead the designer to highly inappropriate and undesirable designs. As a consequence of this, it becomes apparent that the methods of Total Quality Management (TQM) and Quality Function Deployment (QFD) can lead to highly erroneous results.

Arrow, K. J., 1963, Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd Ed., John Wiley and Sons, NY.
Bernoulli, D., 1738, “Specimen Theoriae Novae de Mensure Sortis,” Cementer Academia Scientiarum Imperalis Petropolitanae, Tomus V, pp. 175–192. Also, “Exposition of a New Theory of Risk Evaluation,” Econometrica, Jan. 1954, Vol. 22, pp. 23–36. Translated by Louise Sommers.
Hazelrigg, G. A., 1996, Systems Engineering: An Approach to Information-Based Design, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. in press.
von Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O., 1953, The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 3rd Ed., Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.