Compliant mechanisms gain some or all of their mobility from the flexibility of their members rather than from rigid-body joints only. More efficient and usable analysis and design techniques are needed before the advantages of compliant mechanisms can be fully utilized. In an earlier work, a pseudo-rigid-body model concept, corresponding to an end-loaded geometrically nonlinear, large-deflection beam, was developed to help fulfill this need. In this paper, the pseudo-rigid-body equivalent spring stiffness is investigated and new modeling equations are proposed. The result is a simplified method of modeling the force/deflection relationships of large-deflection members in compliant mechanisms. The resulting models are valuable in the visualization of the motion of large-deflection systems, as well as the quick and efficient evaluation and optimization of compliant mechanism designs.

1.
Bathe
K.-J.
, and
Bolourch
S.
,
1979
, “
Large Displacement Analysis of Three-Dimensional Beam Structures
,”
International Journal For Numerical Methods in Engineering
, Vol.
14
, pp.
961
986
.
2.
Bisshopp
K. E.
, and
Drucker
D. C.
,
1945
, “
Large Deflection of Cantilever Beams
,”
Quarterly of Applied Mathematics
, Vol.
3
, No.
3
, pp.
272
275
.
3.
Burns, R. H., 1964, “The Kinetostatic Synthesis of Flexible Link Mechanisms,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Yale University.
4.
Burns, R. H., and Crossley, F. R. E., 1968, “Kinetostatic Synthesis of Flexible Link Mechanisms,” ASME Paper No. 68-Mech-36.
5.
Frisch-Fay, R., 1962, Flexible Bars, Butterworth, Washington, D.C.
6.
Her, I., 1986, “Methodology for Compliant Mechanism Design,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Purdue University.
7.
Howell, L. L., 1993, “A Generalized Loop-Closure Theory for the Analysis and Synthesis of Compliant Mechanisms,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Purdue University.
8.
Howell
L. L.
, and
Midha
A.
,
1994
a, “
A Method for the Design of Compliant Mechanisms with Small-Length Flexural Pivots
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN
, Vol.
116
, No.
1
, pp.
280
290
.
9.
Howell, L. L., and Midha, A., 1994b, “The Development of Force-Deflection Relationships for Compliant Mechanisms,” Machine Elements and Machine Dynamics, G. R. Pennock, ed., DE-Vol. 71, 23rd ASME Mechanisms Conference, pp. 501–508.
10.
Howell
L. L.
,
Midha
A.
, and
Norton
T. W.
,
1994
, “
Evaluation of Equivalent Spring Stiffness for Use in a Pseudo-Rigid-Body Model of Large-Deflection Compliant Mechanisms
,”
Mechanism Synthesis and Analysis
, G. R. Pennock, ed., DE-Vol.
70
, 23rd ASME Mechanisms Conference, pp.
405
412
.
11.
Howell
L. L.
, and
Midha
A.
,
1995
, “
Parametric Deflection Approximations for End-Loaded, Large-Deflection Beams in Compliant Mechanisms
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN
, Vol.
117
, No.
1
, pp.
156
165
.
12.
Midha
A.
,
Norton
T. W.
, and
Howell
L. L.
,
1994
, “
On the Nomenclature, Classification, and Abstractions of Compliant Mechanisms
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN
, Vol.
116
, No.
1
, pp.
270
279
.
13.
Norton, T. W., 1991, “On the Nomenclature and Classification, and Mobility of Compliant Mechanisms,” M.S. Thesis, Purdue University.
14.
Salamon, B. A., 1989, “Mechanical Advantage Aspects in Compliant Mechanisms Design,” M.S. Thesis, Purdue University.
15.
Sevak, N. M., and McLarnan, C. W., 1974, “Optimal Synthesis of Flexible Link Mechanisms with Large Static Deflections,” ASME Paper No. 74-DET-83.
16.
Yang
T. Y.
,
1973
, “
Matrix Displacement Solution to Elastica Problems of Beams and Frames
,”
International Journal of Solids and Structures
, Vol.
9
, No.
7
, pp.
829
842
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.