Kinematic structural synthesis has been relatively successful when applied to the conceptual design of mechanisms. The approach presented in this paper, however, views the design process from an initial standpoint of a truss structure. First, graphs are generated that represent truss structures with a given number of nodes and links. Each graph is then modified by designating certain edges in the graph to represent links in the structure that incorporate additional degrees of freedom. In so doing, the graph of a structure is transformed into one representing a mechanism. A procedure is presented that enables the exhaustive generation of these graphs for deployable structures of any given number of nodes and links. From these graphs, it is then possible to obtain enumerable novel deployable truss structures as well as those that have been reported in the literature.

1.
Freudenstein, F., and Dobrjanskyj, L., 1965, “On a Theory of Type Synthesis of Mechanisms,” Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Applied Mechanisms, Springer, Berlin, pp. 420–428.
2.
Crossley, F. R. E., 1965, “The Permutations of Kinematic Chains of Eight Members or Less from the Graph—Theoretic Viewpoint,” Developments in Theoretical and Applied Mechanisms, Vol. 2, W. A. Shaw, ed., Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 467–486.
3.
Dobrjanskyj
L.
, and
Freudenstein
F.
,
1967
, “
Some Applications of Graph Theory to the Structural Analysis of Mechanisms
,”
ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry
,
89B
, pp.
153
158
.
4.
Buchsbaum
F.
, and
Freudenstein
F.
,
1970
, “
Synthesis of Kinematic Structure of Geared Kinematic Chains and Other Mechanisms
,”
Journal of Mechanisms
, Vol.
5
, pp.
357
392
.
5.
Freudenstein
F.
,
1971
, “
An Application of Boolean Algebra to the Motion of Epicyclic Drives
,”
ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry
,
93B
, pp.
176
182
.
6.
Freudenstein, F., and Woo, L. S., 1974, “Kinematic Structure of Mechanisms,” Basic Questions of Design Theory, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 241–264.
7.
Lee, T. W., and Freudenstein, F., 1976, “Heuristic Combinatorial Optimization in the Kinematic Design of Mechanisms, Part 1: Theory, Part 2: Applications,” ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry, November, pp. 1277–1284.
8.
Freudenstein, F., and Maki, E. R., 1979, “The Creation of Mechanisms According to Kinematic Structure and Function,” Journal of Environment and Planning, B, pp. 375–391.
9.
Sohn
W. J.
, and
Freudenstein
F.
,
1986
, “
An Application of Dual Graphs to the Automatic Generation of the Kinematic Structures of Mechanisms
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF MECHANISMS, TRANSMISSIONS, AND AUTOMATION IN DESIGN
, September, Vol.
108
, pp.
392
398
.
10.
Roberts, F. S., 1978, “Graph Theory and its Applications to Society,” Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
11.
Unger
S. H.
,
1964
, “
GIT—A Heuristic Program for Testing Pairs of Directed Line Graphs for Isomorphism
,”
Communications of the ACM
, Vol.
7
, No.
1
, pp.
26
34
.
12.
Warnaar, D. B., and Chew, M., 1990, “A Procedure for the Detection of Isomorphism in Graphs Using Vertex Degree Correspondence,” submitted for presentation at the 1990 Mechanisms Conference as well as for publication in the Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in Design.
13.
Hedgepeth, J. M., and Mikulas, M. M., 1979, “Expandable Modules for Large Space Structures,” AIAA/NASA Conference on Advanced Technology for Future Space Systems, Hampton, Virginia, May, pp. 375–379.
14.
Vaughan, D. H., 1981, “Modular Reflector Concept Study,” NASA Contractor Report 3411, March.
15.
Schwartzberg, F. R., Coyner, J. V., and Tobey, W. H., 1981, “Development and Application of Space Deployable Box Truss Structures,” 32nd Congress of the International Astronautical Federation, University of Rome, Rome, Italy, September, paper IAF-81-381.
16.
Craighead, N. D., et al., 1982, “Design Development and Mechanization of a Precision Deployable Truss with Optimized Structural Efficiency for Spaceborne Applications,” internal report Lockheed Missiles and Space Company, Inc.
17.
Rhodes, M. D., and Mikulas, M. M., 1985, “Deployable Controllable Geometry Truss Beam,” NASA Technical Memorandum 86366, June.
18.
Miura, K., 1985, “Variable Geometry Truss and its Application to Deployable Truss and Space Crane Arm,” 2nd Congress of the International Astronautical Federation, paper IAF-85-211.
19.
Takamatsu, K., Onoda, J., and Higuchi, K., 1987, “New Concepts of Deployable Truss Units for Large Space Structures,” 28th Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Monterey, California, April, pp. 695–704.
20.
Adams, L. R., 1987, “Design, Development and Fabrication of a Deployable/Retractable Truss Beam Model for Large Space Structures Application,” NASA Contractor Report 178287, June.
21.
Stoll, H. W., 1981, “Systematic Design of Deployable Space Structures,” 2nd AIAA Conference on Large Space Platforms, San Diego, California, February, AIAA Paper No. 81-0444.
22.
Chew, M., and Kumar, P., 1993, “Conceptual Design of Deployable Space Structures from the Viewpoint of Symmetry,” International Journal of Space Structures, Vol. 8, No. 1/2.
23.
Warnaar, D. B., and Chew, M., 1990, “Conceptual Design of De-ployable-Foldable Truss Structures Using Graph Theory, Part 1: Graph Generation, Part 2; Generation of Deployable Truss Module Design Concepts,” presented at the 1990 Mechanisms Conference.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.