Compliant mechanisms, unlike rigid-body mechanisms, gain some or all of their mobility from the flexibility of their members. Complaint mechanisms are desirable since they require fewer parts, and have less wear, noise, and backlash than their rigid-body counterpart mechanisms. The field of compliant mechanisms is expected to continue to grow as materials with superior properties are developed. Inasmuch as evolution of efficient design techniques is viewed as an essential research activity, a parallel, systematic development of appropriate vocabulary (nomenclature, classification, etc.) is of primary importance. This paper proposes a standard nomenclature for the components of compliant mechanisms and discusses the relevant issues involved in this process. Definitions for components, such as “links” and “joints,” remove ambiguity that has been associated with these terms in the past. Names and diagrams are discussed, and are shown to be similar because they represent “abstractions” of the same mechanisms. The concept of “levels of abstraction” is introduced, and common levels of abstraction are identified. A concerted effort is made to be consistent with current literature on both rigid-body mechanisms and compliant mechanisms whenever possible.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 1994
Research Papers
On the Nomenclature, Classification, and Abstractions of Compliant Mechanisms
A. Midha,
A. Midha
Elastic Mechanisms Laboratory, School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Search for other works by this author on:
T. W. Norton,
T. W. Norton
Elastic Mechanisms Laboratory, School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Search for other works by this author on:
L. L. Howell
L. L. Howell
Elastic Mechanisms Laboratory, School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Search for other works by this author on:
A. Midha
Elastic Mechanisms Laboratory, School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
T. W. Norton
Elastic Mechanisms Laboratory, School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
L. L. Howell
Elastic Mechanisms Laboratory, School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
J. Mech. Des. Mar 1994, 116(1): 270-279 (10 pages)
Published Online: March 1, 1994
Article history
Received:
May 1, 1992
Online:
June 2, 2008
Citation
Midha, A., Norton, T. W., and Howell, L. L. (March 1, 1994). "On the Nomenclature, Classification, and Abstractions of Compliant Mechanisms." ASME. J. Mech. Des. March 1994; 116(1): 270–279. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2919358
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Related Articles
A Method for the Design of Compliant Mechanisms With Small-Length Flexural Pivots
J. Mech. Des (March,1994)
Using Rigid-Body Mechanism Topologies to Design Path Generating Compliant Mechanisms
J. Mechanisms Robotics (February,2016)
Using Rigid-Body Mechanism Topologies to Design Shape-Changing Compliant Mechanisms
J. Mechanisms Robotics (February,2016)
A Model for Multi-Input Mechanical Advantage in Origami-Based Mechanisms
J. Mechanisms Robotics (December,2018)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Features That Should Make Selections Unacceptable
Heat Exchanger Engineering Techniques
Dimensional and Geometrical Tolerancing in Robust Design Environment
International Conference on Instrumentation, Measurement, Circuits and Systems (ICIMCS 2011)
Design of Space Net Capture System and Simulation
International Conference on Mechanical and Electrical Technology, 3rd, (ICMET-China 2011), Volumes 1–3