The prediction of the structural performance of additive manufacturing (AM) parts has become one of the main challenges to boost the use of AM in industry. The structural properties of AM are very important in order to design and fabricate parts not only of any geometrical shape but also with variable or customized mechanical properties. While AM experimental studies are common in the literature, a limited number of investigations have focused on the analysis and prediction of the mechanical properties of AM parts using theoretical and numerical approaches, such as the finite element method (FEM); however, their results have been not accurate yet. Thus, more research work is needed in order to develop reliable prediction models able to estimate the mechanical performance of AM parts before fabrication. In this paper, the analysis and numerical simulation of the structural performance of fused deposition modeling (FDM) samples with variable infill values is presented. The aim is to predict the mechanical performance of FDM components using numerical models. Thus, several standard tensile test specimens were fabricated in an FDM system using different infill values, a constant layer thickness, one shell perimeter, and polylactic acid (PLA) material. These samples were measured and modeled in a computer-aided design (CAD) system before performing the experimental tensile tests. Numerical models and simulations based on the FEM method were then developed and carried out in order to predict the structural performance of the specimens. Finally, the experimental and numerical results were compared and conclusions drawn.

References

References
1.
Durgun
,
I.
, and
Ertan
,
R.
,
2014
, “
Experimental Investigation of FDM Process for Improvement of Mechanical Properties and Production Cost
,”
Rapid Prototyping J.
,
20
(
3
), pp.
228
235
.
2.
Rodríguez
,
J. F.
,
Thomas
,
J. P.
, and
Renaud
,
J. E.
,
2001
, “
Mechanical Behavior of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) Fused Deposition Materials. Experimental Investigation
,”
Rapid Prototyping J.
,
7
(
3
), pp.
148
158
.
3.
Torres
,
J.
,
Cole
,
M.
,
Owji
,
A.
,
DeMastry
,
Z.
, and
Gordon
,
A. P.
,
2016
, “
An Approach for Mechanical Property Optimization of Fused Deposition Modeling With Polylactic Acid Via Design of Experiments
,”
Rapid Prototyping J.
,
22
(
2
), pp.
387
404
.
4.
Upcraft
,
S.
, and
Fletcher
,
R.
,
2003
, “
The Rapid Prototyping Technologies
,”
Assem. Autom.
,
23
(
4
), pp.
318
330
.
5.
Górski
,
F.
,
Kuczko
,
W.
,
Wichniarek
,
R.
, and
Hamrol
,
A.
,
2015
, “
Computation of Mechanical Properties of Parts Manufactured by Fused Deposition Modeling Using Finite Element Method
,” Ten
th International Conference on Soft Computing Models in Industrial and Environmental Applications
, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol.
368
,
A.
Herrero
,
J.
Sedano
,
B.
Baruque
,
H.
Quiantián
, and
E.
Corchado
, eds., Springer, Cham, Switzerland.
6.
Rayegani
,
F.
, and
Onwubolu
,
G. C.
,
2014
, “
Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) Process Parameter Prediction and Optimization Using Group Method for Data Handling (GMDH) and Differential Evolution (DE)
,”
Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.
,
73
(
1–4
), pp.
509
519
.
7.
Ching Ang
,
K.
,
Fai Leong
,
K.
, and
Kai Chua
,
C.
,
2006
, “
Investigation of the Mechanical Properties and Porosity Relationships in Fused Deposition Modelling-Fabricated Porous Structures
,”
Rapid Prototyping J.
,
12
(
2
), pp.
100
105
.
8.
Lazontti
,
A.
,
Grasso
,
M.
,
Staiano
,
G.
, and
Martorelli
,
M.
,
2015
, “
The Impact of Process Parameters on Mechanical Properties of Parts Fabricated in PLA With an Open-Source 3-D Printer
,”
Rapid Prototyping J.
,
21
(
5
), pp.
604
617
.
9.
Carneiro
,
O. S.
,
Silva
,
A. F.
, and
Gomes
,
R.
,
2015
, “
Fused Deposition Modeling With Polypropylene
,”
Mater. Des.
,
83
, pp.
768
776
.
10.
Rezayat
,
H.
,
Zhou
,
W.
,
Siriruk
,
A.
,
Penumadu
,
D.
, and
Babu
,
S. S.
,
2015
, “
Structure-Mechanical Property Relationship in Fused Deposition Modelling
,”
Mater. Sci. Technol.
,
31
(
8
), pp.
895
903
.
11.
ASTM
,
2014
, “
Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics
,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, Standard No. ASTM D638.
12.
3D Matter
,
2015
, “
What Is the Influence of Infill %, Layer Height and Infill Pattern on my 3D Prints?
,”
3D Matter
, West Conshohocken, PA, accessed July 20, 2018 http://my3dmatter.com/influence-infill-layer-height-pattern/
You do not currently have access to this content.