In previous studies, the single- and double-clip gauge methods were successfully consolidated in a single-edge notched tension (SE(T)) single specimen so that crack tip opening displacement (CTOD) values obtained from both SE(T) methods could be compared under identical test conditions. The current study investigated the effect of unloading compliance crack size equations on resistance curves obtained from both gauging methods combined in a single specimen. It was found that the unloading compliance crack size equations of Cravero and Ruggieri and the single clip gauge method predict crack sizes well within approximately 2% error in average. Two CTOD-resistance curves obtained from both gauging methods produce approximately the same results until peak loads, and thereafter the curves deviate. The results obtained from the double clip gauge method are consistently higher than those from the single clip gauge, although the difference between two resistance curves is reduced when the same unloading compliance crack size prediction procedure is used. This observation is very important within the framework of engineering critical assessment (ECA) and defect assessment procedures. An “apparent” higher resistance curve will generate larger tolerable defects thereby reducing the conservatism of an ECA analysis.

References

References
1.
Tang
,
H.
,
Macia
,
M.
,
Minnaar
,
K.
,
Gioielli
,
P.
,
Kibey
,
S.
, and
Fairchild
,
D.
,
2010
, “
Development of the SENT Test of Strain-Based Design of Welded Pipelines
,”
Proceedings of the 8th International Pipeline Conference
, IPC 2010, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
2.
DNV Recommended Practice, DNV-RP-F108,
2006
,
Fracture Control for Pipeline Installation Methods Introducing Cyclic Plastic Strain'
, Det Norske Veritas, Høvik, Norway.
3.
Shen
,
G.
,
Bouchard
,
R.
,
Gianetto
,
J. A.
, and
Tyson
,
W. R.
,
2008
, “
Fracture Toughness Evaluation of High Strength Steel Pipe
,”
Proceedings of PVP 2008
, Chicago, IL.
4.
ASTM E1820-11,
2011
,
Standard Test Method for Measurement for Fracture Toughness
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
.
5.
Shen
,
G.
,
Gianetto
,
J. A.
, and
Tyson
,
W. R.
,
2008
, “
Development of Procedure for Low-Constraint Toughness Testing Using a Single-Specimen Technique
,” CANMET Materials Technology Laboratory, Technical Report No. 2008-18.
6.
DNV-RP-F101,
2000
,
DNV Offshore Standard 'Submarine Pipeline Systems'
, Det Norske Veritas, Høvik, Norway.
7.
Fonzo
,
A.
,
Melis
,
G.
,
Di Vito
,
L.
,
Mannucci
,
G.
,
Darcis
,
P.
,
Richard
,
G.
,
Quintanilla
,
H.
, and
Armengol
,
M.
,
2009
, “
Techniques for Fracture Toughness Testing of Offshore Pipelines
,”
Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering—OMAE
, Honolulu, Hawaii, pp.
249
257
.
8.
Weeks
,
T. S.
,
McColskey
,
J. D.
,
Read
,
D. T.
, and
Richards
,
M. D.
,
2013
, “
Fracture Toughness Instrumentation Techniques for Single-Specimen Clamped SE(T) Tests on X100 Linepipe Steel: Experimental Setup
,”
6th Pipeline Technology Conference
, Ostend, Belgium.
9.
Park
,
D. Y.
,
Gravel
,
J. P.
,
Simha
,
C. H. M.
,
Liang
,
J.
, and
Duan
,
D. M.
,
2014
, “
Low-Constraint Toughness Testing of Two SE(T) Methods in a Single Specimen
,”
ASME Pressure Vessels & Piping Conference
, No. PVP2014-28415, Anaheim, CA.
10.
Park
,
D. Y.
,
Gravel
,
J. P.
,
Simha
,
C. H. M.
,
Liang
,
J.
, and
Duan
,
D. M.
,
2014
, “
Fracture Toughness of X70 Pipe Girth Welds Using Clamped SE(T) and SE(B) Single-Specimens
,”
ASME 10th International Pipeline Conference
, IPC2014-33233, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
11.
Quintana
,
M. A.
, and
Gianetto
,
J. A.
,
2011
, “
Background of All-Weld Metal Tensile Test Protocol
,” PHMSA, Technical Final Report No. 277-T-02.
12.
Wei
,
S.
,
Lu
,
S.
,
Li
,
D.
, and
Li
,
Y.
,
2010
, “
Impact Property Analysis of Weld Metal and Heat-Affected Zone for Low-Alloy Carbon Steel Multi-Pass Welded Joint
,”
China Weld.
,
19
(
1
), pp.
21
25
.
13.
Park
,
D. Y.
,
Tyson
,
W. R.
,
Gianetto
,
J. A.
,
Shen
,
G.
, and
Eagleson
,
R. S.
,
2012
, “
Fracture Toughness of X100 Pipe Girth Weld Using SE(T) and SE(B) Tests
,”
Proceedings of the 9th International Pipeline Conference
, IPC 2012, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
14.
Pussegoda
,
N.
,
Tiku
,
S.
, and
Tyson
,
W. R.
,
2014
, “
Test Protocol: Measurement of Crack-Tip Opening Displacement (CTOD) and J-Fracture Resistance Curves Using Single-Edge Notched Tension (SENT) Specimens
,” BMT Fleet Technology, Technical Report Document No. 30166-001 (Rev. 01).
15.
Cravero
,
S.
, and
Ruggieri
,
C.
,
2007
, “
Estimation Procedure of J-Resistance Curves for SE(T) Fracture Specimens Using Unloading Compliance
,”
Eng. Fract. Mech.
,
74
(
1
), pp.
2735
2757
.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.01.012
16.
Tyson
,
W. R.
,
Ding
,
P.
, and
Wang
,
X.
,
2014
, “
Elastic Compliance of Single-Edge-Notched Tension SE(T) (or SENT) Specimens
,” First Multi-Lateral Workshop on Fracture and Structural Integrity Related Issues, Catania, Italy, Sept. 15–17, pp. 95–100.
You do not currently have access to this content.