Experimental and numerical analyses of the mechanical behavior of bonded joints can be made particularly difficult by the influence of edge effects. Therefore, understanding the stress distribution in an adhesive joint can lead to improvements in adhesively-bonded assemblies. Such an analysis is proposed in the case of usual single lap shear specimens. Stress singularities can contribute to the initiation and propagation of cracks in the adhesive. Thus, in order to obtain reliable experimental data to analyze the nonlinear behavior of an adhesive in an assembly, tests which strongly limit the influence of stress singularities must be proposed. The design and the abilities of such a device for shear tests are presented. Moreover, some experimental results obtained using a modified Arcan fixture, which has been designed to strongly limit edge effects, are presented in the case of monotonic and complex history loadings. Furthermore, a 2D non associated elasto-visco-plastic model is proposed to accurately describe the experimental behavior under tensile-shear monotonic loadings. An extension of this model is also proposed to represent relaxation type effects under shear loadings.

References

References
1.
Adams
,
R. D.
, 2005,
Adhesive Bonding: Science, Technology and Applications,
Woodhead Publishing Limited
,
Cambridge, England
.
2.
Da Silva
,
L. F. M.
, and
Öchsner
,
A.
, 2008,
Modeling of Adhesive Bonded Joints
,
Springer
,
Berlin
.
3.
Leguillon
,
D.
, and
Sanchez-Palancia
,
E.
, 1987,
Computation of Singular Solutions in Elliptic Problems and Elasticity
,
Editions Masson
,
Paris
.
4.
Pandley
,
P. C.
, and
Narasimhan
,
S.
, 2001, “
Three-Dimensional Nonlinear Analysis of Adhesively Bonded Lap Joints Considering Viscoplasticity in Adhesives
,”
Comput. Struct.
,
79
, pp.
769
783
.
5.
Cheikh
,
M.
,
Coorevits
,
P.
, and
Loredo
,
M.
, 2001, “
Modelling the Stress Vector Continuity at the Interface of Bonded Joints
,”
Int. J. Adhes. Adhes.
,
22
, pp.
249
257
.
6.
Wang
,
P.
, and
Xu
,
L. R.
, 2006, “
Convex Interfacial Joints With Least Stress Singularities in Dissimilar Material
,”
Mech. Mater.
,
38
, pp.
1001
1011
.
7.
Belingardi
,
G.
,
Goglio
,
L.
, and
Tarditi
,
A.
, 2002, “
Investigating the Effect of Spew and Chamfer Size on the Stresses in Metal/Plastics Adhesive Joints
,”
Int. J. Adhes. Adhes.
,
22
, pp.
273
282
.
8.
Yan
,
Z. M.
,
You
,
M.
,
Yi
,
X. S.
,
Zheng
,
X. L.
and
Li
,
Z.
, 2007, “
A Numerical Study of Parallel Slot in Adherend on the Stress Distribution in Adhesively Bonded Aluminium Single Lap Joint
,”
Int. J. Adhes. Adhes.
,
27
,
687
695
.
9.
Chiu
,
W. K.
,
Chalkley
,
P. D.
, and
Jones
,
R.
, 1994, “
Effects of Temperature on the Shear Stress-Strain Behavior of Structural Adhesive
,”
Comput. Struct.
,
53
, pp.
483
89
.
10.
Deb
,
A.
,
Malvade
,
I.
,
Biswas
,
P.
, and
Schroeder
,
J.
, 2008, “
An Experimental and Analytical Study of the Mechanical Behaviour of Adhesively Bonded Joints for Variable Extension Rates and Temperature
,”
Int. J. Adhes. Adhes.
,
28
, pp.
1
15
.
11.
Dolev
,
G.
, and
Ishai
,
Q.
, 1981, “
Mechanical Characterization of Adhesive Layer in-situ and as Bulk Material
,”
J. Adhes.
,
12
, pp.
283
294
.
12.
Gali
,
S.
,
Dolev
,
G.
, and
Ishai
,
O.
, 1981, “
An Effective Stress/Strain Concept in the Mechanical Characterisation of Structural Adhesive Bonding
,”
Int. J. Adhes. Adhes.
, pp.
135
140
.
13.
Lei
,
X.
, and
Lissenden
,
C. J.
, 2007, “
Pressure Sensitive Nonassociative Plasticity Model for DRA Composites
,”
J. Eng. Mater. Technol.
,
129
, pp.
255
264
.
14.
Rolfres
,
R.
,
Volger
,
M.
,
Ernst
,
G.
and
Hühne
,
C.
, 2008, “
Strength of Textile Composites in Multiscale Simulation
,”
Trends in Computational Structures Technology
,
B. H. V.
Topping
and
M.
Papadrakakis
, eds.,
Saxe-Coburg Publications
,
Stirlingshire, UK
, Chap. 7, pp
151
171
.
15.
Cognard
,
J. Y.
,
Davies
,
P.
,
Sohier
,
L.
, and
Créac’hcadec
,
R.
, 2006, “
A Study of the Non-Linear Behavior of Adhesively-Bonded Composite Assemblies
,”
Compos. Struct.
,
76
, pp.
34
46
.
16.
Huntsman™ Structural Adhesives – Araldite® 420 A/B, Publication N° 161, UK, 2004.
17.
Cognard
,
J. Y.
,
Thomas
,
F.
, and
Verpeaux
,
P.
, 2000, “
An Integrated Approach to Solving Mechanical Problems on Parallel Computers
,”
Adv. Eng. Software
,
31
, pp.
885
899
.
18.
Goncalves
,
J. P. M.
,
De Moura
,
M. F. S. F.
, and
De Castro
,
P. M. S. T.
, 2002, “
A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Model for Stress Analysis of Adhesive Joints
,”
Int. J. Adhes. Adhes.
,
22
, pp.
357
365
.
19.
Cognard
,
J. Y.
, 2008, “
Numerical Analysis of Edge Effects in Adhesively-Bonded Assemblies: Application to the Determination of the Adhesive Behaviour
,”
Comput. Struct.
,
86
, pp.
1704
1717
.
20.
ASTM D5656–95, 1995, “
Standard Test Method for Thick-Adherend Metal Lap-Shear Joints for Determination of the Stress-Strain Behavior of Adhesives in Shear by Tension Loading
”.
21.
Zgoul
,
M.
, and
Crocombe
,
A. D.
, 2004, “
Numerical Modeling of Lap Joints Bonded With Rate-Dependent Adhesive
,”
Int. J. Adhes. Adhes.
,
24
, pp.
355
366
.
22.
Cognard
,
J. Y.
,
Créac’hcadec
,
R.
,
Sohier
,
L.
, and
Davies
,
P.
, 2008, “
Analysis of the Non-linear Behavior of Adhesives in Bonded Assemblies: Comparison of TAST and ARCAN Tests
,”
Int. J. Adhes. Adhes.
,
28
, pp.
393
404
.
23.
Cognard
,
J. Y.
,
Davies
,
P.
,
Gineste
,
B.
, and
Sohier
,
L.
, 2005, “
Development of an Improved Adhesive Test Method for Composite Assembly Design
,”
Compos. Sci. Technol.
,
65
, pp.
359
368
.
24.
Arcan
,
L.
,
Arcan
,
M.
, and
Daniel
,
L.
, 1987, “
SEM Fractography of Pure and Mixed Mode Interlaminar Fracture in Graphite/Epoxy Composites
,”
ASTM Spec. Tech Publ.
,
948
, pp.
41
67
.
25.
Keller
,
T.
, and
Vallée
,
T.
, 2005, “
Adhesively Bonded Lap Joints From Pultruded GFRP Profiles: Part II: Joint Strength Prediction
,”
Composites, Part B
,
36
, pp.
341
350
.
26.
Créac’hcadec
,
R.
,
Cognard
,
J. Y.
, and
Heuzé
,
Th.
, 2008, “
On Modelling the Behaviour of Thin Adhesive Films in Bonded Assemblies With Interface Elements
,”
J. Adhes. Sci. Technol.
,
22
, pp.
1541
1563
.
27.
Corigliano
,
A.
, and
Ricci
,
M.
, 2001, “
Rate-Dependent Interface Models: Formulation and Numerical Applications
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
,
38
, pp.
547
576
.
28.
Lemaitre
,
J.
, and
Chaboche
,
J. L.
, 1994,
Mechanics of Solid Materials
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
.
29.
Nouaihlas
,
D.
, 1989, “
Unified Modelling of Cyclic Viscoplasticity: Application to Austenitic Stainless Steels
,”
Int. J. Plast.
,
5
, pp.
501
520
.
30.
Raghava
,
R. S.
,
Cadell
,
R.
, and
Yeh
,
G. S. Y.
, 1973, “
The Macroscopic Yield Behaviour of Polymers
,”
J. Mater. Sci.
,
8
, pp.
225
232
.
31.
Mahnken
,
R.
, and
Schlimmer
,
M.
, 2005, “
Simulation of Strength Difference in Elasto-Plasticity for Adhesive Materials
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
,
63
, pp.
1461
1477
.
32.
Cognard
,
J. Y.
,
Créac’hcadec
,
R.
,
Maurice
,
J.
,
Davies
,
P.
,
Peleau
,
M.
, and
da Silva
,
L. F. M.
, 2010, “
Analysis of the Influence of Hydrostatic Stress on the Behaviour of an Adhesive in an Assembly
,”
J. Adhes. Sci. Technol.
,
24
, pp.
1977
1994
.
33.
Rémond
,
Y.
, 2005, “
Constitutive Modelling of Viscoelastic Unloading of Short Glass Fibre-Reinforced Polyethylene
,”
Compos. Sci. Technol.
,
65
, pp.
421
428
.
You do not currently have access to this content.