A micromechanical methodology has been developed for analyzing fiber bridging and resistance-curve behavior in reinforced-carbon-carbon (RCC) panels with a 3D composite architecture and a SiC surface coating. The methodology involves treating fiber bridging traction on the crack surfaces in terms of a weight function approach and a bridging law that relates the bridging stress to the crack opening displacement. A procedure has been developed to deduce material constants in the bridging law from the linear portion of the K-resistance curve. This approach has been applied to analyzing R-curves of RCC generated using double cantilever beam and single cantilever bend specimens to establish a bridging law for RCC. The bridging law has been implemented into a micromechanical code for computing the fracture response of a bridged crack in a structural analysis. The crack geometries considered in the structural analysis include the penetration of a craze crack in SiC into the RCC as a single-edge crack under bending and the deflection of a craze crack in SiC along the SiC/RCC interface as a T-shaped crack under bending. The proposed methodology has been validated by comparing the computed R-curves against experimental measurements. The analyses revealed substantial variations in the bridging stress (σo ranges from 11 kPa to 986 kPa, where σo is the limiting bridging stress) and the R-curve response for RCC due to the varying number of bridging ligaments in individual specimens. Furthermore, the R-curve response is predicted to depend on crack geometry. Thus, the initiation toughness at the onset of crack growth is recommended as a conservative estimate of the fracture resistance in RCC. If this bounding structural integrity analysis gives unacceptably conservative predictions, it would be possible to employ the current fiber bridging model to take credit for extra fracture resistance in the RCC. However, due to the large scatter of the inferred bridging stress in RCC, such an implementation would need to be probabilistically based.

1.
Opila
,
B.
, 2007, “
RCC SiC Anomaly
,” presented at the
NESC Materials TDT Face-to-Face Meeting
, Palo Alto, CA, Nov. 7.
2.
Vaughn
,
W. L.
,
Winfree
,
W. P.
,
Deemer
,
C.
, and
Hurwitz
,
F. I.
, 2005, “
Evaluation of RCC Carbon-Carbon in Simulation Flight Environments
,”
29th Annual Conference on Composites, Materials and Structures
, Cocoa Beach/Cape Canaveral, FL, Jan. 24–28.
3.
Piascik
,
R.
, 2007, “
SiC Coating Integrity Testing and Correlation With IR Thermography Line Scan Data
,”
NESC, NASA
Report.
4.
Reeder
,
J.
, 2004, “
Delamination Fracture Toughness Measurement
,”
NASA Langley Research Center
Report.
5.
O’Brien
,
T. K.
, 2008, “
RCC/SiC Interface Fracture Toughness Characterization Study
,”
NASA Langley
Report.
6.
Sullivan
,
B. J.
, 2008, “
3-D Orthotropic Properties for C-C Substrate and Pack-SiC Coating of Space Shuttle Reinforced C-C (RCC)
,” Materials Research & Designs, Inc. Report.
7.
Raju
,
I. S.
, and
Philips
,
D. R.
, 2008, “
Fracture Mechanics Analysis-Life-Off and Ascent
,”
NESC-LaRC
Report.
8.
“ASTM Standard Test Method D5528-94, Standard Test Method for Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites,” 1999,
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
,
ASTM
,
West Conshohocken, PA
, Vol.
15.03
, pp.
283
292
.
9.
Cantwell
,
W. J.
, and
Davies
,
P.
, 1996, “
A Study of Skin-Core Adhesion in Glass Fibre Reinforced Sandwich Materials
,”
Appl. Compos. Mater.
0929-189X,
3
, pp.
407
420
.
10.
Xie
,
D.
,
Salvi
,
A. G.
,
Sun
,
C.
, and
Waas
,
A. M.
, 2006, “
Discrete Cohesive Zone Model to Simulate Static Fracture in 2D Triaxially Braided Carbon Fiber Composites
,”
J. Compos. Mater.
0021-9983,
40
(
22
), pp.
2025
2046
.
11.
Chan
,
K. S.
, and
Davidson
,
D. L.
, 1991, “
Fatigue Crack Growth in Fiber-Reinforced Metal-Matrix Composites
,”
Fatigue of Advanced Materials
,
R. O.
Ritchie
,
R. H.
Dauskardt
, and
B. N.
Cox
, eds.,
Materials and Component Engineering
,
Birmingham, UK
, pp.
325
342
.
12.
Foote
,
R.
,
Mai
,
Y. -W.
, and
Cotterell
,
B.
, 1986, “
Crack Growth Resistance Curves in Strain Softening Materials
,”
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
0022-5096,
34
, pp.
593
607
.
13.
Cox
,
B. N.
, 1991, “
Extrinsic Factors in the Mechanics of Bridged Cracks
,”
Acta Metall. Mater.
0956-7151,
39
, pp.
1189
1201
.
14.
Fett
,
T.
,
Munz
,
D.
,
Dai
,
X.
, and
White
,
K. W.
, 2000, “
Bridging Stress Relation From a Combined Evaluation of the R-Curve and Post-Fracture Tensile Tests
,”
Int. J. Fract.
0376-9429,
104
, pp.
375
385
.
15.
Rice
,
J. R.
, 1972, “
Some Remarks on Elastic Crack-Tip Stress Fields
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
0020-7683,
8
, pp.
751
758
.
16.
Fett
,
T.
, and
Munz
,
D.
, 1997,
Stress Intensity Factors and Weight Functions
,
Computational Mechanics
,
Southampton, UK
.
17.
Hutchinson
,
J. W.
, and
Suo
,
Z.
, 1991, “
Mixed Mode Cracking in Layered Materials
,”
Adv. Appl. Mech.
0065-2156,
29
, pp.
63
191
.
18.
Mekky
,
W.
, and
Nicholson
,
P. S.
, 2007, “
R-Curve Modeling for Ni/Al2O3 Laminates
,”
Composites, Part B
1359-8368,
38
, pp.
35
43
.
19.
Fett
,
T.
,
Munz
,
D.
,
Seidel
,
J.
,
Stech
,
M.
, and
Rodel
,
J.
, 1996, “
Correlation Between Long and Short Crack R-Curves in Alumina Using the Crack Opening Displacement and Fracture Mechanical Weight Function Approach
,”
J. Am. Ceram. Soc.
0002-7820,
79
(
5
), pp.
1189
1196
.
20.
Rice
,
J. R.
, and
Wang
,
J. -S.
, 1989, “
Embrittlement of Interfaces by Solute Segregation
,”
Mater. Sci. Eng., A
0921-5093,
107
, pp.
23
40
.
21.
Rose
,
J. H.
,
Smith
,
J. R.
, and
Ferranie
,
J.
, 1983, “
Universal Features of Bonding in Metals
,”
Phys. Rev. B
0556-2805,
28
, pp.
1835
1845
.
You do not currently have access to this content.