Fiber reinforced composites, due to their higher specific strength and specific stiffness, are replacing many metallic structures. Of these, thick composite laminates are of high interest in various, millitary, transportation and marine applications for their use in ballistic and shock protection. One such application is in Composite Armored Vehicle (CAV) integral armor comprising of thick section composite that serves as the primary load-bearing component. The current solution of the structural backing laminate utilizes an S2-glass/epoxy system processed using automated fiber placement method. While proven structurally suitable, this method is time consuming as well as expensive. This paper presents several alternative cost-effective manufacturing solutions for fabricating composite laminates of 20 mm (0.8 in.) nominal thickness (made of 45 layer, 2 × 2 twill weave S2-glass with 933 sizing/vinyl ester C-50 resin), consisted with them CAV application in focus. They include Vacuum Assisted Resin Transfer Molding (VARTM) and Vacuum Assisted Resin Infusion Modeling (VARIM) and their variations. The effectiveness of different affordable processing approaches adopted in fabricating the structural laminate is compared in terms of static and dynamic compression response of the laminations. Static studies have been conducted on thick composites using specimen based on Army Material Technology Laboratory’s (AMTL) recommendation for thick section composites, while dynamic response is studied on cubic specimen samples using a Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB).

1.
Advanced Composities Technologies, Inc., 950 Spice Islands Dr., Sparks, NV 89431.
2.
Camponeschi, E. T., Jr., 1991, “Compression Testing of Thick Section Composite Materials,” Composite Materials: Fatigue and Fracture (Third Volume), ASTM STP 1110, T. K. O’Brien ed., ASTM, Philadelphia, pp. 439–456.
3.
Daniel, I. M., and Liber, T., 1978, “Testing of Fiber Reinforced Composites at High Strain Rates,” Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Composites Materials (ICCM/2), pp.1003–1018.
4.
El.-Habak
A. M. A.
,
1993
, “
Compressive Resistance of Unidirectional GFRP Under High Strain Rate of Loading
,”
Journal of Composites Technology and Research
, JCTRER, Vol.
15
, No.
4
, pp.
311
317
.
5.
Goeke, E. C., 1993, “Compression of Thick Composites: Two Test Methods,” Composite Materials: Testing and Design (Eleventh Volume), ASTM STP 1206, E. T. Camponeschi, Jr., ed., ASTM, Philadelphia, pp. 90–102.
6.
Hofer
K. E.
, and
Rao
P. V.
,
1977
, “
A New Static Compression Testing Fixture for Advanced Composite Materials
,”
Journal of Testing and Evaluation
, Vol.
5
(
4
), pp.
278
283
.
7.
Hsiao
H. M.
,
Daniel
I. M.
, and
Wooh
S. C.
,
1995
,“
A New Static Compression Test Method for Thick Composites
,”
Journal of Composite Materials
, Vol.
29
, No.
13
, pp.
1789
1806
.
8.
Karbhari, V. K., Wilkins, D. J., Steenkamer, D. A., and Slotte, S. G., 1991, “Effect of Perform Architecture and Injection Strategies on the Robustness of RTM Parts,” Advanced Composite Materials: New Developments and Applications, Conference Proceedings, Detroit, MI, YSA Sept. 30–Oct. 3, pp.91–103.
9.
Karbhari
V. K.
,
Slotte
S. G.
,
Steenkamer
D. A.
, and
Wilkins
D. J.
,
1992
, “
Effect of Material, Process, and Equipment Variables on the Performance of Resin Transfer Molded Parts
,”
Composites Manufacturing
, Vol.
3
, No.
3
, pp.
143
152
.
10.
Powers, B. M., and Vinson, J. R., 1996, “High Strain Rate Effects in Materials in Sandwich Construction,” Sandwhich Construction, 3rd Ed., Allen, H. G., ed., Engineering Materials Advisory Services, Ltd., England, pp.769–778.
11.
Powers, B. M., Vinson, J., R., Wardle, M., and Scott, B., 1995, “High Strain Rate Effects on Two AS4 Graphite Fiber Polymer Matrix Composites,” ASME Aerospace Division Board AD-48, High Strain Rate Effects on Polymer, Metal, and Ceramic Matrix Composites and Other Advanced Materials, pp.179–189.
12.
Preissner, E. C., Woldesenbet, E., and Vinson, J. R., 1997, “An Examination of High-Strain Rate Compressive Stress-Strain Behavior of a Kevlar/Epoxy Composite,” 12th Annual Technical Conference on Composite Materials, Dearborn, MI Oct. 6–8.
13.
Rodriguez
J.
,
Chocron
I. S.
,
Martinez
M. A.
, and
Sanchez-Galvez
V.
,
1996
, “
High Strain Rate Properties of Aramid and Polyetheylene Woven Fabric Composites
,”
Composites
, Part B, Engineering, Vol.
27
, No.
2
, pp.
147
154
.
14.
Seirakowsi, R. L., and Chaturvedi, S. K., 1997, “Dynamic Loading and Characterization of Fiber Reinforced Composites,” Wiley Interscience Publication, New York.
15.
Vaidya, U. K., Abraham, A., Mohamed, H., Fotedar, K., Haque, A., Krishnagopalan, J., Mahfuz, H., and Jeelani, S., 1997, “Manufacturing of Composite Integral Armor Using Liquid Molding Processes,” 29th International SAMPE Technical Conference, Oct. 28-Nov. 1., Florida, Green, Beckwith & Strong Ed., Vol. 29, pp. 523–531.
16.
Vaidya, U. K., Abraham, A., Hosur, M. V., Kumar, P., Haque, A., Mahfuz, H., and Jeelani, S., 1998, “Manufacturing of Thick Section Composites Using Low-Cost Liquid Molding Processes,” South Eastern Conference on Theoretical Applied Mechanics, May4-5, F1.
17.
Waas, A. M., Takeda, N., Yuan, J., and Lee, S., H., 1997, “Static and Dynamic Compressive Behavior of Glass Fiber Reinforced Unidirectional Composites,” Proceedings 12th Annual Technical Conference of American Society for Composites, pp.552–561.
18.
Woldenbet, E., and Vinson, J. R., 1997, “Effect of Specimen Geometry in High Strain Rate Testing of Graphite/Epoxy Composites,” Proceedings of 38th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structures, Strucural Dynamics, and Materials Conference.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.