Abstract

NASA’s Tool for Analysis of Surface Cracks (TASC) has been used since 2014 to perform elastic–plastic J-integral (J), crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD), crack front constraint, and deformation limit calculations for plates in tension. To date, no comparable database or tool exists for surface-cracked plates in bending. Existing tools and prior ASTM standards are limited to linear-elastic materials or simpler 2-D crack geometries. TASC uses a database of 600 models for interpolated solutions over a wide range of semielliptical surface crack geometries (0.2a/c1.0, 0.2a/t0.8) and material properties (100E/Sys1,000, 3n20). Here, a is the crack depth, c is the half-width of the crack, and t is the plate thickness, so that a/c is the crack aspect ratio and a/t is a normalized measurement of crack depth. E, Sys, and n are the plate’s elastic modulus, yield strength, and the Ramberg–Osgood power law hardening exponent, respectively. This report details the development of a bending model database covering the same range of crack geometries and material properties. It includes developing new criteria to determine if a model has reached sufficient plastic deformation and modifications to model boundary conditions to accurately capture the behavior of deeply cracked plates in bending. Python is the primary automation tool used in this process, including running FEACrack to create meshes, modifying material properties, iterating WARP3D boundary conditions to meet plastic deformation requirements, and converting WARP3D output into a reduced set of MATLAB-compatible data files. Bending model results from WARP3D are validated against Abaqus results for identical meshes. This report then shows the initial integration of bending models and results into the existing TASC code, laying the groundwork for a single tool for analysis of surface-cracked plates in tension or bending.

References

1.
Irwin
G. R.
, “
Crack-Extension Force for a Part-Through Crack in a Plate
,”
Journal of Applied Mechanics
29
, no. 
4
(December
1962
):
651
654
, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3640649
2.
Newman
J. C.
, “
A Review and Assessment of the Stress-Intensity Factors for Surface Cracks
,” in
Part-Through Crack Fatigue Life Prediction
, ed.
Chang
J. B.
(
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
,
1979
),
16
46
, https://doi.org/10.1520/STP687-EB
3.
Scott
P. M.
and
Thorpe
R. W.
, “
A Critical Review of Crack Tip Stress Intensity Factors for Semi-Elliptic Cracks
,”
Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures
4
, no. 
4
(October
1981
):
291
309
, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.1981.tb01127.x
4.
Hulbert
L. E.
, “
Benchmark Problems for Three-Dimensional Fracture Analysis
,”
International Journal of Fracture
13
, no. 
1
(February
1977
):
87
91
, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00040879
5.
Benchmark Editorial Committee of the SESA Fracture Committee “
A Critical Evaluation of Numerical Solutions to the ‘Benchmark’ Surface-Flaw Problem
,”
Experimental Mechanics
20
, no. 
8
(August
1980
):
253
264
, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02328409
6.
Swedlow
J. L.
, ed.,
The Surface Crack: Physical Problems and Computational Solutions, Presented at the Winter Annual Meeting of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers
(
New York
:
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
,
1972
).
7.
Chang
J. B.
, ed.,
Part-Through Crack Fatigue Life Prediction
(
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
,
1979
), https://doi.org/10.1520/STP687-EB
8.
Reuter
W. G.
,
Underwood
J. H.
, and
Newman
J. C.
, eds.,
Surface-Crack Growth: Models, Experiments, and Structures
(
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
,
1990
), https://doi.org/10.1520/STP1060-EB
9.
Raju
I. S.
and
Newman Jr
J. C.
., “
Stress-Intensity Factors for a Wide Range of Semi-Elliptical Surface Cracks in Finite-Thickness Plates
,”
Engineering Fracture Mechanics
11
, no. 
4
(
1979
):
817
829
, https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(79)90139-5
10.
Newman
J. C.
 Jr.
and
Raju
I. S.
, “
An Empirical Stress-Intensity Factor Equation for the Surface Crack
,”
Engineering Fracture Mechanics
15
, nos. 
1–2
(
1981
):
185
192
, https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(81)90116-8
11.
Southwest Research Institute “
NASGRO® Fracture Mechanics & Fatigue Crack Growth Software
,” Southwest Research Institute,
2019
, https://web.archive.org/web/20190713144452/https://www.swri.org/consortia/nasgro
12.
LexTech “
AFGROW (Air Force Growth) Fracture Mechanics and Fatigue Crack Growth Analysis Software Tool
,” LexTech,
2019
, https://web.archive.org/web/20191213215719/https://www.afgrow.net/
13.
Rice
J. R.
and
Rosengren
G. F.
, “
Plane Strain Deformation near a Crack Tip in a Power-Law Hardening Material
,”
Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids
16
, no. 
1
(January
1968
):
1
12
, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(68)90013-6
14.
Begley
J. A.
and
Landes
J. D.
, “
The J-Integral as a Fracture Criterion
,” in
Fracture Toughness: Part II
, ed.
Corten
H. T.
(
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
,
1972
),
1
23
, https://doi.org/10.1520/STP514-EB
15.
Wang
Y.-Y.
,
Parks
D. M.
,
Lloyd
W. R.
,
Reuter
W. G.
, and
Epstein
J.
, “
Elastic-Plastic Deformation in Surface-Cracked Plates: Experiment and Numerical Analysis
,”
Journal of Applied Mechanics
58
, no. 
4
(December
1991
):
895
903
, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2897703
16.
Kirk
M. T.
and
Dodds
R. H.
 Jr.
, “
Approximate Techniques of J-Estimation Applicable to Part-Through Surface Cracks
,”
Engineering Fracture Mechanics
43
, no. 
1
(September
1992
):
123
136
, https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(92)90319-A
17.
Yagawa
G.
,
Kitajima
Y.
, and
Ueda
H.
, “
Three-Dimensional Fully Plastic Solutions for Semi-Elliptical Surface Cracks
,”
International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping
53
, no. 
3
(
1993
):
457
510
, https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-0161(93)90073-3
18.
Sharobeam
M. H.
and
Landes
J. D.
, “
Numerical Solutions for Ductile Fracture Behavior Semi-Elliptical Surface Crack
,”
Engineering Fracture Mechanics
63
, no. 
2
(May
1999
):
131
145
, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(99)00017-X
19.
Lei
Y.
, “
J-Integral and Limit Load Analysis of Semi-Elliptical Surface Cracks in Plates under Combined Tension and Bending
,”
International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping
81
, no. 
1
(January
2004
):
43
56
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2003.12.002
20.
Standard Test Method for Linear-Elastic Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness KIc of Metallic Materials
(Superseded), ASTM E399-17 (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved November 15,
2017
), https://doi.org/10.1520/E0399-17
21.
Standard Practice for Fracture Testing with Surface-Crack Tension Specimens
, ASTM E740/E740M-03 (2016) (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved October 1,
2016
), https://doi.org/10.1520/E0740_E0740M-03R16
22.
Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness
(Superseded), ASTM E1820-18ae1 (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved November 1,
2018
), https://doi.org/10.1520/E1820-18AE01
23.
Williams
M. L.
, “
On the Stress Distribution at the Base of a Stationary Crack
,”
Journal of Applied Mechanics
24
, no. 
1
(
1956
):
109
114
.
24.
Betegón
C.
and
Hancock
J. W.
, “
Two-Parameter Characterization of Elastic-Plastic Crack-Tip Fields
,”
Journal of Applied Mechanics
58
, no. 
1
(March
1991
):
104
110
, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2897135
25.
Hancock
J. W.
,
Reuter
W. G.
, and
Parks
D. M.
, “
Constraint and Toughness Parameterized by T
,” in
Constraint Effects in Fracture
, ed.
Hackett
E. M.
,
Schwalbe
K.-H.
, and
Dodds
R. H.
(
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
,
1993
), 21–40, https://doi.org/10.1520/STP18021S
26.
O’Dowd
N. P.
and
Shih
C. F.
, “
Family of Crack-Top Fields Characterized by a Triaxiality Parameter—I. Structure of Fields
,”
Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids
39
, no. 
8
(
1991
):
989
-
1015
, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(91)90049-T
27.
O’Dowd
N. P.
and
Shih
C. F.
, “
Family of Crack-Top Fields Characterized by a Triaxiality Parameter—II. Fracture Applications
,”
Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids
40
, no. 
5
(July
1992
):
939
963
, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(92)90057-9
28.
Gutpa
M.
,
Alderliesten
R. C.
, and
Benedictus
R.
, “
A Review of T-Stress and Its Effects in Fracture Mechanics
,”
Engineering Fracture Mechanics
134
(January
2015
):
218
241
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.10.013
29.
Cicero
S.
,
Ainsworth
R. A.
, and
Gutiérrez-Solana
F.
, “
Engineering Approaches for the Assessment of Low Constraint Fracture Conditions: A Critical Review
,”
Engineering Fracture Mechanics
77
, no. 
8
(May
2010
):
1360
1374
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.02.026
30.
Shlyannikov
V. N.
,
Boychenko
N. V.
,
Tumanov
A. V.
, and
Fernández-Canteli
A.
, “
The Elastic and Plastic Constraint Parameters for Three-Dimensional Problems
,”
Engineering Fracture Mechanics
127
(September
2014
):
83
96
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.05.015
31.
Yang
J.
, “
The Matching of Crack-Tip Constraint between Standard and Non-standard Specimen
,”
Advances in Mechanical Engineering
10
, no. 
4
(April
2018
):
1
8
, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1687814018771765
32.
Wang
X.
, “
Two-Parameter Characterization of Elastic-Plastic Crack Front Fields: Surface Cracked Plates under Tensile Loading
,”
Engineering Fracture Mechanics
76
, no. 
7
(May
2009
):
958
982
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.01.002
33.
Wang
X.
, “
Two-Parameter Characterization of Elastic–Plastic Crack Front Fields: Surface Cracked Plates under Uniaxial and Biaxial Bending
,”
Engineering Fracture Mechanics
96
(December
2012
):
122
146
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.07.014
34.
Standard Test Method for Measurement of Initiation Toughness in Surface Cracks under Tension and Bending
(Superseded), ASTM E2899-15 (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved June 1,
2015
), https://doi.org/10.1520/E2899-15
35.
Allen
P. A.
, “
Tool for Analysis of Surface Cracks (TASC)
,”
2014
, https://web.archive.org/web/20200128164740/https://sourceforge.net/projects/tascnasa/
36.
Wells
D. N.
and
Allen
P. A.
,
“Analytical Round Robin for Elastic-Plastic Analysis of Surface Cracked Plates: Phase I Results
,” NASA/TM—2012–217456 (
Washington, DC
:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
,
2012
).
37.
Allen
P. A.
and
Wells
D. N.
,
Analytical Round Robin for Elastic-Plastic Analysis of Surface Cracked Plates: Phase II Results
, NASA/TM—2017–218233 (
Washington, DC
:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
,
2017
).
38.
Allen
P. A.
and
Wells
D. N.
, “
Interpolation Methodology for Elastic–Plastic J-Integral Solutions for Surface Cracked Plates in Tension
,”
Engineering Fracture Mechanics
119
(March
2014
):
173
201
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.02.021
39.
Allen
P. A.
and
Wells
D. N.
, “
Application of Automation Methods for Nonlinear Fracture Test Analysis
,” in
Application of Automation Technology in Fatigue and Fracture Testing and Analysis
, ed.
McKeighan
P.
and
Braun
A.
(
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
,
2014
),
31
49
, https://doi.org/10.1520/STP157120130062
40.
Allen
P. A.
and
Wells
D. N.
,
Elastic-Plastic J-Integral Solutions for Surface Cracks in Tension Using an Interpolation Methodology
, NASA/TP—2013–217480 (
Washington, DC
:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
,
2013
).
41.
Renfro
M.
, “
Analysis of Surface Cracks in Plates Loaded in Bending under Elastic-Plastic and Fully-Plastic Conditions
,”
2018
, https://web.archive.org/web/20190523195853/https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mikerenfro/phd/master/dissertation/dissertation-renfro-embedded.pdf
42.
Renfro
M.
, “
PhD Dissertation: Analysis of Surface Cracks in Plates Loaded in Bending under Elastic-Plastic and Fully-Plastic Conditions
,” GitHub,
2019
, https://web.archive.org/web/20200128164150/https://github.com/mikerenfro/phd/
43.
Renfro
M.
, “
NASA TASC: Tool for Analysis of Surface Cracks
,” GitHub,
2019
, https://web.archive.org/web/20200128163720/https://github.com/mikerenfro/tasc
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.