1-20 of 53788
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Articles
Journal Articles
Journal Articles
Journal Articles
Journal Articles
Journal Articles
Journal Articles
Image
Image
Illustration of CDT and heterogeneous agents with embedded cognitive intelligence of perception, situational understanding, learning, and reasoning to optimize actions under disruptions
Published Online: June 27, 2025
Fig. 2 Illustration of CDT and heterogeneous agents with embedded cognitive intelligence of perception, situational understanding, learning, and reasoning to optimize actions under disruptions More about this image found in Illustration of CDT and heterogeneous agents with embedded cognitive intell...
Image
Image
Experimental configuration of cyber-physical twins in case studies including 20 machines (9 lathes, 4 milling machines, 3 drills, 3 welders, and 1 AGV charging station) and 6 AGVs for material handling
Published Online: June 27, 2025
Fig. 4 Experimental configuration of cyber-physical twins in case studies including 20 machines (9 lathes, 4 milling machines, 3 drills, 3 welders, and 1 AGV charging station) and 6 AGVs for material handling More about this image found in Experimental configuration of cyber-physical twins in case studies includin...
Image
Experimental design for (a) evaluating role-specific impacts on KPIs (i.e., productivity, task transition, workload balance, and transport efficiency) and (b) benchmarking with conventional scheduling methods
Published Online: June 27, 2025
Fig. 5 Experimental design for ( a ) evaluating role-specific impacts on KPIs (i.e., productivity, task transition, workload balance, and transport efficiency) and ( b ) benchmarking with conventional scheduling methods More about this image found in Experimental design for (a) evaluating role-specific impacts on KPIs (i.e.,...
Image
Impacts of role-specific objective weights αS (Sender focus), αR (Receiver focus), and αD (Deliverer focus) on KPIs: (a) system productivity (measured as TIS) (b) task transition congestion (Queue-Out lengths) (c) workload balance (variance of Queue-In lengths) and (d) transport efficiency (TEI)
Published Online: June 27, 2025
Fig. 6 Impacts of role-specific objective weights α S ( Sender focus), α R ( Receiver focus), and α D ( Deliverer focus) on KPIs: ( a ) system productivity (measured as TIS) ( b ) task transition congestion (Queue-Out lengths) ( c ) workload balance (variance of Queue... More about this image found in Impacts of role-specific objective weights α S (Sender focus), ...
Image
Performance comparison of average TIS (time in system) across different scheduling approaches under varying job IATs and AGV counts, with (a) nAGV=4, (b) nAGV=5, and (c) nAGV=6, respectively
Published Online: June 27, 2025
Fig. 7 Performance comparison of average TIS (time in system) across different scheduling approaches under varying job IATs and AGV counts, with ( a ) n A G V = 4 , ( b ) n A G V = 5 , and ( c ) n A G V = 6 , respectively More about this image found in Performance comparison of average TIS (time in system) across different sch...
Image
Performance comparison of KPIs—(1) task transition congestion (Q¯OUT), (2) workload balance (WB¯), and (3) transport efficiency (TEI¯)—across different scheduling approaches under varying scenarios: (a) nAGV=6 and IAT =5s and (b) nAGV=6 and IAT=50s
Published Online: June 27, 2025
Fig. 8 Performance comparison of KPIs—(1) task transition congestion ( Q ¯ O U T ), (2) workload balance ( W B ¯ ), and (3) transport efficiency ( T E I ¯ )—across different scheduling approaches under varying scenarios: ( a ) n A G V = 6 and... More about this image found in Performance comparison of KPIs—(1) task transition congestion ( Q ¯ ...
Image
Comparison of system throughput (number of finished jobs (nJob)) across different scheduling approaches under varying scenarios of job IATs and AGV counts, where (a) nAGV=4, (b) nAGV=5, and (c) nAGV=6
Published Online: June 27, 2025
Fig. 9 Comparison of system throughput (number of finished jobs ( n J o b )) across different scheduling approaches under varying scenarios of job IATs and AGV counts, where ( a ) n A G V = 4 , ( b ) n A G V = 5 , and ( c ) n A G V = 6 More about this image found in Comparison of system throughput (number of finished jobs ( n J o b ...
Image
Image
Methodology architecture for layer-wise emission prediction with explainable artificial intelligence where (a) is the non-interpretable flowchart and (b) is the explainable artificial intelligence framework
Published Online: June 27, 2025
Fig. 2 Methodology architecture for layer-wise emission prediction with explainable artificial intelligence where ( a ) is the non-interpretable flowchart and ( b ) is the explainable artificial intelligence framework More about this image found in Methodology architecture for layer-wise emission prediction with explainabl...
Image
Image