Traditional surface texture analysis involves filtering surface profiles into different wavelength bands commonly referred to as roughness, waviness and form. The primary motivation in filtering surface profiles is to map each band to the manufacturing process that generated the part and the intended functional performance of the component. Current trends in manufacturing are towards tighter tolerances and higher performance standards that require close monitoring of the process. Thus, there is a need for finer bandwidths for process mapping and functional correlation. Wavelets are becoming increasingly popular tools for filtering profiles in an efficient manner into multiple bands. While they have broadly been demonstrated as having superior performance and capabilities than traditional filtering, fundamental issues such as choice of wavelet bases have remained unaddressed. The major contribution of this paper is to present the differences between wavelets in terms of the transmission characteristics of the associated filter banks, which is essential for surface analysis. This paper also reviews fundamental mathematics of wavelet theory necessary for applying wavelets to surface texture analysis. Wavelets from two basic categories—orthogonal wavelet bases and biorthogonal wavelet bases are studied. The filter banks corresponding to the wavelets are compared and multiresolution analysis on surface profiles is performed to highlight the applicability of this technique.

1.
ASME B46.1, 1995, Surface Texture (Surface Roughness, Waviness, and Lay).
2.
Raja
,
J.
,
Muralikrishnan
,
B.
, and
Fu
,
S.
,
2002
, “
Recent Advances in Separation of Roughness, Waviness and Form
,” Precis. Eng., 26(2).
3.
Jiang
,
X. Q.
,
Blunt
,
L.
, and
Stout
,
K. J.
,
2000
, “
Development of a Lifting Wavelet Representation for Surface Characterization
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
,
456
, pp.
2283
2313
.
4.
Chen
,
X.
,
Raja
,
J.
, and
Simanapali
,
S.
,
1995
, “
Multi-Scale Analysis of Engineering Surfaces
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.
,
35
(
2
), pp.
231
238
.
5.
Liu
,
X.
, and
Raja
,
J.
,
1996
, “
The Application of Wavelet Filter Bank in Surface Metrology
,” SPIE, 2825, Aug.
6.
Chen
,
Q.
,
Yang
,
S.
, and
Li
,
Z.
,
1999
, “
Surface Roughness Evaluation by Using Wavelet Analysis
,” Precis. Eng., 23.
7.
Heisenberg, Werner, 1949, Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory, Dover Publications Inc.
8.
Mallat
,
Stephane
,
1989
, “
Multifrequency Channel Decompositions of Images and Wavelet Models
,”
IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process
,
37
(
12
), pp.
2091
2110
.
9.
Meyer, Y., 1993, Wavelets: Analysis and Applications, SIAM Press, Philadelphia.
10.
Mallat, Stephane, 1999, A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing, Second edition, Academic Press.
11.
Strang, G., and Nguyen, T. Q., 1996, Wavelets and Filter Banks, Wellesley-Cambridge Press, Wellesley.
12.
Daubechies, I., 1992, Ten Lectures on Wavelets, The Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
13.
Daubechies, I., 1989, “Orthonormal Bases of Compactly Supported Wavelets II. Variations on a Theme,” Technical Memo., #11217-891116-17, AT&T Bell Labs., Murray Hill.
14.
Daubechies
,
I.
,
1988
, “
Orthonormal Bases of Compactly Supported Wavelets
,”
Commun. Pure Appl. Math.
,
41
, pp.
909
996
.
15.
Cohen
,
A.
,
Daubechies
,
I.
, and
Feauveau
,
J. C.
,
1992
, “
Biorthogonal Bases of Compactly Supported Wavelets
,”
Commun. Pure Appl. Math.
45, pp.
485
560
.
16.
ISO 11562, 1996, Geometrical Product Specification (GPS)—Surface Texture: Profile Method—Metrological Characteristics of Phase Correct Filters, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
17.
Bhargava, S., and Grant, M. B., 1993, “Taguchi Methods and Tolerance Assignment—The Wavelength Aspects of Surface Metrology,” Proceedings of the 1993 International Forum on Dimensional Tolerancing and Metrology, Dearborn, MI, June 17–19.
18.
Liu
,
X.
,
Raja
,
J.
, and
Sannareddy
,
H.
,
1995
, “
Assessment of Plateau Honed Surface Texture Using Wavelet Transform
,”
Proc. ASPE
,
14
, pp.
672
675
.
19.
Jiang, X. Q., Blunt, L., and Stout, K. J., 1997, “
Evaluation of Functional Features of the Orthopaedic Joint Prosthses Surfaces Using Wavelet Analysis,” Proc. ASPE 1997 Spring Topical Meeting, Advances in Surface Metrology, Annapolis, Maryland.
20.
Thomas
,
T. R.
, and
Charlton
,
G.
,
1981
, “
Variation of Roughness Parameters on Some Typical Manufactured Surfaces
,”
Precis. Eng.
,
3
(
2
), pp.
91
96
.
21.
ISO 13565-1:1996(E), Geometrical Product Specification (GPS)—Surface Texture: Profile Method; Surfaces Having Stratified Functional Properties—Part 1: Filtering and General Measurement Conditions, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
You do not currently have access to this content.