A gradient-based optimization approach is employed to select design tolerances for the component dimensions of a mechanical assembly to minimize manufacturing cost while achieving a desired probability of meeting functional requirements, known as the yield. Key to the feasibility of such an approach is to be able to use Monte Carlo simulation to make estimates of the derivatives of the yield with respect to the design tolerances quickly and accurately. A new approach for making these estimates is presented and is shown to be far faster and more accurate than previous approaches. Gradient-based optimization using the new approach for estimating the derivatives is applied to example problems from the literature. The solutions are superior to all previously published solutions and are obtained with very reasonable computer run times. Additional advantages of a gradient-based approach are described.

1.
Hong
,
Y. S.
, and
Chang
,
T. C.
, 2002, “
A Comprehensive Review of Tolerancing Research
,”
Int. J. Prod. Res.
0020-7543,
40
(
11
), pp.
2425
2459
.
2.
Gao
,
J.
,
Chase
,
K. W.
, and
Magleby
,
S. P.
, 1995, “
Comparison of Assembly Tolerance Analysis by Direct Linearization and Modified Monte Carlo Simulation Methods
,” Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Boston, pp.
353
360
.
3.
Lee
,
W. J.
, and
Woo
,
T. C.
, 1990, “
Tolerances: Their Analysis and Synthesis
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
0022-0817,
112
, pp.
113
121
.
4.
Jordaan
,
J. P.
, and
Ungerer
,
C. P.
, 2002, “
Optimization of Design Tolerances Through Response Surface Approximations
,”
ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
1087-1357,
124
, pp.
762
767
.
5.
Lee
,
J.
, and
Johnson
,
G. E.
, 1993, “
Optimal Tolerance Allotment Using a Genetic Algorithm and Truncated Monte Carlo Simulation
,”
Comput.-Aided Des.
0010-4485,
25
(
9
), pp.
601
611
.
6.
Iannuzzi
,
M.
, and
Sandgren
,
E.
, 1994, “
Optimal Tolerancing: The Link Between Design and Manufacturing Productivity
,”
Sixth International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology
,
ASME
,
New York
, Vol.
68
, pp.
29
42
.
7.
Loof
,
J.
,
Hermansson
,
T.
, and
Soderberg
,
R.
, 2007, “
An Efficient Solution to the Discrete Least-Cost Tolerance Allocation Problem With General Loss Functions
,”
Models for Computer Aided Tolerancing in Design and Manufacturing
,
Springer
,
The Netherlands
, pp.
115
124
.
8.
Glasserman
,
P.
, 1991,
Gradient Estimation Via Perturbation Analysis
,
Kluwer Academic
,
Boston
.
9.
Fu
,
M. C.
, and
Hu
,
J. Q.
, 1997,
Conditional Monte Carlo: Gradient Estimation and Optimization Applications
,
Kluwer Academic
,
Boston
.
10.
Fu
,
M. C.
, 2006, “
Stochastic Gradient Estimation
,”
Handboooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Simulation
,
S. G.
Henderson
and
B. L.
Nelson
, eds.,
Elsevier
,
New York
, Chap 19.
11.
Law
,
A. M.
, and
Kelton
,
W. D.
, 2000,
Simulation Modeling and Analysis
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
, p.
613
.
12.
Bowman
,
A.
, and
Schmee
,
J.
, 2004, “
Estimating Sensitivity of Process Capability Modeled by a Transfer Function
,”
J. Quality Technol.
0022-4065,
36
(
2
), pp.
223
243
.
You do not currently have access to this content.