Abstract

Rapid advances in digital twin (DT) provide an unprecedented opportunity to derive data-enabled intelligence for smart manufacturing. However, traditional DT is more concerned about real-time data streaming, dashboard visualization, and predictive analytics, but focuses less on multiagent intelligence. This limitation hampers the development of agentic intelligence for decentralized decision-making in complex manufacturing environments. Therefore, this article presents a cognitive digital twin (CDT) approach for multiobjective production scheduling through decentralized, collaborative multiagent learning. First, we propose to construct models of heterogeneous agents (e.g., machines, jobs, automated guided vehicles, and automated storage and retrieval systems) that interact with physical and digital twins. Second, multiobjective optimization is embedded in CDT to align production schedules with diverse and often conflicting objectives such as throughput, task transition efficiency, and workload balance. Third, we develop a multiagent learning approach to enable decentralized decision-making in response to unexpected disruptions and dynamic demands. Each agent operates independently and collaboratively with cognitive capabilities, including perception, learning, and reasoning, to optimize the individual agentic objective while contributing to overarching system-wide goals. Finally, the proposed CDT is evaluated and validated with experimental studies in a learning factory environment. Experimental results demonstrate that CDT improves operational performance in terms of task allocation, resource utilization, and system resilience compared to traditional centralized approaches. This initial study of CDT highlights the potential to bring multiagent cognitive intelligence into next-generation smart manufacturing.

References

1.
Yang
,
H.
,
Kumara
,
S.
,
Bukkapatnam
,
S. T.
, and
Tsung
,
F.
,
2019
, “
The Internet of Things for Smart Manufacturing: A Review
,”
IISE Trans.
,
51
(
11
), pp.
1190
1216
.
2.
Lee
,
H.
, and
Yang
,
H.
,
2023
, “
Digital Twinning and Optimization of Manufacturing Process Flows
,”
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
,
145
(
11
), p.
111008
.
3.
Neisser
,
U.
,
1967
,
Cognitive Psychology: Classic Edition
,
Psychology Press
,
New York
.
4.
Tao
,
F.
,
Qi
,
Q.
,
Wang
,
L.
, and
Nee
,
A.
,
2019
, “
Digital Twins and Cyber–Physical Systems Toward Smart Manufacturing and Industry 4.0: Correlation and Comparison
,”
Engineering
,
5
(
4
), pp.
653
661
.
5.
Soori
,
M.
,
Arezoo
,
B.
, and
Dastres
,
R.
,
2023
, “
Digital Twin for Smart Manufacturing, a Review
,”
Sustain. Manuf. Serv. Econ.
,
2
, p.
100017
.
6.
Krall
,
A.
,
Finke
,
D.
, and
Yang
,
H.
,
2023
, “
Virtual Sensing Network for Statistical Process Monitoring
,”
IISE Trans.
,
55
(
11
), pp.
1103
1117
.
7.
Yang
,
H.
, and
Yao
,
B.
,
2023
,
Sensing, Modeling and Optimization of Cardiac Systems: A New Generation of Digital Twin for Heart Health Informatics
,
Springer Nature
,
Berlin
.
8.
Ali
,
M. I.
,
Patel
,
P.
,
Breslin
,
J. G.
,
Harik
,
R.
, and
Sheth
,
A.
,
2021
, “
Cognitive Digital Twins for Smart Manufacturing
,”
IEEE Intell. Syst.
,
36
(
2
), pp.
96
100
.
9.
Jinzhi
,
L.
,
Zhaorui
,
Y.
,
Xiaochen
,
Z.
,
Jian
,
W.
, and
Dimitris
,
K.
,
2022
, “
Exploring the Concept of Cognitive Digital Twin From Model-Based Systems Engineering Perspective
,”
Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.
,
121
(
9
), pp.
5835
5854
.
10.
Xu
,
W.
,
Yang
,
H.
,
Ji
,
Z.
, and
Ba
,
M.
,
2024
, “
Cognitive Digital Twin-Enabled Multi-Robot Collaborative Manufacturing: Framework and Approaches
,”
Comput. Ind. Eng.
,
194
, p.
110418
.
11.
Gershwin
,
S. B.
,
2018
, “
The Future of Manufacturing Systems Engineering
,”
Int. J. Prod. Res.
,
56
(
1–2
), pp.
224
237
.
12.
Krall
,
A.
,
Finke
,
D.
, and
Yang
,
H.
,
2024
, “
Distributed Cryptosystem for Service-Oriented Smart Manufacturing
,”
IISE Trans.
,
56
(
12
), pp.
1346
1359
.
13.
Qin
,
Z.
, and
Lu
,
Y.
,
2021
, “
Self-Organizing Manufacturing Network: A Paradigm Towards Smart Manufacturing in Mass Personalization
,”
J. Manuf. Syst.
,
60
, pp.
35
47
.
14.
Chaudhry
,
I. A.
, and
Khan
,
A. A.
,
2016
, “
A Research Survey: Review of Flexible Job Shop Scheduling Techniques
,”
Int. Trans. Oper. Res.
,
23
(
3
), pp.
551
591
.
15.
Lin
,
C.-S.
,
Li
,
P.-Y.
,
Wei
,
J.-M.
, and
Wu
,
M.-C.
,
2020
, “
Integration of Process Planning and Scheduling for Distributed Flexible Job Shops
,”
Comput. Oper. Res.
,
124
, p.
105053
.
16.
Ren
,
W.
,
Yan
,
Y.
,
Hu
,
Y.
, and
Guan
,
Y.
,
2022
, “
Joint Optimisation for Dynamic Flexible Job-Shop Scheduling Problem With Transportation Time and Resource Constraints
,”
Int. J. Prod. Res.
,
60
(
18
), pp.
5675
5696
.
17.
Kuo
,
T.
, and
Yang
,
H.
,
2024
, “
Federated Learning on Distributed and Encrypted Data for Smart Manufacturing
,”
J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng.
,
24
(
7
), p.
071007
.
18.
Miao
,
M.-P.
,
Sang
,
H.-Y.
,
Wang
,
Y.-T.
,
Zhang
,
B.
, and
Tian
,
M.-X.
,
2023
, “
Joint Scheduling of Parallel Machines and AGVs With Sequence-Dependent Setup Times in a Matrix Workshop
,”
Comput. Ind. Eng.
,
185
, p.
109621
.
19.
Hosseini
,
A.
,
Otto
,
A.
, and
Pesch
,
E.
,
2024
, “
Scheduling in Manufacturing With Transportation: Classification and Solution Techniques
,”
Eur. J. Oper. Res.
,
315
(
3
), pp.
821
843
.
20.
Kim
,
Y. G.
,
Lee
,
S.
,
Son
,
J.
,
Bae
,
H.
, and
Chung
,
B. D.
,
2020
, “
Multi-Agent System and Reinforcement Learning Approach for Distributed Intelligence in a Flexible Smart Manufacturing System
,”
J. Manuf. Syst.
,
57
, pp.
440
450
.
21.
Zhang
,
Y.
,
Zhu
,
H.
,
Tang
,
D.
,
Zhou
,
T.
, and
Gui
,
Y.
,
2022
, “
Dynamic Job Shop Scheduling Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Agent Manufacturing Systems
,”
Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf.
,
78
, p.
102412
.
22.
The Pennsylvania State University
,
2024
, “
Factory for Advanced Manufacturing Education Lab
,” https://www.ime.psu.edu/research/facilities-and-labs/fame.aspx.
You do not currently have access to this content.