Abstract

Industrial artificial intelligence (IAI) and other analysis tools with obfuscated internal processes are growing in capability and ubiquity within industrial settings. Decision-makers share their concern regarding the objective evaluation of such tools and their impacts at the system level, facility level, and beyond. One application where this style of tool is making a significant impact is in Condition Monitoring Systems (CMSs). This paper addresses the need to evaluate CMSs, a collection of software and devices that alert users to changing conditions within assets or systems of a facility. The presented evaluation procedure uses CMSs as a case study for a broader philosophy evaluating the impacts of IAI tools. CMSs can provide value to a system by forewarning faults, defects, or other unwanted events. However, evaluating CMS value through scenarios that did not occur is rarely easy or intuitive. Further complicating this evaluation are the ongoing investment costs and risks posed by the CMS from imperfect monitoring. To overcome this, an industrial facility needs to regularly and objectively review CMS impacts to justify investments and maintain competitive advantage. This paper's procedure assesses the suitability of a CMS for a system in terms of risk and investment analysis. This risk-based approach uses the changes in the likelihood of good and bad events to quantify CMS value without making any one-time pointwise estimates. Fictional case studies presented in this paper illustrate the procedure and demonstrate its usefulness and validity.

References

1.
Rehorn
,
A. G.
,
Jiang
,
J.
, and
Orban
,
P. E.
,
2005
, “
State-of-the-Art Methods and Results in Tool Condition Monitoring: A Review
,”
Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.
,
26
(
7–8
), pp.
693
710
.
2.
Roth
,
J. T.
,
Djurdjanovic
,
D.
,
Yang
,
X.
,
Mears
,
L.
, and
Kurfess
,
T.
,
2010
, “
Quality and Inspection of Machining Operations: Tool Condition Monitoring
,”
ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
,
132
(
4
), p.
041015
.
3.
Wu
,
D.
,
Jennings
,
C.
,
Terpenny
,
J.
,
Gao
,
R. X.
, and
Kumara
,
S.
,
2017
, “
A Comparative Study on Machine Learning Algorithms for Smart Manufacturing: Tool Wear Prediction Using Random Forests
,”
ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
,
139
(
7
), p.
071018
.
4.
Jeschke
,
S.
,
Brecher
,
C.
,
Meisen
,
T.
,
Özdemir
,
D.
, and
Eschert
,
T.
,
2017
, “Industrial Internet of Things and Cyber Manufacturing Systems,”
Industrial Internet of Things
,
Springer
,
Cham
, pp.
3
19
.
5.
Parida
,
A.
,
2016
, “
Asset Performance Measurement and Management: Bridging the Gap Between Failure and Success
,”
Measurement
,
9000
(
14000
), p.
55
.
6.
Shrieve
,
P.
,
1993
, “Implementing a Cost-Effective Machinery Condition Monitoring Program,”
Profitable Condition Monitoring
,
Springer
,
Dordrecht
, pp.
3
10
.
7.
Nicholls
,
C.
,
1989
, “Cost-Effective Condition Monitoring,”
COMADEM 89 International
,
Springer
,
Boston, MA
, pp.
335
347
.
8.
Nilsson
,
J.
, and
Bertling
,
L.
,
2007
, “
Maintenance Management of Wind Power Systems Using Condition Monitoring Systems—Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Two Case Studies
,”
IEEE Trans. Energy Convers.
,
22
(
1
), pp.
223
229
.
9.
Chang
,
M.-H.
,
Sandborn
,
P.
,
Pecht
,
M.
,
Yung
,
W. K.
, and
Wang
,
W.
,
2015
, “
A Return on Investment Analysis of Applying Health Monitoring to LED Lighting Systems
,”
Microelectron. Reliab.
,
55
(
3–4
), pp.
527
537
.
10.
Feldman
,
K.
, and
Sandborn
,
P.
,
2008
, “
Analyzing the Return on Investment Associated With Prognostics and Health Management of Electronic Products
,”
International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
, Vol.
43277
, pp.
1401
1409
.
11.
Zio
,
E.
,
2016
, “
Some Challenges and Opportunities in Reliability Engineering
,”
IEEE Trans. Reliab.
,
65
(
4
), pp.
1769
1782
.
12.
Swanson
,
L.
,
2001
, “
Linking Maintenance Strategies to Performance
,”
Int. J. Prod. Econ.
,
70
(
3
), pp.
237
244
.
13.
Valdez-Flores
,
C.
, and
Feldman
,
R. M.
,
1989
, “
A Survey of Preventive Maintenance Models for Stochastically Deteriorating Single-Unit Systems
,”
Nav. Res. Logist.
,
36
(
4
), pp.
419
446
.
14.
Kaplan
,
S.
, and
John Garrick
,
B.
,
1981
, “
On the Quantitative Definition of Risk
,”
Risk Anal.
,
1
(
1
), pp.
11
27
.
15.
Zio
,
E.
,
2007
,
An Introduction to the Basics of Reliability and Risk Analysis
, Vol.
13
,
World Scientific
,
Singapore
.
16.
Dunjó
,
J.
,
Fthenakis
,
V.
,
Vílchez
,
J. A.
, and
Arnaldos
,
J.
,
2010
, “
Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) Analysis. A Literature Review
,”
J. Hazard. Mater.
,
173
(
1–3
), pp.
19
32
.
17.
Paté-Cornell
,
M. E.
,
1984
, “
Fault Trees vs. Event Trees in Reliability Analysis
,”
Risk Anal.
,
4
(
3
), pp.
177
186
.
18.
Lee
,
J.
,
Davari
,
H.
,
Singh
,
J.
, and
Pandhare
,
V.
,
2018
, “
Industrial Artificial Intelligence for Industry 4.0-Based Manufacturing Systems
,”
Manufacturing letters
,
18
, pp.
20
23
.
19.
Gao
,
Z.
,
Cecati
,
C.
, and
Ding
,
S. X.
,
2015
, “
A Survey of Fault Diagnosis and Fault-Tolerant Techniques—Part I: Fault Diagnosis With Model-Based and Signal-Based Approaches
,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
,
62
(
6
), pp.
3757
3767
.
20.
Lee
,
J.
,
1995
, “
Machine Performance Monitoring and Proactive Maintenance in Computer-Integrated Manufacturing: Review and Perspective
,”
Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf.
,
8
(
5
), pp.
370
380
.
21.
Paté-Cornell
,
M. E.
,
1996
, “
Uncertainties in Risk Analysis: Six Levels of Treatment
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
,
54
(
2–3
), pp.
95
111
.
22.
Herrmann
,
J. W.
,
2015
,
Engineering Decision Making and Risk Management
,
John Wiley & Sons
,
Hoboken, NJ
.
23.
Modarres
,
M.
,
2006
,
Risk Analysis in Engineering: Techniques, Tools, and Trends
,
CRC Press
,
Boca Raton, FL
.
24.
Spreafico
,
C.
,
Russo
,
D.
, and
Rizzi
,
C.
,
2017
, “
A State-of€-the-Art Review of FMEA/FMECA Including Patents
,”
Comput. Sci. Rev.
,
25
, pp.
19
28
.
25.
U.S. Department of Defense
,
1980
, Military Standard: Procedures for Performing a Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis, MIL-STD-1629A.
26.
U.S. Department of Defense
,
2012
, Military Standard: Department of Defense Standard Practice: System Safety, MIL-STD-882E.
27.
Horst
,
J.
,
Hedberg
,
T.
, and
Feeney
,
A. B.
,
2019
,
On-Machine Measurement Use Cases and Information for Machining Operations
,
US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology
,
Gaithersberg, MD
.
28.
Barajas
,
L. G.
, and
Srinivasa
,
N.
,
2008
, “
Real-Time Diagnostics, Prognostics and Health Management for Large-Scale Manufacturing Maintenance Systems
,”
International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference
,
Evanston, IL
,
Oct. 7–10
, Vol.
48524
, pp.
85
94
.
29.
Compare
,
M.
,
Baraldi
,
P.
, and
Zio
,
E.
,
2020
, “
Challenges to IoT-Enabled Predictive Maintenance for Industry 4.0
,”
IEEE Internet Things J.
,
7
(
5
), pp.
4585
4597
.
30.
Society of Automotive Engineers
.
Recommended Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) Practices for Non-Automobile Application
.
SAE ARP 5580: 2001 (R2020)
.
31.
Society of Automotive Engineers
.
Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Design (Design FMEA), Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Manufacturing and Assembly Processes (Process FMEA)
.
SAE J1739: 2009
.
32.
U.S. Department of Defense
,
1998
.
Military Handbook: Electronic Reliability Design Handbook
,
MIL-HDBK-338B
.
33.
JA1011, S. A. E
,
1999
,
Evaluation Criteria for Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM) Processes
,
Society for Automotive Engineers
.
34.
Thomas
,
D.
,
2017
, “
Investment Analysis Methods: A Practitioner’s Guide to Understanding the Basic Principles for Investment Decisions in Manufacturing
,”
NIST Advanced Manufacturing Series 200-5
.
35.
Cooke
,
R.
, and
Bedford
,
T.
,
2002
, “
Reliability Databases in Perspective
,”
IEEE Trans. Reliab.
,
51
(
3
), pp.
294
310
.
36.
Hillman
,
C.
,
2013
, “
No MBTF? Do You Know MBTF?
,”
DfR Solutions Resources Paper
.
37.
Dempster
,
A. P.
,
1968
, “
A Generalization of Bayesian Inference
,”
J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol.
,
30
(
2
), pp.
205
232
.
38.
Zadeh
,
L. A.
,
1965
, “
Fuzzy Sets
,”
Inf. Control.
,
8
(
3
), pp.
338
353
.
39.
Aven
,
T.
,
Baraldi
,
P.
,
Flage
,
R.
, and
Zio
,
E.
,
2013
,
Uncertainty in Risk Assessment: The Representation and Treatment of Uncertainties by Probabilistic and Non-Probabilistic Methods
,
John Wiley & Sons
,
Hoboken, NJ
.
40.
Javed
,
K.
,
Gouriveau
,
R.
, and
Zerhouni
,
N.
,
2017
, “
State of the Art and Taxonomy of Prognostics Approaches, Trends of Prognostics Applications and Open Issues Towards Maturity at Different Technology Readiness Levels
,”
Mech. Syst. Signal Process
,
94
, pp.
214
236
.
41.
Zhou
,
D. P.
,
Hu
,
Q.
, and
Tomlin
,
C. J.
,
2017
, “
Quantitative Comparison of Data-Driven and Physics-Based Models for Commercial Building HVAC Systems
,”
Proceedings of American Control Conference (ACC)
,
IEEE
, pp.
2900
2906
.
42.
Bedford
,
T.
, and
Cooke
,
R.
,
2001
,
Probabilistic Risk Analysis: Foundations and Methods
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge
, pp.
70
73
.
43.
National Institute of Standards and Technology
,
2020
,
Smart Investment Tool. Version 1.0
, https://www.nist.gov/services-resources/software/smart-investment-tool
44.
Reid
,
S. G.
,
2000
, “
Acceptable Risk Criteria
,”
Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater.
,
2
(
2
), pp.
254
262
.
You do not currently have access to this content.