This paper presents a comprehensive review on the sources of model inaccuracy and parameter uncertainty in metal laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) process. Metal additive manufacturing (AM) involves multiple physical phenomena and parameters that potentially affect the quality of the final part. To capture the dynamics and complexity of heat and phase transformations that exist in the metal L-PBF process, computational models and simulations ranging from low to high fidelity have been developed. Since it is difficult to incorporate all the physical phenomena encountered in the L-PBF process, computational models rely on assumptions that may neglect or simplify some physics of the process. Modeling assumptions and uncertainty play significant role in the predictive accuracy of such L-PBF models. In this study, sources of modeling inaccuracy at different stages of the process from powder bed formation to melting and solidification are reviewed. The sources of parameter uncertainty related to material properties and process parameters are also reviewed. The aim of this review is to support the development of an approach to quantify these sources of uncertainty in L-PBF models in the future. The quantification of uncertainty sources is necessary for understanding the tradeoffs in model fidelity and guiding the selection of a model suitable for its intended purpose.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
April 2019
Research-Article
A Review of Model Inaccuracy and Parameter Uncertainty in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Models and Simulations
Tesfaye Moges,
Tesfaye Moges
1
Engineering Laboratory,
Gaithersburg, MD 20899
e-mail: tesfaye.moges@nist.gov
National Institute of Standards and Technology
,Gaithersburg, MD 20899
e-mail: tesfaye.moges@nist.gov
1Corresponding author.
Search for other works by this author on:
Gaurav Ameta,
Gaurav Ameta
Engineering Laboratory,
Gaithersburg, MD 20899
e-mail: gaurav.ameta@nist.gov
National Institute of Standards and Technology
,Gaithersburg, MD 20899
e-mail: gaurav.ameta@nist.gov
Search for other works by this author on:
Paul Witherell
Paul Witherell
Engineering Laboratory,
Gaithersburg, MD 20899
e-mail: paul.witherell@nist.gov
National Institute of Standards and Technology
,Gaithersburg, MD 20899
e-mail: paul.witherell@nist.gov
Search for other works by this author on:
Tesfaye Moges
Engineering Laboratory,
Gaithersburg, MD 20899
e-mail: tesfaye.moges@nist.gov
National Institute of Standards and Technology
,Gaithersburg, MD 20899
e-mail: tesfaye.moges@nist.gov
Gaurav Ameta
Engineering Laboratory,
Gaithersburg, MD 20899
e-mail: gaurav.ameta@nist.gov
National Institute of Standards and Technology
,Gaithersburg, MD 20899
e-mail: gaurav.ameta@nist.gov
Paul Witherell
Engineering Laboratory,
Gaithersburg, MD 20899
e-mail: paul.witherell@nist.gov
National Institute of Standards and Technology
,Gaithersburg, MD 20899
e-mail: paul.witherell@nist.gov
1Corresponding author.
Manuscript received July 16, 2018; final manuscript received December 19, 2018; published online February 28, 2019. Assoc. Editor: Kevin Chou. This material is declared a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. Apr 2019, 141(4): 040801 (14 pages)
Published Online: February 28, 2019
Article history
Received:
July 16, 2018
Revision Received:
December 19, 2018
Accepted:
December 19, 2018
Citation
Moges, T., Ameta, G., and Witherell, P. (February 28, 2019). "A Review of Model Inaccuracy and Parameter Uncertainty in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Models and Simulations." ASME. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. April 2019; 141(4): 040801. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4042789
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Special Section: Manufacturing Science Engineering Conference 2024
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (November 2024)
Anisotropy in Chip Formation in Orthogonal Cutting of Rolled Ti-6Al-4V
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (January 2025)
Modeling and Experimental Investigation of Surface Generation in Diamond Micro-Chiseling
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (February 2025)
Estimation of Temperature Rise in Magnetorheological Fluid-Based Finishing of Thin Substrate: A Theoretical and Experimental Study
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (February 2025)
Related Articles
Three-Dimensional Sintering of Two-Component Metal Powders With
Stationary and Moving Laser Beams
J. Heat Transfer (February,2000)
Numerical Modeling of Metal-Based Additive Manufacturing Using Level Set Methods
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (July,2017)
Toward Metamodels for Composable and Reusable Additive Manufacturing Process Models
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (December,2014)
Application of Deep Transfer Learning and Uncertainty Quantification for Process Identification in Powder Bed Fusion
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (March,2022)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Advances in the Stochastic Modeling of Constitutive Laws at Small and Finite Strains
Advances in Computers and Information in Engineering Research, Volume 2
Numerical Study on Dynamic Charging Performance of Packed Bed Using Spherical Capsules Containing N-Tetradecane
Inaugural US-EU-China Thermophysics Conference-Renewable Energy 2009 (UECTC 2009 Proceedings)
Developing Human Performance Measures (PSAM-0207)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)