Incremental forming (IF) of sheet metal is emerging as a useful flexible manufacturing process for forming customized shapes, some of which may not be formable using conventional techniques due to limitations of tooling or forming limit. In IF, the toolpath has a significant impact on the geometric accuracy, surface finish, and forming time of the formed component. Toolpath generation techniques used until date are based on commercial CAM packages (Skjoedt et al., 2007, “Creating 3D Spiral Tool Paths for Single Point Incremental Forming,” Key Eng. Mater., 344, pp. 583–590; Verbert et al., 2007, “Feature Based Approach for Increasing the Accuracy of the SPIF Process,” Key Eng. Mater., 344, pp. 527–534) and do not allow the generation of 3D spiral toolpaths for freeform components with constraints on both surface finish and geometric accuracy while simultaneously minimizing forming time. This work exploits the similarities between incremental forming and layered manufacturing to develop a methodology for automatic generation of 3D spiral single point incremental forming toolpaths for forming symmetric and asymmetric components, considering specified constraints on desired geometric accuracy and maximum specified scallop height while reducing the forming time. To test the developed methodology, the scallop heights of components formed using the developed methodology are measured and compared with the maximum permissible scallop heights specified. Furthermore, the geometric accuracy and forming time of the components formed using the developed methodology and by the toolpaths generated using commercial CAM software are compared. It is shown that the toolpaths generated using the developed methodology form components with better or similar geometric accuracy as compared with that generated by commercial CAM packages and with scallop heights lesser than the maximum permissible scallop height specified by the user. At the same time, the developed methodology also reduces the forming time as compared with commercial CAM toolpaths. This methodology can handle symmetric as well as asymmetric shapes and is a critical step toward automation of the toolpath generation for incremental forming.

1.
Jeswiet
,
J.
,
Micari
,
F.
,
Hirt
,
G.
,
Bramley
,
A.
,
Duflou
,
J.
, and
Allwood
,
J.
, 2005, “
Asymmetric Incremental Sheet Forming
,”
Adv. Mater. Res.
1022-6680,
6–8
, pp.
35
58
.
2.
Filice
,
L.
,
Fratini
,
L.
, and
Micari
,
F.
, 2002, “
Analysis of Material Formability in Incremental Forming
,”
CIRP Ann.
0007-8506,
51
(
1
), pp.
199
202
.
3.
Kim
,
T. J.
, and
Yang
,
D. Y.
, 2000, “
Improvement of Formability for the Incremental Sheet Metal Forming Process
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
0020-7403,
42
, pp.
1271
1286
.
4.
Young
,
D.
, and
Jeswiet
,
J.
, 2004, “
Wall Thickness Variations in Single-Point Incremental Forming
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part B
0954-4054,
218
(
11
), pp.
1453
1459
.
5.
Hirt
,
G.
,
Ames
,
J.
,
Bambach
,
M.
, and
Kopp
,
R.
, 2004, “
Forming Strategies and Process Modelling for CNC Incremental Sheet Forming
,”
CIRP Ann.
0007-8506,
53
(
1
), pp.
203
206
.
6.
Kopac
,
J.
, and
Kampus
,
Z.
, 2005, “
Incremental Sheet Metal Forming on CNC Milling Machine-Tool
,”
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
0924-0136,
162–163
, pp.
622
628
.
7.
Attanasio
,
A.
,
Ceretti
,
E.
, and
Giardini
,
C.
, 2006, “
Optimization of Tool Path in Two Points Incremental Forming
,”
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
0924-0136,
177
, pp.
409
412
.
8.
Bambach
,
M.
,
Ames
,
J.
,
Azaouzi
,
M.
,
Campagne
,
L.
,
Hirt
,
G.
, and
Batoz
,
J. L.
, 2005, “
Initial Experimental and Numerical Investigation Into a Class of New Strategies for Single Point Incremental Sheet Forming (SPIF)
,”
Proceedings of the Rapid Prototyping and Rapid Tooling ESA FORM 2005 Conference
, pp.
671
674
.
9.
Skjoedt
,
M.
,
Hancock
,
M. H.
, and
Bay
,
N.
, 2007, “
Creating 3D Spiral Tool Paths for Single Point Incremental Forming
,”
Key Eng. Mater.
1013-9826,
344
, pp.
583
590
.
10.
Verbert
,
J.
,
Duflou
,
J. R.
, and
Lauwers
,
B.
, 2007, “
Feature Based Approach for Increasing the Accuracy of the SPIF Process
,”
Key Eng. Mater.
1013-9826,
344
, pp.
527
534
.
11.
Hagen
,
E.
, and
Jeswiet
,
J.
, 2004, “
Analysis of Surface Roughness for Parts Formed by CNC Incremental Forming
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part B
0954-4054,
219
, pp.
1
6
.
12.
Ham
,
M.
,
Powers
,
B.
,
Brown
,
C. A.
,
Jeswiet
,
J.
, and
Hamilton
,
K.
, 2009, “
Roughness Evaluation of Single Point Incrementally Formed Surfaces
,”
Trans. NAMRI/SME
1047-3025,
37
, pp.
411
418
.
13.
Allwood
,
J. M.
,
Music
,
O.
,
Raithathna
,
A.
, and
Duncan
,
S. R.
, 2009, “
Closed-Loop Feedback Control of Product Properties in Flexible Metal Forming Processes With Mobile Tools
,”
CIRP Ann.
0007-8506,
58
(
1
), pp.
287
290
.
14.
Lee
,
E.
, 2003, “
Contour Offset Approach to Spiral Toolpath Generation With Constant Scallop Height
,”
Comput.-Aided Des.
0010-4485,
35
, pp.
511
518
.
15.
Pandey
,
P. M.
,
Reddy
,
N. V.
, and
Dhande
,
S. G.
, 2003, “
Slicing Procedures in Layered Manufacturing
,”
Rapid Prototyping J.
1355-2546,
9
(
5
), pp.
274
288
.
17.
Malhotra
,
R.
, 2008, “
Automatic Tool Path Generation for Single Point Incremental Forming
,” MS thesis, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, India.
You do not currently have access to this content.