A simple testing device is presented that simultaneously calibrates all dominant error sources for accelerometers and gyroscopes found in typical microelectromechanical inertial measurement units on smart projectiles, including bias, scale factor, cross axis sensitivity/misalignment, and misposition. The device consists of a table which rotates about a gimbal joint and is supported on the corners by elastic and damping elements. Using dynamic simulation it is shown that motion created by free vibration of the testing platform suitably excites sensors on projectiles so calibration can be performed. Calibration parameters are estimated using an extended Kalman filter. Platform support stiffness and damping characteristics significantly alter the time required to identify calibration parameters by shaping platform motion. A critical level of initial motion of the testing platform is required for adequate prediction of calibration parameters.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
sensors, weapons, Kalman filters, calibration, manufacturing systems, defence industry, parameter estimation, accelerometers
Topics:
Accelerometers, Calibration, Errors, Sensors, Projectiles, Kalman filters, Bullets
1.
Tustin
,
W.
,
1987
, “
How to Calibrate Accelerometer Systems
,”
Evaluation Engineering
,
26
, pp.
68
–
73
.
2.
McConnell, K. G., and Han, S. B., 1991, “A Theoretical Basis for Cross-Axis Corrections in Tri-Axial Accelerometers,” Proceedings of the International Modal Analysis Conference, Vol. 1, pp. 171–175.
3.
Witter, M. C., and Brown, D. L., 1998, “Broadband 6 DOF Accelerometer Calibration Via Impact Excitation,” Proceedings of the 16th International Modal Analysis Conference, Vol. 2, pp. 907–914.
4.
Boutillon
,
X.
, and
Faure
,
C.
,
1998
, “
The Mean-Projection Method for the Transverse Calibration of Accelerometers
,”
Acustica United
,
84
(
2
), pp.
348
–
358
.
5.
Sutton
,
C. M.
,
1990
, “
Accelerometer Calibration by Dynamic Position Measurement Using Heterodyne Laser Interferometry
,”
Metrologia
,
27
, pp.
133
–
138
.
6.
Payne
,
B.
, and
Evans
,
D. J.
,
1999
, “
Comparison of Results of Calibrating the Magnitude of the Sensitivity of Accelerometers by Laser Interferometry and Reciprocity
,”
Metrologia
,
36
, pp.
391
–
394
.
7.
Gabrielson
,
T. B.
,
1997
, “
Free-Mass Reciprocity Calibration
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
,
102
, pp.
2800
–
2808
.
8.
Grewal
,
M. S.
,
1991
, “
Application of Kalman filtering to the Calibration and Alignment of Inertial Navigation Systems
,”
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control
,
36
(
1
), pp.
4
–
12
.
9.
Kong, X., Nebot, E. M., and Durrant-Whyte, H., 1999, “Development of a Non-Linear Psi-Angle Model for Large Misalignment Errors and its Application is INS Alignment and Calibration,” Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Vol. 2, pp. 1430–1435.
10.
Ginsberg, J. H., 1995, Advanced Engineering Dynamics, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, ISBN 0521-47021-8.
11.
Grewal, M. S., and Andrews, A. P., 2001, Kalman Filtering Theory and Practice Using MATLAB, John Wiley & Sons, United States, pp. 114–164.
12.
Grewal, M. S., and Andrews, A. P., 2001, Kalman Filtering Theory and Practice Using MATLAB, John Wiley & Sons, United States, pp. 169–199.
Copyright © 2004
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.