The dynamics of the cutting process is modeled for investigating the relationship between tool wear and sound generation during surface turning. The vibration of the tool holder, together with the cutting insert, is considered as the main source of sound associated with tool wear. In this research, the tool holder-cutting insert combination is simplified as a cantilever beam which is excited by an external force that is directly related to tool wear. Based on this model, the displacement of the cutting tool is shown to be directly affected by tool wear and process characteristics. Simulation results show a change in the sound signal distribution over frequency as tool wear increases. A transfer function that includes the process characteristics is also developed to investigate the capability of sound and vibration signals in tool wear monitoring for a specific process. This provides critical information for sensor selection in implementing a tool failure monitoring system in reconfigurable manufacturing.

1.
Micheletti
,
C. F.
,
Koenig
,
W.
, and
Victor
,
H. R.
,
1976
, “
In Process Tool Wear Sensors for Cutting Operations
,”
CIRP Ann.
,
25
, pp.
483
496
.
2.
Cook
,
N. H.
,
1980
, “
Tool Wear Sensors
,”
Wear
,
62
, pp.
49
57
.
3.
Tlusty
,
J.
, and
Andrews
,
G. C.
,
1983
, “
A Critical Review of Sensors for Unmanned Machining
,”
CIRP Ann.
,
32
(
2
), pp.
563
572
.
4.
Jetly
,
S.
,
1984
, “
Measuring Cutting Tool Wear On-Line: Some Practical Considerations
,”
Manuf. Eng.
,
,
55
60
.
5.
Shiraishi
,
M.
,
1988
, “
Scope of In-Process Measurement, Monitoring and Control Techniques in Machining Processes—Part 1: In-Process Techniques for Tools
,”
Precis. Eng.
,
10
(
4
), pp.
179
188
.
6.
Dan
,
L.
, and
Mathew
,
J.
,
1990
, “
Tool Wear and Failure Monitoring Techniques for Turning—A review
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.
,
30
(
4
), pp.
579
598
.
7.
Dornfeld
,
D. A.
,
1994
, “
In Process Recognition of Cutting Stages
,”
JSME International Journal, Series C
,
37
(
4
), pp.
638
650
.
8.
Teti
,
R.
,
1995
, “
A Review of Tool Condition Monitoring Literature Data Base
,”
CIRP Ann.
,
44
(
2
), pp.
659
666
.
9.
Weller
,
E. J.
,
Schrier
,
H. M.
, and
Weichbrodt
,
B.
,
1969
, “
What Sound Can Be Expected from A Worn Tool
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
91
, pp.
525
534
.
10.
Sadat
,
A. B.
, and
Raman
,
S.
,
1987
, “
Detection of Tool Flank Wear Using Acoustic Signature Analysis
,”
Wear
,
115
, pp.
265
272
.
11.
Anderson, D., 1988, “Method for Monitoring Cutting Tool Wear During a Machining Operation,” The Boeing Company, USA, USP. 04744242.
12.
Trabelsi
,
H.
, and
Kannatey-Asibu
,
E.
, Jr.
,
1991
, “
Pattern-Recognition Analysis of Sound Radiation in Metal Cutting
,”
Int. J. of Advanced Manufacturing Tech.
,
6
, pp.
220
231
.
13.
Delio
,
T.
,
Tlusty
,
J.
, and
Smith
,
S.
,
1992
, “
Use of Audio Signals for Chatter Detection and Control
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
114
, pp.
146
157
.
14.
Lu
,
M.
, and
Kannatey-Asibu
,
E.
, Jr.
,
2002
, “
Analysis of Sound Signal Generation Due to Flank Wear in Turning
,”
ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
,
124
, pp.
779
808
.
15.
Meirovitch, L., 1967, “Natural Modes of Vibration. Continuous Systems,” Analytical Methods in Vibrations, Macmillan, New York.
16.
Shaw, Milton, 1984, “Mechanics of Orthogonal Cutting,” Metal Cutting Principles, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 18–46.
17.
Ewins, D. J., 1986, Modal Testing: Theory and Practice, Research Studies Press Ltd., Letchworth, Hertfordshire, England.
18.
Felbeck, D. K., and Atkins, A. G., 1996, Strength and Fracture of Engineering Solids, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River.
19.
Ludema, K. C., 1996, Friction, Wear, Lubrication, A Textbook in Tribology, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton.
20.
Rice
,
S. L.
, and
Moslehy
,
F. A.
,
1997
, “
Modeling Friction and Wear Phenomena
,”
Wear
,
206
, pp.
136
146
.
You do not currently have access to this content.