Complexity of manufacturing processes has hindered methodical specification of machine setpoints for improving productivity. Traditionally in injection molding, the machine setpoints are assigned either by trial and error, based on heuristic knowledge of an experienced operator, or according to an empirical model between the inputs and part quality attributes, which is obtained from statistical design of experiments (DOE). In this paper, a Knowledge-Based Tuning (KBT) Method is presented which takes advantage of the a priori knowledge of the process, in the form of a qualitative model, to reduce the demand for experimentation. The KBT Method provides an estimate of the process feasible region (process window) as the basis of finding the suitable setpoints, and updates its knowledge-base using the data that become available during tuning. As such, the KBT Method has several advantages over conventional tuning methods: (1) the qualitative model provides a generic form of representation for linear and nonlinear processes alike, therefore, there is no need for selecting the form of the empirical model through trial and error, (2) the use of a priori knowledge eliminates the need for initial trials to construct an empirical model, so an initial feasible region can be identified as the basis of search for the suitable setpoints, and (3) the search within the feasible region leads to a higher fidelity model of this region when the input/output data from consecutive process iterations are used for learning. The KBT Method’s utility is demonstrated in production of digital video disks (DVDs).

1.
Agrawal
,
A. R.
, and
Pandelidis
,
I. O.
,
1987
, “
Injection-Molding Process Control-a Review
,”
Polym. Eng. Sci.
,
27
, pp.
1345
1357
.
2.
Amellal
,
K.
,
Tzoganakis
,
C.
,
Penlidis
,
A.
, and
Rempel
,
G. L.
,
1994
, “
Injection Molding of Medical Plastics: a Review
,”
Adv. Polym. Technol.
,
13
, pp.
315
322
.
3.
Farrell, R. E., and Dzeskievicz, L., 1994, “Expert Systems for Injection Molding,” SPE ANTEC Conference Proceedings.
4.
Kameoka
,
S.
,
Haramoto
,
N.
, and
Sakai
,
T.
,
1993
, “
Development of an Expert System for Injection Molding Operations
,”
Adv. Polym. Technol.
,
12
, pp.
403
418
.
5.
Rogers
,
J. K.
,
1991
, “
Intelligent’ Molding: Expert Systems Are Coming on Line Now
,”
Mod. Plast.
,
68
, pp.
56
60
.
6.
Jong, W. R., and Hsu, S. S., 1997, “An Integrated Expert System for Injection-Molding Process,” SPE ANTEC Conference Proceedings.
7.
Jan
,
T. C.
, and
O’Brien
,
K. T.
,
1993
, “
A User-friendly, Interactive Expert System for the Injection Molding of Engineering Thermoplastics
,”
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
,
8
, pp.
42
51
.
8.
Pandelidis
,
I. O.
, and
Kao
,
J. F.
,
1990
, “
DETECTOR, a Knowledge-Based System for Injection Molding Diagnostics
,”
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing
,
1
, pp.
49
58
.
9.
Shelesh-Nezhad
,
K.
, and
Siores
,
E.
,
1997
, “
An Intelligent System for Plastic Injection Molding Process Design
,”
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
,
63
, pp.
458
462
.
10.
Schmidt, S., and Launsby, R., 1988, Understanding Industrial Designed Experiments, Air Academy Press, Colorado Springs, Colorado.
11.
Neter, J., Kutner, H. M., Nachtsheim, C. J., and Wasserman, W., 1996, Applied Linear Statistical Models, IRWIN, 4th ed.
12.
Phadke, M., 1989, Quality Engineering Using Robust Design, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
13.
Budill, K., 1993, “A Systematic Approach to Tool Qualification for Injection Molding,” Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA.
14.
Martin, M. F., Bontumasi, F., and Young, G., 1995, “The Practical Application of Design of Experiments in the Total Quality Injection Molding Process,” SPE ANTEC Conference Proceedings, Boston, MA.
15.
Michaeli, W., Vaculik, R., and Bluhm, R., 1995, “Reprocessing of Recyclat-on-Line Prediction of Quality Attributes,” SPE ANTEC Conference Proceedings, Boston, MA.
16.
Michaeli, W., and Vaculik, R., 1995, “Closed Loop Quality Control for Injection Molding based on Statistical Process Models,” SPE ANTEC Conference Proceedings, Boston, MA.
17.
Vaatainen
,
O.
,
Jarvela
,
P.
,
Valta
,
K.
, and
Jarvela
,
P.
,
1994
, “
The Effect of Processing Parameters on the Quality of Injection Moulded Parts by Using the Taguchi Parameter Design Method
,”
Plast. Rubber Process. Applic.
,
21
, pp.
211
17
.
18.
Ivester
,
R.
, and
Danai
,
K.
,
1998
, “
Tuning and Automatic Regulation of Injection Molding by the Virtual Search Method
,”
ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
,
120
, pp.
323
329
.
19.
Moore, R. E., 1979, Methods and Applications of Interval Analysis, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia.
20.
Hatch, D., 1999, “Transfer Function Development for the Injection Molding of Optical Media,” Master’s thesis, University Of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
You do not currently have access to this content.