Sensing for the system-wide diagnosis of dimensional faults in multi-fixture sheet metal assembly presents significant issues of complexity due to the number of levels of assembly and the number of possible faults at each level. The traditional allocation of sensing at a single measurement station is no longer sufficient to guarantee adequate fault diagnostic information for the increased parts and levels of a complex assembly system architecture. This creates a need for an efficient distribution of limited sensing resources to multiple measurement locations in assembly. The proposed methodology achieves adequate diagnostic performance by configuring sensing to provide an optimally distinctive signature for each fault in assembly. A multi-level, two-step, hierarchical optimization procedure using problem decomposition, based on assembly structure data derived directly from CAD files, is used to obtain such a novel, distributed sensor configuration. Diagnosability performance is quantified in the form of a defined index, which serves the dual purpose of guiding the optimization and establishing the diagnostic worth of any candidate sensor distribution. Examples, using a multi-fixture layout, are presented to illustrate the methodology. [S1087-1357(00)70801-X]

1.
Ceglarek
,
D.
,
Shi
,
J.
, and
Wu
,
S. M.
,
1994
, “
A Knowledge-based Diagnosis Approach For The Launch Of The Auto-body Assembly Process
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
116
, No.
4
, pp.
491
499
.
2.
de Kleer
,
J.
, and
Williams
,
B. C.
,
1987
, “
Diagnosing Multiple Faults
,”
Artif. Intel.
,
32
, pp.
97
130
.
3.
Reiter
,
R.
,
1987
, “
A Theory Of Diagnosis From First Principles
,”
Artif. Intel.
,
32
, pp.
57
96
.
4.
Wu
,
T. D.
,
1991
, “
Problem Decomposition Method For Efficient Diagnosis And Interpretation Of Multiple Disorders
,”
Comput. Methods Programs Biomed.
,
35
, No.
4
, pp.
239
250
.
5.
Ceglarek
,
D.
, and
Shi
,
J.
,
1996
, “
Fixture Failure Diagnosis For Autobody Assembly Using Pattern Recognition
,”
ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
,
118
, No.
1
, pp.
55
66
.
6.
Genesereth
,
M. R.
,
1984
, “
The Use Of Design Descriptions In Automated Diagnosis
,”
Artif. Intel.
,
24
, pp.
411
436
.
7.
Khan
,
A. M.
,
Ceglarek
,
D.
,
Shi
,
J.
,
Ni
,
J.
, and
Woo
,
T. C.
,
1999
, “
Sensor Optimization For Fault Diagnosis In Single Fixture Systems: A Methodology
,”
ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
,
121
, No.
1
, pp.
109
117
.
1.
De Fazio
,
T. L.
, and
Whitney
,
D. E.
,
1987
, “
Simplified Generation Of All Mechanical Assembly Sequences
,”
IEEE J. Robotics Automation
,
3
, pp.
640
705
;
2.
and
1998
, Corrections,
IEEE J. Robotics Automation
,
4
, pp.
705
708
.
1.
Homem de Mello
,
L. S.
, and
Sanderson
,
A. C.
,
1991
, “
Representation Of Mechanical Assembly Sequences
,”
IEEE Trans. Robotics Automation
,
7
, pp.
211
227
.
2.
Khan
,
A. M.
,
Ceglarek
,
D.
, and
Ni
,
J.
,
1998
, “
Sensor Location Optimization For Fault Diagnosis in Multi-Fixture Assembly Systems
,”
ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
,
120
, No.
4
, pp.
781
792
.
3.
Zeigler, B. P., 1992, “Systems Formulation of a Theory of Diagnosis from First Principles,” IEEE Trans. Reliab., 41, No. 1.
4.
Ceglarek
,
D.
, and
Shi
,
J.
,
1998
, “
Design Evaluation of Sheet Metal Joints for Dimensional Integrity
,”
ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
120
, No.
2
,
452
460
.
5.
Matlab: Optimization Toolbox User’s Guide, The MathWorks, Inc.
You do not currently have access to this content.