Under normal machining conditions, the cutting forces are primarily due to the bulk shearing of the workpiece material in a narrow zone called the shear zone. However, under finishing conditions, when the uncut chip thickness is of the order of the cutting edge radius, a ploughing component of the forces becomes significant as compared to the shear forces. Predicting forces under these conditions requires an estimate of ploughing. A slip-line field is developed to model the ploughing components of the cutting force. The field is based on other slip-line fields developed for a rigid wedge sliding on a half-space and for negative rake angle orthogonal cutting. It incorporates the observed phenomena of a small stable build-up of material adhered to the edge and a raised prow of material formed ahead of the edge. The model shows how ploughing forces are related to cutter edge radius—a larger edge causing larger ploughing forces. A series of experiments were run on 6061-T6 aluminum using tools with different edge radii—including some exaggerated in size—and different levels of uncut chip thickness. Resulting force measurements match well to predictions using the proposed slip-line field. The results show great promise for understanding and quantifying the effects of edge radius and worn tool on cutting forces.

1.
Albrecht, P., “New Developments in the Theory of the Metal-Cutting Process, Part 1. The Ploughing Process in Metal Cutting,” ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY, Nov. 1960, pp. 348–357.
2.
Palmer, W. B., and Yeo, R. C. K., “Metal Flow Near the Tool Point during Orthogonal Cutting with a Blunt Tool,” Proc. 4th Int. MTDR Conf., 1963, pp. 61–71.
3.
Johnson
W.
, “
Cutting with Tools having a Rounded Edge: Some Theoretical Considerations
,”
Annals of the CIRP
, Vol.
14
,
1967
, pp.
315
319
.
4.
Abdel Moneim, M. Es. and Scrutton, R. F., “Tool Edge Roundness and Stable Build-Up Formation in Finish Machining,” ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY, Nov. 1974, pp. 1258–1267.
5.
Heginbotham
W. B.
, and
Gogia
S. L.
, “
Metal Cutting and the Built-up Nose
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs.
, Vol.
175
, No.
18
,
1961
, pp.
892
905
.
6.
Rubenstein
C.
, “
The Edge Force Components in Oblique Cutting
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufact.
, Vol.
30
, No.
I
,
1990
, pp.
141
149
.
7.
Zhang
H. T.
,
Liu
P. D.
, and
Hu
R. S.
, “
A Three-zone Model and Solution of Shear Angle in Orthogonal Machining
,”
Wear
, Vol.
143
,
1991
, pp.
29
43
.
8.
Sarwar, M., and Thompson, P. J., “Cutting Action of Blunt Tools,” Proc. 22nd Int. MTDR Conf. 1981, pp. 295–304.
9.
Parthimos
D.
, and
Ehmann
K. F.
, “
A Model for the Stress Field Around the Shear Zone
,”
Trans. of NAMRI/SME
, Vol.
21
,
1993
, pp.
197
204
.
10.
Wu
D. William
, “
Application of a Comprehensive Dynamic Cutting Force Model to Orthogonal Wave-generating Processes
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
, Vol.
30
, No.
8
,
1988
, pp.
581
600
.
11.
Endres
W. J.
,
DeVor
R. E.
, and
Kapoor
S. G.
, “
A Dual-Mechanism Approach to the Prediction of Machining Forces, Part 1 and 2
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY
, Vol.
117
, November
1995
, pp.
526
541
.
12.
Elanayar, V. T. S., and Shin, Y. C., “Modeling of Tool Forces for Worn Tools: Flank Wear Effects,” Materials Issues in Machining-II and The Physics of Machining Processes-II. Proceedings of the Winter Annual Meeting of ASME and the Fall Meeting of the Minerals, Metals, and Materials Society, 1994, pp. 341–361.
13.
Elbestawi, M. A., Ismail, F., Du, R., and Ullagaddi, B. C., “Modelling Machining Dynamics Including Damping in the Tool-Workpiece Interface,” Tribological Aspects in Manufacturing, ASME WAM, PED-Vol. 54/Trib-Vol. 2, 1991, pp. 253–264.
14.
Sisson, T. R., and Kegg, R. L., “An Explanation of Low-Speed Chatter Effects,” ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY, Nov. 1969, pp. 951–958.
15.
Albrecht, P., “Dynamics of the Metal-Cutting Process,” ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY, Nov. 1965, pp. 429–441.
16.
Haslam
D.
, and
Rubenstein
C.
, “
Surface and Sub-surface Work-hardening Produced by the Planing Operation
,”
Annals of the CIRP
, Vol.
18
,
1970
, pp.
369
381
.
17.
Thomsen, E. G., Lapsley, J. T., Jr., and R. C. Grassi, “Deformation Work Absorbed by the Workpiece During Metal Cutting,” Transactions of the ASME, May 1953, pp. 591–598.
18.
Usui
E.
,
Shirakashi
T.
, and
Kitagawa
T.
, “
Analytical Prediction of Cutting Tool Wear
,”
Wear
, Vol.
100
,
1984
, pp.
129
151
.
19.
Connolly
R.
, and
Rubenstein
C.
, “
The Mechanics of Continuous Chip Formation in Orthogonal Cutting
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tool Design Res.
, Vol.
8
,
1968
, pp.
159
187
.
20.
Waldorf, D. J., DeVor, R. E., and Kapoor, S. G., “On the Phenomenon of a Stable Build-up on a Large Cutting Edge Radius,” Proceedings of the ASME 1996 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Symposium on the Physics of Machining Processes, November 1996.
21.
Black
A. J.
,
Kopalinsky
E. M.
, and
Oxley
P. L. B.
, “
Asperity Deformation Models for Explaining the Mechanisms Involved in Metallic Sliding Friction and Wear—a Review
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs., Part C: J. of Mech. Eng. Science
, Vol.
207
,
1993
, pp.
335
207
.
22.
Challen
J. M.
, and
Oxley
P. L. B.
, “
An Explanation of the Different Regimes of Friction and Wear using Asperity Deformation Models
,”
Wear
, Vol.
53
,
1979
, pp.
229
243
.
23.
Avitzur, B., and Zhu, Y. D., “A Friction Model Based on the Upper-bound Approach to the Ridge and Sublayer Deformations—Update,” Proc. 13th NAMRC, 1985, pp. 103–109.
24.
Abebe, M. and Appl, F. C., “A Slip-line Solution for Negative Rake Angle Cutting,” Proc. 19th NAMRC, 1981, pp. 341–348.
25.
Kita
Y.
,
Ido
M.
, and
Kawasaki
N.
, “
A Study of Metal Flow Ahead of Tool Face with Large Negative Rake Angle
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY
, Vol.
104
, August,
1982
, pp.
319
325
.
26.
Shi
T.
, and
Ramalingam
S.
, “
Slip-line Solution for Orthogonal Cutting with a Chip Breaker and Flank Wear
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
, Vol.
33
, No.
9
,
1991
, pp.
689
704
.
27.
Dewhurst
P.
, and
Collins
I. F.
, “
A Matrix Technique for Constructing Slip-line Field Solutions to a Class of Plane Strain Plasticity Problems
,”
Int. J. for Numerical Methods in Engineering
, Vol.
7
,
1973
, pp.
357
378
.
28.
Kudo
H.
, “
Some New Slip-line Solutions for Two-dimensional Steady-state Machining
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
, Vol.
7
,
1965
, pp.
43
55
.
29.
Oxley, P. L. B., The Mechanics of Machining: An Analytical Approach to Assessing Machinability, Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester, 1989.
30.
Black
J. T.
, “
Flow Stress Model in Metal Cutting
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY
, Vol.
101
, November,
1979
, pp.
403
415
.
31.
Shaw
M. C.
, and
Finnie
I.
, “
The Shear Stress in Metal Cutting
,”
Trans. ASME
, Vol.
77
,
1955
, p.
115
115
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.