Abstract

After an event involving the deliberate release of toxic chemicals, there is a need to collect samples at the affected site for preservation, recovery, and analysis of the chemical species of interest. These would likely include the active or toxic species as well as chemicals that could serve as chemical attribution signatures that would be important in assigning responsibility for the release. In this preliminary study, a standard gauze pad surface sampling material and technique was compared with the use of silicone rubber samplers placed on glass and coated steel solid surfaces. A range of commercially available silicone rubbers was examined for possible use and one was selected for more extensive evaluation due to its relative ease of handling and minimal interferences with the analytical process. The experiments were conducted with organic chemical species that covered a range of volatilities; two contaminant challenge concentrations were used. The silicone rubber samplers, as applied, were found to consistently collect higher quantities of organic chemicals from the solid surfaces than did the gauze pads. Results of these initial experiments are discussed and ongoing efforts are briefly described.

References

1.
Ehntholt
,
D. J.
, et al
Test Method Development and Evaluation of Protective Clothing Items Used in Agricultural Pesticide Operations
,”
Spec. Tech. Publ.
, No.
989
,
1988
, pp.
727
737
.
2.
Schwope
,
A. D.
,
Ehntholt
,
D.
, et al
, “
Permeation Resistance of Glove Materials to Agricultural Pesticides
,”
Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J.
, Vo.
53
, pp.
352
367
(June,
1992
) https://doi.org/10.1080/15298669291359771.
3.
Ding
,
J. J.-L.
, “
Sticky Silicone
,” Med. Des. Technol., March,
2008
, http://www.mdtmag.com/Articles/2008/03/sticky-silicone/ (Last accessed: 5/18/2012).
4.
Rusina
,
T. P.
,
Foppe
,
S.
,
Koblizkova
,
M.
, and
Klanova
,
I.
, “
Calibration of Silicone Rubber Passive Samplers: Experimental and Modeled Relations between Sampling Rate and Compound Properties
,”
Environ. Sci. Technol.
, Vol.
44
,
2010
, pp.
362
367
, and references therein. https://doi.org/10.1021/es900938r
5.
ASTM D6661-01
,
2006
, “
Standard Practice for Field Collection of Organic Compounds from Surfaces Using Wipe Sampling
,”
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
, Vol.
11.04
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
.
6.
National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Method 9100,
2003
, “
Lead in Surface Wipe Samples
,” NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, NIOSH Publication Number 2003-154 (3rd Supplement), National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Atlanta, GA.
7.
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, “
Chip, Wipe, and Sweep Sampling
,” E.R.T. SOP 2011,
1994
, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
8.
Drielak
,
S. C.
, “
Chemical Evidence Collection
,” Hot Zone Forensics, Chemical, Biological, and Radiological Evidence Collection, by Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL,
2004
.
9.
U. S. Army Regulation 70-71, Nuclear Biological and Chemical (NBC) Contamination Survivability of Army Material,” U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC,
1984
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.