Abstract

Fatigue-crack-growth-rate tests on compact specimens have been made on a variety of materials (2024-T3, 2324-T39, 7050-T7451, 4340 steel, and Inconel-718) over a wide range in stress ratios from 0.1 to 0.9 (and 0.95 in some cases) and several Kmax test conditions. Test data has been generated from threshold to near fracture using the compression precracking constant amplitude or compression precracking load reduction test methods in the threshold regime; and constant-amplitude loading at higher rates. A remote back-face strain (BFS) gage was used to monitor crack growth and to measure crack-opening loads. Local strain gages were also placed along and slightly off (about one-half thickness) the anticipated crack path to measure crack-opening loads. Elber’s load-against-reduced-strain method was used to determine crack-opening loads by means of visual inspection (equivalent to a 0 % compliance offset). For a particular material, the BFS and local strain gages produced essentially the same crack-opening loads at low stress ratio (R = 0.1) conditions. But at high stress ratios (R ≥ 0.7) and Kmax test conditions, the local gages produced significantly higher crack-opening loads than the BFS gage in the threshold and near-threshold regimes. Previous research had proposed that high stress ratios (R ≥ 0.7) and Kmax test conditions produce closure-free conditions based on crack-mouth-opening-displacement or BFS gages, and plasticity-induced crack-closure modeling. However, crack closure under high stress ratios (R ≥ 0.7) and Kmax test conditions is attributed to residual-plastic deformations, crack-surface roughness, and/or fretting-debris. From local crack-opening load measurements, the effective stress-intensity-factor range (ΔKeff) appears to be uniquely related to the crack-growth rate in the threshold and near-threshold regimes.

References

1.
Donald
,
K.
, “
User’s Reference Manual for Automated Fatigue Crack Growth (Compliance)
,” v. 2.65, Fracture Technology Associates, Bethlehem, PA,
2007
.
2.
Deans
,
W. F.
,
Jolly
,
C. B.
,
Poyton
,
W. A.
, and
Watson
,
W.
, “
A Strain Gauging Technique for Monitoring Fracture Mechanics Specimens During Environmental Testing
,”
J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des.
, Vol.
13
,
1977
, pp.
152
154
.
3.
Newman
,
J. C.
, Jr.
,
Vizzini
,
A. J.
, and
Yamada
,
Y.
,
2010
, “
Fatigue-Crack-Growth Databases and Analyses for Threshold Behavior in Rotorcraft Materials
,” DOT/FAA/AR-10/3, Dept. of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C.
4.
ASTM E-647
,
2008
, – “
Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates
,”
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
, Vol.
3.01
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
, pp.
1
45
.
5.
Newman
,
J. C.
, Jr.
, “
A Nonlinear Fracture Mechanics Approach to the Growth of Small Cracks
,”
Behaviour of Short Cracks in Airframe Components, AGARD Conf. Proc.
, Vol.
328
,
1983
, pp. 6.1–6.27.
6.
Newman
,
J. C.
, Jr.
, “
Analyses of Fatigue Crack Growth and Closure Near Threshold Conditions for Large-Crack Behavior
,”
ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ.
, Vol.
1372
,
2000
, pp.
227
251
.
7.
McClung
,
R. C.
, “
Analyses Of Fatigue Crack Closure During Simulated Threshold Testing
,”
ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ.
, Vol.
1372
,
2000
, pp.
35
43
.
8.
Suresh
,
S.
, “
Crack Initiation in Cyclic Compression and Its Application
,”
Eng. Fract.Mech.
, Vol.
21
,
1985
, pp.
453
463
. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(85)80038-2
9.
Pippan
,
R.
, “
The Growth of Short Cracks Under Cyclic Compression
,”
FatigueFract. Eng. Mater.Struct.
, Vol.
9
,
1987
, pp.
319
328
. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.1987.tb00459.x
10.
Yamada
,
Y.
,
Newman
,
J. C.
, III
, and
Newman
,
J. C.
, Jr.
, “
Elastic-Plastic Finite-Element Analyses of Compression Pre-Cracking and its Influence on Subsequent Fatigue Crack Growth
,”
J. ASTM Int
., Vol.
5
, No.
8
,
2008
, pp.
1
13
https://doi.org/10.1520/JAI101617.
11.
Elber
,
W.
, “
Crack Closure and Crack Growth Measurements in Surface-Flawed Titanium Alloy Ti-6Al-4V
,” NASA-TN-D-8010, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C.,
1975
.
12.
Saxena
,
A.
,
Hudak
,
S. J.
, Jr.
,
Donald
,
J. K.
, and
Schmidt
,
D. W.
, “
Computer-Controlled Decreasing Stress Intensity Technique for Low Rate Fatigue Crack Growth Testing
,”
J. Test. Eval.
, Vol.
6
, No.
3
,
1978
, pp.
167
174
. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE10938J
13.
Smith
,
S. W.
and
Piascik
,
R. S.
, “
Determining Closure Free Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior in the Near Threshold Regime
,”
ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ.
, Vol.
1372
,
2000
, pp.
109
122
.
14.
Lang
,
M.
, “
Explanation of an Apparent Abnormality In Fatigue Crack Growth Curves in Titanium Alloys
,”
Acta Mater.
, Vol.
47
,
1999
, pp.
3247
3261
. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00181-0
15.
Schmidt
,
R. A.
and
Paris
,
P. C.
, “
Threshold for Fatigue Crack Propagation and the Effect of Load Ratio and Frequency
,”
ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ.
, Vol.
536
, pp.
79
94
.
16.
Elber
,
W.
, “
The Significance of Fatigue Crack Closure
,”
ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ.
, Vol.
486
,
1971
, pp.
230
242
.
17.
Paris
,
P. C.
,
Tada
,
H.
, and
Donald
,
J. K.
, “
Service Load Fatigue Damage – a Historical Perspective
,”
International Journal of Fatigue
, Vol.
21
,
1999
, pp.
S35
S46
. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-1123(99)00054-7
18.
Walker
,
N.
and
Beevers
,
C. J.
, “
A Fatigue Crack Closure Mechanism in Titanium
,”
Fatigue Fract. Eng.Mater. Struct.
, Vol.
1
,
1979
, pp.
135
148
. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.1979.tb00372.x
19.
Endo
,
K.
,
Komai
,
K.
, and
Matasuda
,
Y.
, “
Mechanical Effects of Corrosion Products in Corrosion Fatigue Crack Growth of a Steel
,”
Bull. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng.
, Vol.
24
,
1981
, pp.
1319
1325
.
20.
Bray
,
H. G.
and
Donald
,
J. K.
, “
Separating the Influence of Kmax from Closure-Related Stress Ratio Effects Using the Adjusted Compliance Ratio Technique
,”
ASTM Spec. Tech.Publ.
, Vol.
1343
,
1999
, p.
57
78
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.