Abstract

A large-scale recycling and reuse application of scrap shingles would utilize an otherwise wasted resource while clearing landfill space and creating new business opportunities. One potential reuse application is the use of reclaimed asphalt shingles (RAS) as an additive or substitute for the earth materials typically used in the aggregate base (AB) and subbase (ASB) layers of roadway pavements. The purpose of this study was to determine the technical specifications of RAS, the effect of fly ash stabilization on RAS strength, and the practicality of the widespread implementation of RAS in the AB and ASB layers of roadway pavements. RAS, fly ash stabilized RAS (S-RAS), RAS-aggregate mixtures, and RAS-silt mixtures were evaluated for particle size characteristics, compaction characteristics, CA Bearing Ratio (CBR), unconfined compressive strength, and resilient modulus. According to the results of the testing protocol, unstabilized RAS is unsuitable as base material although RAS could potentially be used as subbase or general fill material. RAS-aggregate mixtures are suitable for use as subbase and are potentially suitable as base course in an unstabilized state; however, RAS-aggregate mixtures exhibited decreasing resilient modulus with increasing RAS content. Fly ash stabilized RAS (S-RAS) was less susceptible to penetrative deformation than unstabilized RAS, however, S-RAS was still highly susceptible to penetrative deformation when unpaved. Fly ash stabilization of RAS generally provided less improvement in resilient modulus compared to fly ash stabilized low-plasticity clays. This may be due to the high asphalt content of RAS particles and resulting diminishment in pozzolanic activity and/or the diminished particle interconnectedness for cementation. Other forms of stabilization, such as cold asphalt emulsion, may be more effective in strengthening RAS. Further evaluation of alternative stabilization methods and additional studies to evaluate the practicality of RAS in other geotechnical applications such as embankment fill, filter, and/or drainage material are recommended.

References

1.
Shingle Recycling Organization, “
From Roofs to Roads: Recycled Asphalt Roofing Shingles into Paving Materials
,”
Information and Guidance Brochure
, www.shinglerecycling.org (Last accessed September 1,
2006
).
2.
Cascadia Consulting Group, “
Wisconsin Statewide Characterization Study
,” Final Report,
2003
.
3.
Crivit
,
D.
, “
Overcoming the Barriers to Asphalt Shingle Recycling: Final Report for the RMRC Project 22
,”
Final Report, Research Project RMRC 22
,
MN Department of Transportation
,
MN
,
2005
.
4.
Marks
,
V.
, and
Petermier
,
G.
, “
Let Me Shingle Your Roadway
,”
Interim Report, Research Project HR-2079
,
IA Department of Transportation
,
IA
,
1997
.
5.
Hooper
,
F.
and
Marr
,
W.
, “
Effects of Reclaimed Asphalt Shingles on Engineering Properties of Soils
,”
Recycled Materials in Geotechnics, ASCE Civil Engineering Conference and Exposition
, Oct,
2004
, pp.
137
149
.
6.
ASTM C618
,
2008
, “
Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete
,”
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
, Vol.
04.02
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
, pp.
1
3
.
7.
Edil
,
T.
,
Acosta
,
H.
, and
Benson
,
C.
, “
Stabilizing Soft Fine-Grained Soils with Fly Ash
,”
J. Mater. Civil Eng.
,
Vol.
March,
2006
, pp.
283
295
. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:2(283)
8.
ASTM D422
,
1963
, “
Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils
,”
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
, Vol.
04.08
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
, pp.
1
8
(Reapproved
2007
).
9.
ASTM D2487
,
2006
, “
Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System)
,”
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
, Vol.
04.08
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
, pp.
1
11
.
10.
ASTM D4791
,
2005
, “
Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate
,”
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
, Vol.
04.03
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
, pp.
1
4
.
11.
ASTM D698
,
2000
, “
Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort
,”
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
, Vol.
04.08
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
, pp.
1
11
.
12.
Holtz
,
R.
and
Kovacs
,
W.
,
Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering
,
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
,
1981
.
13.
ASTM D1883
,
2005
, “
Standard Test Method for CBR (California Bearing Ratio) of Laboratory-Compacted Soils
,”
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
, Vol.
04.08
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
, pp.
1
8
.
14.
NCHRP Project 1-28 A, 2004, “
Laboratory Determination of Resilient Modulus for Flexible Pavement Design
,”
National Cooperative Highway Research Program
, Jan,
2004
.
15.
Andrei
,
D.
,
Witczak
,
M.
,
Schwartz
,
C.
, and
Uzan
,
J.
, “
Harmonized Resilient Modulus Test Method for Unbound Pavement Materials
,” Transportation Research Record. 1874,
2004
, pp.
29
37
. https://doi.org/10.3141/1874-04
16.
NCHRP Project 1-37 A, “
Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design on New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures
,”
National Cooperative Highway Research Program
, March,
2004
.
17.
Senol
,
A.
,
Bin-Shafique
,
S.
,
Edil
,
T.
, and
Benson
,
C.
, “
Use of Class C Fly Ash for Stabilization of Soft Subgrade
,”
Fifth International Conference on Advances in Civil Engineering
,
Istanbul
,
Turkey
, Sept,
2002
.
18.
Edil
,
T.
and
Bosscher
,
P.
, “
Engineering Properties of Tire Chips and Soil Mixtures
,”
Geotech. Test. J.
, Vol.
17
, No.
4
,
1994
, pp.
453
464
. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10306J
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.