Abstract

The objective of this work is to evaluate a proposed test plan for the validation testing of pesticide spray drift reduction technologies (DRTs) for row and field crops, focusing on the testing of ground and aerial application systems under full-scale field evaluations. The measure of performance for a given DRT tested under field conditions is the downwind deposition as measured on horizontal fallout collectors. Ground and aerial application equipment were evaluated for in-swath and downwind deposition of sprays as applied by both a reference system and a drift reducing technology. For this study, the reference system was defined as a spray boom outfitted with the ASABE Fine/Medium boundary reference nozzles. For the ground system, the drift reducing system tested was a ground sprayer outfitted with an air-induction version of the reference nozzle. The aerial system DRT was a flat fan nozzle specifically designed for aerial application usage. Downwind deposition was measured from the edge of the swath out to 100 m downwind. Additionally, the airborne portion of the spray remaining suspended in the air at 50 m downwind was measured. There were a number of confounding issues with the measured data including poor recovery of deposits and non-ideal wind directions during specific replications. Even with these issues, the drift reduction between the reference and DRT system measured in the field for the aerial trials was similar to that estimated using the agricultural dispersion model. A number of additional improvements and checks are suggested prior to further field evaluations.

References

1.
EPA
, Pesticide Registration (PR) Notice 2001-x draft: Spray and Dust Drift Label Statements for Pesticide Products, http://www.epa.gov/PR_Notices/prdraft-spraydrift801.htm (Last accessed November 15,
2010
).
2.
Hoffmann
,
W. C.
and
Kirk
,
I. W.
, “
Spray Deposition and Drift from Two “Medium” Nozzles
,”
Trans. ASAE
 0001-2351, Vol.
48
(
1
),
2005
, pp.
5
11
.
3.
Kirk
,
I. W.
, “
Aerial Spray Drift from Different Formulations of Glyphosate
,”
Trans. ASAE
 0001-2351, Vol.
43
(
3
),
2000
, pp.
555
559
.
4.
Draper
,
W. M.
and
Street
,
J. C.
, “
Drift from a Commercial, Aerial Application of Methyl and Ethyl Parathion: An Estimation of Potential Human Exposure
,”
Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.
 0007-4861, Vol.
26
(
1
),
1981
, pp.
530
536
. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01622132
5.
Pimentel
,
D.
, “
Amounts of Pesticides Reaching Target Pests: Environmental Impacts and Ethics
,”
J. Agric. Envir. Ethics
 0893-4282, Vol.
8
(
1
),
1995
, pp.
17
29
. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02286399
6.
Franz
,
E.
,
Bouse
,
L. F.
,
Carlton
,
J. B.
,
Kirk
,
I. W.
, and
Latheef
,
M. A.
, “
Aerial Spray Deposit Relations with Plant Canopy and Weather Parameters
,”
Trans. ASAE
 0001-2351, Vol.
41
(
4
),
1998
, pp.
959
966
.
7.
Nordby
,
A.
and
Skuterud
,
R.
, “
The Effects of Boom Height, Working Pressure and Wind Speed on Spray Drift
,”
Weed Res.
 0043-1737, Vol.
14
(
6
),
1974
, pp.
385
395
. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01080.x
8.
Yates
,
W. E.
,
Akesson
,
N. B.
, and
Cowden
,
R. E.
, “
Criteria for Minimizing Drift Residues on Crops Downwind from Aerial Applications
,”
Trans. ASAE
 0001-2351, Vol.
17
(
4
),
1974
, pp.
627
632
.
9.
Hewitt
,
A. J.
, “
Spray Drift: Impact of Requirements to Protect the Environment
,”
Crop Protection
, Vol.
19
(
8–10
),
2000
, pp.
623
627
. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(00)00082-X
10.
Sayles
,
G.
,
Birchfield
,
N.
, and
Ellenberger
,
J.
, “
US EPA’s Research Proposal for Encouraging the Use of Spray Drift Reduction Technologies
,”
Proc. Int. Conf. on Pesticide Application for Drift Management
, Waikoloa, HI,
2004
,
U.S. EPA
,
Washington, D.C.
, pp.
204
209
, http://pep.wsu.edu/drift04/proceedings.html.
11.
Kosusko
,
M.
,
Bullock
,
K.
,
Birchfield
,
N.
, and
Hewitt
,
A.
, “
Development of a Test Plan to Verify Pesticide Drift Reduction Technologies
,”
Proc. ASABE
, Portland, OR,
2006
,
American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers
,
St. Joseph, MI
.
12.
EPA
, Pesticide Spray Drift Reduction Technologies: Verification and Incentives for Use, http://www.epa.gov/etop/forum/problem/progressreports/pest-spray-9-15-06.html (Last accessed October 10,
2010
).
13.
EPA
, “
Draft Generic Verification Protocol for the Verification of Pesticide Spray Drift Reduction Technologies for Row and Field Crops
,” Report No. EPA/600/R-07/102, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.,
2007
.
14.
Fritz
,
B. K.
,
Hoffmann
,
W. C.
, and
Lan
,
Y.
, “
Evaluation of the EPA Drift Reduction Technology (DRT) Low Speed Wind Tunnel Protocol
,”
J. ASTM Int.
 1546-962X, Vol.
6
(
4
),
2009
, Paper ID: JAI102129. https://doi.org/10.1520/JAI102129
15.
Fritz
,
B. K.
,
Hoffmann
,
W. C.
,
Birchfield
,
N. B.
,
Ellenberger
,
J.
,
Khan
,
F.
,
Bagley
,
W. E.
,
Thornburg
,
J. W.
, and
Hewitt
,
A. J.
, “
Evaluation of Spray Drift Using Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Measurements and Dispersion Modeling
,”
J. ASTM Int.
 1546-962X, Vol.
7
(
6
),
2010
, Paper ID: JAI102775. https://doi.org/10.1520/JAI102775
16.
Hoffmann
,
W. C.
,
Fritz
,
B. K.
, and
Lan
,
Y.
, “
Evaluation of a Proposed Drift Reduction Technology (DRT) High-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing Protocol
,”
J. ASTM Int.
 1546-962X, Vol.
6
(
4
),
2009
, Paper ID: JAI102122. https://doi.org/10.1520/JAI102122
17.
Hoffmann
,
W. C.
,
Fritz
,
B. K.
,
Thornburg
,
J. W.
,
Bagley
,
W. E.
,
Birchfield
,
N. B.
, and
Ellenberger
,
J.
, “
Spray Drift Reduction Evaluations of Spray Nozzles Using Standardized Testing Protocol
,”
J. ASTM Int.
 1546-962X, Vol.
7
(
8
),
2010
, Paper ID: JAI102820. https://doi.org/10.1520/JAI102820
18.
ASABE S561.1,
2009
, “
Procedure for Measuring Drift Deposits from Ground, Orchard, and Aerial Sprayers
,” American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI.
19.
Bilanin
,
A. J.
,
Teske
,
M. E.
,
Barry
,
J. W.
, and
Eckblad
,
R. B.
, “
AGDISP: The Aircraft Spray Dispersion Model, Code Development and Experimental Validation
,”
Trans. ASAE
 0001-2351, Vol.
32
(
1
),
1989
, pp.
327
334
.
20.
Teske
,
M. E.
,
Thistle
,
H. W.
, and
Ice
,
G. G.
, “
Technical Advances in Modeling Aerially Applied Sprays
,”
Trans. ASAE
 0001-2351, Vol.
46
(
4
),
2003
, pp.
985
996
.
21.
Teske
,
M. E.
and
Thistle
,
H. W.
, “
A Simulation of Release Height and Wind Speed Effects for Drift Minimization
,”
Trans. ASAE
 0001-2351, Vol.
42
(
3
),
1999
, pp.
583
591
.
22.
ASTM E1260-03,
2009
, “
Standard Test Method for Determining Liquid Drop Size Characteristics in a Spray Using Optical Nonimaging Light-Scattering Instruments
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol.
14.02
, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
23.
Fritz
,
B. K.
, “
Meteorological Effects on Deposition and Drift of Aerially Applied Sprays
,”
Trans. ASABE
 0001-2351, Vol.
49
,
2006
, pp.
1295
1301
.
24.
Fritz
,
B. K.
and
Hoffmann
,
W. C.
, “
Atmospheric Effects on the Fate of Aerially Applied Agricultural Sprays
,”
Agric. Eng. Int
, Vol.
10
,
2008
, pp.
1
15
.
25.
Boxall
,
A. B. A.
,
Hardy
,
A.
,
Beulke
,
S.
,
Boucard
,
T.
,
Burgin
,
L.
,
Falloon
,
P. D.
,
Haygarth
,
P. M.
,
Hutchinson
,
T.
,
Kovats
,
R. S.
,
Leonardi
,
G.
,
Levy
,
L. S.
,
Nichols
,
G.
,
Parsons
,
S. A.
,
Potts
,
L.
,
Stone
,
D.
,
Topp
,
E.
,
Turley
,
D. B.
,
Walsh
,
K.
,
Wellington
,
E. M. H.
, and
Williams
,
R. J.
, “
Impact of Climate Change on Indirect Human Exposure to Pathogens and Chemicals from Agriculture
,”
Environ. Health Perspect.
 0091-6765, Vol.
117
(
4
),
2009
, pp.
508
514
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.