Abstract

The activities and the policies issued by the Hydrostatic Stress Board (HSB) of the Plastics Pipe Institute have significantly enhanced the reliability of pressure rated thermoplastics pipe and the quality of ASTM, American Water Works Association, and other standards that cover such pipes. HSB policies define procedures for the forecasting of the long-term hydrostatic strength of thermoplastics piping materials and for the reducing of this strength into a hydrostatic design stress (HDS). HSB policies have been developed and are periodically updated under the light of our most current understanding of the factors that affect significant strength under actual service conditions. In support of the development of the most appropriate policies the HSB has also conducted various investigative activities. This paper reports on the major contributions that have been made by the HSB. Furthermore, it does so with reference to an overview of the factors that are now recognized as affecting the significant strength under actual service conditions and those that need to be considered when reducing a particular measure of strength into the most appropriate value of a HDS for an intended application.

References

1.
ASTM D1598, “
Time-to-Failure of Plastic Pipe Under Constant Internal Pressure
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol.
08.04
, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
2.
ASTM D1599, “
Short-Time Hydraulic Failure Pressure of Plastic Pipe, Tubing and Fittings
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol.
08.04
, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
3.
ASA ZS17.1-
1958
, , “
Preffered Numbers
,” The American National Standards Institute, New York.
4.
ASTM D2837, “
Short-Time Hydraulic Failure Pressure of Plastic Pipe, Tubing and Fittings
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol.
08.04
, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
5.
Palermo
,
G.
, “
Using the CRS Concept for Plastic Pipe Design Applications
,”
Plastic Pipes XIII
, Washington, D.C.,
2006
.
6.
ASTM F412, “
Standard Terminology Relating to Plastic Piping Systems
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol.
08.04
, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
7.
Boros
,
S.
, “
Development of an Accelerated Slow Crack Growth (SCG) Test Method for Polyethylene (PE) Pipe and Correlation with Hydrostatic Stress Rupture Test Method ASTM D 1598
,”
Plastic Pipes XIII
, Washington, DC, October 2–5, 2006,
2006
.
8.
ASTM F1473, “
Standard Test Method for Notch Tensile Test to Measure the Resistance to Slow Crack Growth of Polyethylene Pipe and Resins
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol.
08.04
, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
9.
Marshall
,
G. P.
,
Harry
,
P. G.
,
Ward
,
A. L.
, and
Pearson
,
D.
, “
The Prediction of Long Term Failure Properties of Plastic Pressure Pipes
,” Report Submitted to the North West Water Utility by Pipeline Developments Limited, Manchester, England,
1992
.
10.
Davis
,
P.
,
Burn
,
S.
,
Gould
,
S.
,
Cardy
,
M.
,
Tjandraatmadja
,
G.
, and
Sadler
,
P.
, “
Long-Term Performance Prediction for PE Pipes
,” Report No. 91194, American Water Works Association and AWWA Research Foundation,
2008
.
11.
J.
Hessel
, “
Minimum Service-Life of Buried Polyethylene Pipes Without Sand-Embedding
,”
3R International 40
,
2001
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.