Abstract

The multiple-specimen method (low-blow or stop-block tests) is the conventional approach for measuring the upper shelf fracture toughness of steels under impact loading rates, using fatigue precracked Charpy (PCC) specimens tested with an instrumented pendulum machine. The method is fairly simple but requires a relatively large number of specimens. As an alternative, the single-specimen method denominated normalization data reduction (NDR) is based on the analysis of the instrumented force/displacement trace and does not need dedicated instrumentation for the measurement of crack extension during the test. In this study, the NDR technique was applied to low-blow tests performed at different temperatures on two reactor pressure vessel (RPV) steels, 20MnMoNi55 and A553B Cl. 1. Analyses were performed after applying a double fitting approach to the raw test data, which allows selecting a limited set of force/displacement data which are representative of the whole instrumented trace. Results show that the NDR technique provides acceptable accuracy in terms of both ductile crack initiation and resistance to crack propagation (tearing modulus).

References

1.
ASTM E1820-09, “Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness,” ASTM Book of Standards, Vol. 03.01.
2.
H.
Ernst
,
P. C.
Paris
,
M.
Rossow
, and
J. W.
Hutchinson
, “
Analysis of Load-Displacement Relationship to Determine J-R Curve and Tearing Instability Material Properties
,”
Fracture Mechanics, ASTM STP 677
,
C.W.
Smith
, Ed.,
ASTM International
,
Conshohocken, PA
,
1979
, pp.
581
599
.
3.
Herrera
,
R.
, and
Landes
,
J. D.
, “
Direct J-R Curve Analysis: A Guide to the Methodology
,”
Fracture Mechanics: Twenty-First Symposium, ASTM STP 1074
,
J. P.
Gudas
,
J. A.
Joyce
, and
E. M.
Hackett
, Eds.,
ASTM International
,
Conshohocken, PA
,
1990
, pp.
24
43
.
4.
Landes
,
J. D.
,
Zhou
,
Z.
,
Lee
,
K.
, and
Herrera
,
R.
, “
Normalization Method for Developing J-R Curves with the LMN Function
,”
J. Test. Eval.
, Vol.
19
, No.
4
,
1991
, pp.
305
311
. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE12574J
5.
Baldi
,
F.
and
Riccò
T.
, “
Applicability of the Load Separation Criterion and the Normalization Method to High-Rate J-Testing of Ductile Polymers
,”
Atti Convegno IGF XVII Bologna 2004, Italian Group on Fracture
,
Bologna
,
Italy
, May 9,
2004
.
6.
Brown
,
E. N.
, “
Application of the normalization JIc fracture methodology to a range of ductile polymers
,” Paper 275,
Proceedings of the SEM 2007 Annual Conference and Exposition
,
Springfield
,
MA
, June 4–6,
2007
.
7.
Salazar
,
A.
,
Garrido
,
M. A.
,
Rodríguez
,
J.
, and
Martínez
,
A. B.
, “
Determination of the J-R Curves of Ethylene-Propylene Block Copolymers by means of Different J-Integral Methodologies
,”
An. Mec. Fract.
, Vol.
27
, No.
2
,
2010
, pp.
673
678
.
8.
Bernal
,
C. R.
,
Montemartini
,
P. E.
, and
Frontini
,
P. M.
, “
The use of load separation criterion and normalization method in ductile fracture characterization of thermoplastic polymers
,”
J. Polym. Sci. Part B: Polym. Phys.
, Vol.
34
, No.
11
,
1996
, pp.
1869
1880
. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(199608)34:11<>1.0.CO;2-M
9.
Che
,
M.
,
Grellmann
,
W.
,
Seidler
,
S.
, and
Landes
,
J. D.
, “
Application of a Normalization Method for Determining J-R Curve in Glassy Polymer PVC at Different Crosshead Speeds
,”
Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct.
, Vol.
20
, No.
2
,
1997
, pp.
119
127
. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.1997.tb00272.x
10.
Joyce
,
J. A.
, “
Analysis of the E08.02 High Rate Round Robin
,”
J. Test. Eval.
, Vol.
29
, No.
4
,
2001
, pp.
329
351
. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE12262J
11.
Džugan
,
J.
, and
Viehrig
,
H.-W.
, “
Application of the normalization method for the determination of J-R curves
,”
Mater. Sci. Eng. A
, Vol.
387–389
,
2004
, pp.
307
311
.
12.
Graham
,
S. M.
, “
Application of the Normalization Method to Dynamic Fracture Toughness Testing of Alloy 718
,”
J. ASTM Int.
, Vol.
3
, No.
6
,
2006
.
13.
Zhu
,
X. K.
,
Lam
,
P. S.
, and
Chao
,
Y. J.
, “
Application of Normalization Method to Fracture Resistance Testing for Storage Tank A285 Carbon Steel
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
, Vol.
86
, No.
10
,
2009
, pp.
669
676
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2009.03.009
14.
Candra
,
H.
,
Wright
,
W. J.
, and
Albrecht
,
P.
, “
Experimentally determined key curves for fracture specimens
,”
Int. J. Fract.
, Vol.
117
, No.
3
,
2002
, pp.
247
267
. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022007616892
15.
Graham
,
S. M.
, and
Stiles
,
D.
, “
An Enhanced Normalization Method for Dynamic Fracture Toughness Testing
,”
Proceedings of the 16th European Conference of Fracture, Failure Analysis of Nano and Engineering Materials and Structures
,
E. E.
Gdoutos
, Ed.,
Alexandroupolis
,
Greece
, July 3–7,
2006
.
16.
Herrera
,
R.
,
Carcagno
,
G.
, and
de Vedia
,
L.
, “
Evaluation of Dynamic Fracture Toughness Using the Normalization Method
,”
Fracture Mechanics: Twenty-Third Symposium
,
R.
Chona
, Ed.,
ASTM
,
Conshohocken, PA
,
1993
, pp.
168
184
.
17.
EPRI NP-2102-LD
,
1981
,
C.S.N.I Specialist Meeting on Instrumented Precracked Charpy Testing
,
Electric Power Research Institute
,
Palo Alto, CA
.
18.
ESIS P2-92
,
1992
, “
ESIS Procedure for Determining the Fracture Behaviour of Materials
”, European Structural Integrity Society.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.