Abstract

Releasable ski bindings have helped to reduce the risk of lower leg injury but have not been effective in abating the risk of injury to the knee’s anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). The authors theorized that if binding retention requirements were better understood, bindings could be developed that would eliminate excess retention under conditions associated with known mechanisms of injury, while providing an appropriate margin of retention during controlled skiing maneuvers. Currently, release/retention requirements for Alpine bindings are defined simply by a moment (couple). But the moment sensed by a skier’s leg at release is dependent on not only the release moment to which the binding has been adjusted also but by where on the ski the load is applied. During the Winter of 2006–2007, the authors developed the instrumentation, protocols, and methods of data reduction and analysis necessary to express retention requirements of Alpine skiers in terms of load and load position on a virtual ski of infinite length. During the Winter of 2007–2008, 15 experienced skiers were fitted with a pair of skis in which one ski was equipped with a platform for measuring forces transverse to the long axis of the ski boot in a plane parallel to the bottom of the sole. Each subject in the study performed a series of skiing, recovery, and climbing maneuvers. Video and audio records of those maneuvers were synchronized with the 90 min of recorded data, allowing the data to be classified by skiing activity and reduced to a force and moment resolved about an axis approximating the skier’s tibia. The force was then divided into the moment resulting in the position (lever arm) of the force necessary to produce the moment. Using current standards, the moment was scaled as a percentage of the recommended release moment. Loads applied to the inside edge of the rear body of the ski, an area commonly associated with ACL injuries, were rarely found to be both more than 45 cm from the tibia and more than 40 % of the recommended. The few events in this “zone of ACL vulnerability” were associated with loss of control while skiing backward at low speed. From these observations, a release simulating platform was developed, which isolated the binding from the ski. The platform sounded an alarm if the moment sensed by the simulator exceeded 50 % of the recommended release moment and the load was applied in the “zone of vulnerability.” In more than 120 min of skiing, the alarm never sounded, indicating that no inadvertent release would have taken place if the simulator had been an active release binding. However, subjects were able to initiate the alarm, thus simulating a release, by attempting to twist out of the binding with only the tail end of the ski engaged with the snow surface. The authors believe that the database and analytical techniques developed in this study may help to optimize the overall release/retention capabilities of future bindings.

References

1.
Johnson
,
R. J.
,
Ettlinger
,
C. F.
, and
Shealy
,
J. E.
, “
Update on Injury Trends in Alpine Skiing
,”
Skiing Trauma and Safety: 17th Volume, ASTM STP 1510
,
R. J.
Johnson
,
J. E.
Shealy
, and
M.
Langran
, Eds.,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2009
, pp.
11
22
. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP47461S
2.
Ettlinger
,
C. F.
,
Johnson
,
R. J.
, and
Shealy
,
J. E.
, “
A Method to Help Reduce the Risk of Serious Knee Sprains Incurred in Alpine Skiing
,”
Am. J. Sports Med.
 0363-5465, Vol.
23
,
1995
, pp.
531
537
. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659502300503
3.
Johnson
,
R. J.
,
Shealy
,
J. E.
, and
Ettlinger
,
C. F.
, “
Injury Trends and Risk Factors Involving ACL Injuries in Alpine Skiing
,” presented at the
16th International Symposium on Ski Trauma and Skiing Safety
, Arai Mountain, Niigata, Japan, April 17–23,
2005
.
4.
Shealy
,
J. E.
,
Ettlinger
,
C. F.
, and
Johnson
,
R. J.
, “
A Two Year Study of Skiboards
,”
Skiing Trauma and Safety: 13th Volume, ASTM STP 1397
,
R. J.
Johnson
,
P.
Zucco
, and
J. E.
Shealy
, Eds.,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2000
, pp.
127
131
.
5.
Johnson
,
R. J.
,
Ettlinger
,
C. F.
, and
Shealy
,
J. E.
, “
Lower Extremity Injuries Involving Traditional Alpine Skis Versus Short Skis with Non-Release Bindings
,”
Skiing Trauma and Safety: 14th Volume, ASTM STP 1440
,
R. J.
Johnson
,
M.
Lamont
, and
J. E.
Shealy
, Eds.,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2003
, pp.
105
112
.
6.
Ettlinger
,
C. F.
,
Johnson
,
R. J.
, and
Shealy
,
J. E.
, “
Functional and Release Characteristics of Alpine Ski Equipment
,”
Skiing Trauma and Safety: 16th Volume, ASTM STP 1474
,
2006
,
J. E.
Shealy
and
T.
Yamagishi
, Eds.,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
, pp.
65
74
.
7.
Shealy
,
J. E.
,
Ettlinger
,
C. F.
, and
Johnson
,
R. J.
, “
What Do We Know?
,”
Skiing Trauma and Safety: 14th Volume, ASTM STP 1440
,
R. J.
Johnson
,
M.
Lamont
, and
J. E.
Shealy
, Eds.,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2003
, pp.
36
52
.
8.
Ettlinger
,
C. F.
,
Johnson
,
R. J.
, and
Shealy
,
J. E.
, “
Where Do We Go from Here?
,”
Skiing Trauma and Safety: 14th Volume, ASTM STP 1440
,
R. J.
Johnson
,
M.
Lamont
, and
J. E.
Shealy
, Eds.,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2003
, pp.
53
63
.
9.
ASTM F939-06,
2009
, “
Standard Practice for Selection of Release Torque Values for Alpine Ski Bindings
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol.
15
, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, pp.
133
-
138
.
10.
Ettlinger
,
C. F.
and
Bahniuk
,
E.
, “
Method for Testing and Analysis of Alpine Ski Bindings
,”
J. Safety Res.
 0022-4375, Vol.
12
,
1980
, pp.
4
12
.
11.
ASTM F504-05,
2009
, “
Standard Test Method for Measuring the Quasi-Static Release Moments of Alpine Ski Bindings
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol.
15
, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, pp.
29
-
40
.
12.
Outwater
,
J. O.
and
Woodard
,
M. S.
, “
Skiing Forces and Fractures
,”
Mech. Eng. (Am. Soc. Mech. Eng.)
 0025-6501, Vol.
89
,
1967
, pp.
25
30
.
13.
Lieu
,
D.
,
Mote
,
C. D.
,
Brown
,
C. A.
, and
Ettlinger
,
C. F.
, “
Ski Binding Function in Recreational and Competitive Skiing
,”
Ski Trauma and Skiing Safety IV
, publication series of
TUV-Edition
,
Munich
,
1982
, pp.
136
152
.
14.
Crawford
,
R. P.
and
Mote
,
C. D.
, Jr.
, “
Ski Binding Minimum Retention Requirements
,”
Skiing Trauma and Safety: 11th Volume, ASTM STP 1289
,
R. J.
Johnson
,
C. D.
Mote
., Jr.
, and
A.
Ekeland
, Eds.,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
1997
, pp.
93
108
.
15.
Scher
,
I. S.
and
Mote
,
C. D.
, Jr.
, “
Minimum Retention Settings: Examining Prediction Methods
,”
Skiing Trauma and Safety: 13th Volume, ASTM STP 1397
,
R. J.
Johnson
,
P.
Zucco
, and
J. E.
Shealy
, eds.,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2000
, pp.
11
29
.
16.
Shealy
,
J. E.
and
Ettlinger
,
C. F.
, “
An Investigation of Ski Binding Settings Based upon Minimum Retention Requirements
,”
Ski Trauma and Skiing Safety IV
, publication series of
TUV-Edition
,
Munich
,
1982
, pp.
113
121
.
17.
Shealy
,
J. E.
,
Ettlinger
,
C. F.
, and
Johnson
,
R. J.
, “
Signal Detection Theory: A Model for Evaluating Release/Retention Criteria in Alpine Ski-Binding-Boot Systems
,”
Skiing Trauma and Safety: 12th Edition, ASTM STP 1345
,
R. J.
Johnson
, Ed.,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
1999
, pp.
120
131
.
18.
Shealy
,
J. E.
,
Ettlinger
,
C. F.
, and
Johnson
,
R. J.
, “
Using Signal Detection Theory as a Model to Evaluate Release/Retention Criteria in Alpine Skiing
,”
J. ASTM Int.
 1546-962X, Vol.
2
(
7
),
2005
, pp.
1
12
. https://doi.org/10.1520/JAI12938
19.
ISO 9462,
2006
, “
Alpine Ski Binding—Safety Requirements and Test Methods
,” International Organization for Standards (ISO), available from American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 25 W. 43rd St., 4th Floor, New York, NY.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.