Abstract

A series of 12 cruciform geometry fracture toughness specimens has recently been tested using A533B base plate obtained from the decommissioned Shoreham plant pressure vessel. Specimens were tested at −100°C, placing them in the lower ductile to brittle transition of this ferritic structural steel. The overall objective of this work is to compare the results of these biaxial cruciform tests to the results of standard and shallow crack fracture toughness tests to assess the effect of biaxial loading on the measured master curve and the To reference temperature as defined by ASTM E 1921. Previous work done at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) appeared to demonstrate an increase in the To reference temperature due to the presence of the biaxial stress field established in the cruciform test geometry. Because of the cost of the ORNL tests, only a few specimens could be run, and full statistical support of the “biaxial effect” could not be demonstrated. A second goal is to demonstrate that smaller size specimens, and hence lower cost tests, can be used to evaluate the magnitude of the biaxial effect in nuclear reactor pressure vessel materials. This report presents a brief overview of the test procedure, presents the test results, and compares the results to the database available on standard and shallow crack fracture toughness results available for the Shoreham plate material.

References

1.
Wallin
,
K.
,
Saario
,
T.
, and
Torronen
,
K.
, “
Statistical Model for Carbide Induced Brittle Fracture in Steel
,”
Metal Science
 0306-3453 https://doi.org/10.1016/0036-9748(84)90081-4, Vol.
18
,
1984
, pp.
13
-
16
.
2.
Wallin
,
K.
, “
The Scatter in K1c Results
,”
Engineering Fracture Mechanics
 0013-7944 https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(84)90153-X, Vol.
19
,
1984
, pp.
1085
-
1093
.
3.
Wallin
,
K.
, “
Optimized Estimation of the Weibull Distribution Parameters
,” Research Report 604,
Technical Research Center of Finland
, Espoo, Finland,
1989
.
4.
Merkle
,
J. G.
,
Wallin
,
K.
,
McCabe
,
D. E.
, “
Technical Basis for an ASTM Standard for Determining the Reference Temperature, To, for Ferritic Steels in the Transition Range
,” NUREG/CR-5504,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
,
1998
.
5.
Bass
,
B. R.
,
Bryson
,
J. W.
,
Theiss
,
T. J.
, and
Rao
,
M. C.
, “
Biaxial Loading and Shallow-Flaw Effects on Crack-Tip Constraint and Fracture Toughness
,”
USNRC Report, ORNL
, NUREG/CR-6132, (ORNL/TM-12498),
1994
.
6.
Bass
,
B. R.
,
McAfee
,
W. J.
,
Williams
,
P. T.
, and
Pennell
,
W. E.
, “
Fracture Assessment of Shallow-Flaw Cruciform Beams Tested under Uniaxial and Biaxial Loading Conditions
,”
Nuclear Engineering and Design
 0029-5493 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(99)00035-7, Vol.
188
, No.
3
,
1999
, pp.
259
-
288
.
7.
Link
,
R. E.
and
Joyce
,
J. A.
, “
Experimental Investigation of Fracture Toughness Scaling Models
,”
Constraint Effects in Fracture Theory and Applications
, ASTM STP 1244,
Mark
Kirk
and
Ad
Bakker
, Eds.,
1995
, pp.
286
-
315
.
8.
Nevalainen
,
M.
and
Dodds
,
R. H.
, Jr.
, “
Numerical Investigation of 3-D Constraint Effects on Brittle Fracture in SE(B) and C(T) Specimens
,”
International Journal of Fracture
, Vol.
74
,
1995
, pp.
131
-
161
.
9.
Betegon
,
C.
and
Hancock
,
J. W.
, “
Two Parameter Characterization of Elastic-Plastic Crack Tip Fields
,”
Journal of Applied Mechanics
 0021-8936, Vol.
58
,
1991
, pp.
104
-
110
.
10.
Shih
,
C. F.
,
O'Dowd
,
N. P.
, and
Kirk
,
M. T.
, “
A Framework for Quantifying Crack Tip Constraint
,”
Constraint Effects in Fracture
, ASTM STP 1171,
E. M.
Hackett
,
K.-H.
Schwalbe
, and
R. H.
Dodds
, Jr.
, Eds.,
1993
, pp.
2
-
20
.
11.
Tregoning
,
R. L.
and
Joyce
,
J. A.
, “
To Evaluation in Common Specimen Geometries
,”
Proceedings of the PVP Conference
,
ASME
, PVP-412,
Seattle Washington
,
2000
, pp.
143
-
152
.
12.
Joyce
,
J. A.
and
Tregoning
,
R. L.
, “
Quantification of Specimen Geometry Effects on the Master Curve and To Reference Temperature
,”
ECF13
,
San Sebastian
,
Spain
,
2000
.
13.
Tregoning
,
R. L.
and
Joyce
,
J. A.
, “
Application of a T-Stress Based Constraint Correction to A533B Steel Fracture Toughness Data
,”
Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics: 33rd Vol.
, ASTM STP 1417,
W. G.
Reuter
and
R. S.
Piascik
, Eds.,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2002
.
14.
Rathbun
,
H. J.
, “
On the Size Scaling of Cleavage Toughness in the Transition: A Single Variable Experiment and Model Based Analysis
,” Ph.D. Thesis,
Department of Mechanical and Environmental Engineering, University of California
, Santa Barbara,
2003
.
15.
Petti
,
J.
and
Dodds
,
R. H.
, Jr.
, “
Constraint Differences Between C(T) and SE(B) Specimens: 3-D Analysis
,” Presented at the
ASTM E 08.06 Task Group Meeting
,
Kansas City, MO
,
06
05
2003
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.