In this communication, we hereby present the erratum to the original paper Kairi et al. [1], to fix some typos/misprints/omissions that could misread the readers, and it is important to provide the correct information by authors.
In Eq. (4), “” should be read as “” and the sign of the fourth term of Eq. (9) is “+” not negative. In Eq. (13), as . The undeclared expressions for “” defined as , “” stands for chemotaxis constant, and . In Eqs. (19) and (20), , and should be read as , and , respectively. “” should read as Schmidt number not Lewis number.
The authors regret the following typos in different expressions given in Kairi et al. [1]:
Authors would like to apologize for any convenience the errors might have caused.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Professor Asterios Pantokratoras from the Democritus University of Thrace for drawing these errors to our attention.