The computational fluid dynamics is an important methodology to study the characteristics of flows in nature and in a number of engineering applications. Modeling nonisothermal flows may be useful to predict the main flow behavior allowing the improvement of equipment and industrial processes. In addition, investigations using computational models may provide key information about the fundamental characteristics of flow, developing theoretical groundwork of physical processes. In the last years, the topic of phase change has been intensively studied using computational fluid dynamics due to the computational and numerical advances reported in the literature. Among several issues related to the phase change topic, direct contact condensation (DCC) is widely studied in the literature since it is part of a number of industrial applications. In the present work, DCC was studied using a mathematical and computational model with an Eulerian approach. The homemade code MFSim was used to run all the computational simulations in the cluster of the Fluid Mechanics Laboratory from the Federal University of Uberlandia (UFU). The computational model was validated and showed results with high accuracy and low differences compared to previous works in the literature. A complex case study of DCC with cross-flow was then studied and the computational model provided accurate results compared to experimental data from the literature. The jet centerline was well represented and the interface dynamic was accurately captured during all the simulation time. The investigation of the velocity field provided information about the deeply transient characteristic of this flow. The v-velocity component presented the more large variations in time since the standard deviation was subjected to a variation of about 45% compared to the temporal average. In addition, the time history of the maximum resultant velocities observed presented magnitude from 29 m/s to 73 m/s. The importance of modeling three-dimensional (3D) effects was confirmed with the relevance of the velocity magnitudes in the third axis component. Therefore, the Eulerian phase change model used in the present study indicated the possibility to model even complex phenomena using an Eulerian approach.

References

1.
Tryggvason
,
G.
,
Scardovelli
,
R.
, and
Zaleski
,
S.
,
2011
,
Direct Numerical Simulations of Gas-Liquid Multiphase Flows
, Vol.
1
,
Cambridge University Press
, New York, p.
337
.
2.
Zohou
,
L.
,
Wang
,
L.
,
Chong
,
D.
,
Yan
,
J.
, and
Liu
,
J.
,
2017
, “
CFD Analysis to Study the Effect of Non-Condensable Gas on Stable Condensation Jet
,”
Prog. Nuclear Energy
,
98
, pp.
143
152
.
3.
Clerx
,
N.
,
van Deurzen
,
L. G. M.
,
Pecenko
,
A.
,
Liew
,
R.
,
van der Geld
,
C. W. M.
, and
Kuerten
,
J. G. M.
,
2011
, “
Temperature Fields Induced by Direct Contact Condensation of Steam in a Cross-Flow in a Channel
,”
Heat Mass Transfer
,
47
(
8
), pp.
981
990
.
4.
Patel
,
G.
,
Tanskanen
,
V.
, and
Kyrki-Rajamäki
,
R.
,
2014
, “
Numerical Modelling of Low-Reynolds Number Direct Contact Condensation in a Suppression Pool Test Facility
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
71
, pp.
376
387
.
5.
Zare
,
S.
,
Jamalkhoo
,
M. H.
, and
Passandideh-Fard
,
M.
,
2018
, “
Experimental Study of Direct Contact Condensation of Steam Jet in Water Flow in a Vertical Pipe With Square Cross Section
,”
Int. J. Multiphase Flow
,
1
, pp.
74
88
.
6.
Clerx
,
N.
,
van der Geld
,
C.
, and
Kuerten
,
J. G.
,
2013
, “
Turbulent Stresses in a Direct Contact Condensation Jet in Cross-Flow in a Duct With Implications for Particle Break-Up
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
,
66
, pp.
684
694
.
7.
Xu
,
Q.
,
Guo
,
L.
,
Chang
,
L.
, and
Wang
,
Y.
,
2016
, “
Velocity Field Characteristics of the Turbulent Jet Induced by Direct Contact Condensation of Steam Jet in Crossflow of Water in a Vertical Pipe
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
,
103
, pp.
305
318
.
8.
van Wissen
,
R. J. E.
,
Schreel
,
K.
, and
van der Geld
,
C. W. M.
,
2005
, “
Particle Image Velocimetry Measurements of a Steam-Driven Confined Turbulent Water Jet
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
530
, pp.
353
368
.
9.
Tanskanen
,
V.
,
Jordan
,
A.
,
Puustinen
,
M.
, and
Kyrki-Rajamäki
,
R.
,
2014
, “
CFD Simulation and Pattern Recognition Analysis of the Chugging Condensation Regime
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
66
, pp.
133
143
.
10.
Tanguy
,
S.
,
Sagan
,
M.
,
Lalanne
,
B.
,
Couderc
,
F.
, and
Colin
,
C.
,
2014
, “
Benchmarks and Numerical Methods for the Simulation of Boiling Flows
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
,
264
, pp.
1
22
.
11.
Kitano
,
T.
,
Nishio
,
J.
,
Kurose
,
R.
, and
Komori
,
S.
,
2014
, “
Effects of Ambient Pressure, Gas Temperature and Combustion Reaction on Droplet Evaporation
,”
Combust. Flame
,
161
(
2
), pp.
551
564
.
12.
Deen
,
N.
, and
Kuipers
,
J.
,
2013
, “
Direct Numerical Simulation of Wall-to Liquid Heat Transfer in Dispersed Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow Using a Volume of Fluid Approach
,”
Chem. Eng. Sci.
,
102
, pp.
268
282
.
13.
Juric
,
D.
, and
Tryggvason
,
G.
,
1998
, “
Computations of Boiling Flows
,”
Int. J. Multiphase Flow
,
24
(
3
), pp.
387
410
.
14.
Lee
,
M. S.
,
Riaz
,
A.
, and
Aute
,
V.
,
2017
, “
Direct Numerical Simulation of Incompressible Multiphase Flow With Phase Change
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
,
344
, pp.
381
418
.
15.
Brackbill
,
J. U.
,
Kothe
,
D. B.
, and
Zemach
,
C.
,
1992
, “
A Continuum Method for Modeling Surface-Tension
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
,
100
(
2
), pp.
335
354
.
16.
Nikolayev
,
V.
,
Chatain
,
D.
,
Garrabos
,
Y.
, and
Beysens
,
D.
,
2016
, “
Experimental Evidence of the Vapor Recoil Mechanism in the Boiling Crisis
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
,
97
, pp.
253
260
.
17.
Welch
,
S. W. J.
, and
Wilson
,
J.
,
2000
, “
A Volume of Fluid Based Method for Fluid Flows With Phase Change
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
,
160
(
2
), pp.
662
682
.
18.
Kim
,
D. G.
,
Jeon
,
C. H.
, and
Park
,
I. S.
,
2017
, “
Comparison of Numerical Phase-Change Models Through Stefan Vaporizing Problem
,”
Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer
,
87
, pp.
228
236
.
19.
Pan
,
Z.
,
Weibel
,
J.
, and
Garimella
,
S. V.
,
2016
, “
A Saturated-Interface-Volume Phase Change Model for Simulating Flow Boiling
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
,
93
, pp.
945
956
.
20.
Hirt
,
C. W.
, and
Nichols
,
B. D.
,
1981
, “
Volume of Fluid (VOF) Method for the Dynamics of Free Boundaries
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
,
39
(
1
), pp.
201
225
.
21.
Wachem
,
B. G. M.
, and
Schouten
,
J. C.
,
2002
, “
Experimental Validation of 3-D Lagrangian VOF Model: Bubble Shape and Rise Velocity
,”
AIChE J.
,
48
, pp.
253
282
.
22.
Samkhaniani
,
N.
, and
Ansari
,
M. R.
,
2016
, “
Numerical Simulation of Bubble Condensation Using CF-VOF
,”
Prog. Nucl. Energy
,
89
, pp.
120
131
.
23.
Chorin
,
A. J.
,
1968
, “
Numerical Solution of the Navier–Stokes Equations
,”
Math. Comput.
,
22
(
104
), pp.
745
762
.
24.
Duarte
,
B. A. F.
,
Melo
,
R. R. S.
,
Villar
,
M. M.
,
Serfaty
,
R.
, and
Silveira-Neto
,
A.
,
2018
, “
An Extension of Oberbeck-Boussinesq Approximation for Thermal Convection Problems
,”
J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng.
,
40
, pp.
38
49
.
25.
Centrella
,
J. M.
, and
Wilson
,
J. R.
,
1984
, “
Planar Numerical Cosmology—Part II: The Difference Eq00uations and Numerical Tests
,”
Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.
,
54
, pp.
229
249
.
26.
Kamei
,
S.
, and
Hirata
,
M.
,
1990
, “
Condensing Phenomena of a Single Vapor Bubble Into Subcooled Water
,”
Exp. Heat Transfer
,
3
(
2
), pp.
173
182
.
You do not currently have access to this content.